本文選題：煙草行政執(zhí)法 + 裁量權(quán)�。� 參考：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：煙草行政裁量權(quán)是煙草行政管理部門在煙草行政執(zhí)法中，根據(jù)法律、法規(guī)的授權(quán)，就煙草專賣以及其他相關(guān)事項(xiàng)而采取的一種自由選擇、自由決定的權(quán)力。與一般的行政執(zhí)法權(quán)相比，煙草行政自由裁量權(quán)具有自主性，煙草行政執(zhí)法部門可以在法律法規(guī)授權(quán)的范圍內(nèi)，對(duì)行政行為的內(nèi)容作出選擇，，煙草行政自由裁量權(quán)同時(shí)又具有倫理性，這就決定了煙草行政自由裁量權(quán)存在被濫用的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。煙草行政自由裁量權(quán)的存在具有重要意義，主要體現(xiàn)在：煙草行政自由裁量權(quán)有利于提高煙草行政執(zhí)法的效率，有利于在個(gè)案中實(shí)現(xiàn)正義，有利于在個(gè)案中實(shí)現(xiàn)正義。煙草行政自由裁量權(quán)在實(shí)踐中有多種表現(xiàn)，包括對(duì)行為性質(zhì)、違法情節(jié)認(rèn)定、處罰種類或處罰幅度以及處罰程序適用方面的自由裁量權(quán)。在執(zhí)法實(shí)踐中，煙草行政自由裁量權(quán)行使主要存在以下問(wèn)題：自由裁量權(quán)行使不當(dāng)導(dǎo)致執(zhí)法主體錯(cuò)位；行政處罰顯失公正；處罰方式上的濫用；煙草行政執(zhí)法程序方面的裁量權(quán)濫用。導(dǎo)致上述問(wèn)題的原因有：執(zhí)法依據(jù)和裁量基準(zhǔn)規(guī)則存在漏洞；煙草執(zhí)法人員素質(zhì)有待提高；執(zhí)法過(guò)程中缺失程序正義理念；沒(méi)有建立行之有效的執(zhí)法績(jī)效考核機(jī)制；沒(méi)有建立良好的權(quán)力運(yùn)行監(jiān)督機(jī)制。針對(duì)當(dāng)前煙草行政自由裁量權(quán)在行使過(guò)程中存在的問(wèn)題，應(yīng)當(dāng)從以下幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行完善：首先，健全煙草行政自由裁量權(quán)立法；其次，在煙草行政執(zhí)法工作中堅(jiān)持正當(dāng)程序原則；完善煙草行政自由裁量權(quán)執(zhí)法機(jī)制；完善煙草行政自由裁量權(quán)行使的監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:Tobacco administrative discretion is a kind of free choice and decision power adopted by tobacco administrative department in tobacco administrative law enforcement according to the authorization of laws and regulations on tobacco monopoly and other related matters.Compared with general administrative law enforcement power, tobacco administrative discretion has its own autonomy. Tobacco administrative law enforcement departments can choose the content of administrative acts within the scope of laws and regulations.Tobacco administrative discretion is ethical at the same time, which determines the risk of abuse of tobacco administrative discretion.The existence of tobacco administrative discretion is of great significance, mainly reflected in: tobacco administrative discretion is beneficial to improve the efficiency of tobacco administrative law enforcement, to achieve justice in individual cases, and to achieve justice in individual cases.The administrative discretion of tobacco has a variety of manifestations in practice, including the nature of the behavior, the determination of the circumstances of the violation, the type or extent of punishment and the discretion in the application of the punishment procedure.In the practice of enforcing the law, the following problems exist in the exercise of the administrative discretion of tobacco: improper exercise of the discretion leads to the dislocation of the subject of law enforcement, the obvious injustice of the administrative punishment, the abuse of the way of punishment;Abuse of discretion in tobacco administrative law enforcement procedures.The reasons for the above problems are as follows: there are loopholes in the basis of law enforcement and the benchmark rules of discretion; the quality of tobacco law enforcement personnel needs to be improved; the concept of procedural justice is lacking in the process of law enforcement; there is no effective mechanism for evaluating the performance of law enforcement;No good supervision mechanism of power operation has been established.In view of the problems existing in the process of the exercise of tobacco administrative discretion, we should perfect it from the following aspects: first, perfect tobacco administrative discretion legislation; second,We should adhere to the principle of due process in tobacco administrative law enforcement; perfect the enforcement mechanism of tobacco administrative discretion; perfect the supervision and restriction mechanism of tobacco administrative discretion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 周旺生;;論法律的秩序價(jià)值[J];法學(xué)家;2003年05期

2 陳立香;論依法行政和行政自由裁量權(quán)的關(guān)系[J];中國(guó)工商管理研究;2002年12期

本文編號(hào)：1742145