本文選題：行政規(guī)范性文件　切入點(diǎn)：備案　出處：《江西師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：行政規(guī)范性文件作為我國(guó)法律、法規(guī)、規(guī)章等的重要補(bǔ)充，不僅是我國(guó)國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)合法合理行政的依據(jù)，也是廣大公民維護(hù)自身合法權(quán)益的重要保障，在我國(guó)的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)生活和社會(huì)生活中發(fā)揮著舉足輕重的作用。但是因?yàn)橹贫ㄖ黧w的多樣化以及素質(zhì)水平參差不齊等原因，導(dǎo)致制定的行政規(guī)范性文件也是五花八門(mén)。國(guó)家層面上又缺乏統(tǒng)一的規(guī)定，這導(dǎo)致行政規(guī)范性文件出現(xiàn)了一系列問(wèn)題，如下級(jí)行政規(guī)范性文件違反上級(jí)法規(guī)規(guī)章，同級(jí)行政規(guī)范性文件內(nèi)容相沖突等等，導(dǎo)致國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)及公民在適用行政規(guī)范性文件時(shí)無(wú)所適從。 本文以行政規(guī)范性文件的備案審查為視角，采用實(shí)證分析的方法，對(duì)行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查的理論問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了梳理，對(duì)其在社會(huì)生活中的現(xiàn)狀、存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了全面分析，對(duì)完善行政規(guī)范性文件的備案審查提出了思考。本文分為引言、正文、結(jié)語(yǔ)和后記四個(gè)部分，其中正文包括四章： 第一部分，行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度概述。首先，分別明確了行政規(guī)范性文件和行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查的概念，，并分析了備案與審查的關(guān)系。其次，分析說(shuō)明了行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度的意義。最后，從理論方面闡釋了行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查的依據(jù)。 第二部分，對(duì)行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度于其他法律制度的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了分析。首先，對(duì)行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度與違憲審查制度、清理制度做了比較分析，分析他們之間的聯(lián)系與區(qū)別。其次，對(duì)備案審查制度與行政復(fù)議制度和行政訴訟制度的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了探討。 第三部分，行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度的現(xiàn)狀分析。首先從內(nèi)容不明確、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一等方面對(duì)行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了闡述，然后分別從思想認(rèn)識(shí)、制度缺陷和機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置等方面對(duì)其進(jìn)行了原因分析。 第四部分，完善行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度的思考。分別從完善實(shí)體上與程序上的規(guī)定進(jìn)行了思考，還從建立相關(guān)配套制度方面提出了完善行政規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度的措施。
[Abstract]:As an important supplement to the laws, regulations and rules of our country, administrative normative documents are not only the basis for the legitimate and reasonable administration of our state organs, but also an important guarantee for the broad masses of citizens to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests.In our country's political and economic life and social life plays a pivotal role.However, due to the diversity of the subject and the level of quality, the administrative normative documents are also varied.There is also a lack of uniform regulations at the national level, which leads to a series of problems in administrative normative documents, such as the following administrative normative documents violate the rules and regulations of higher levels, the contents of administrative normative documents at the same level conflict with each other, etc.As a result, state organs and citizens are at a loss when applying administrative normative documents.From the perspective of filing and examination of administrative normative documents, this paper, by means of empirical analysis, combs the theoretical problems of administrative normative documents' archival review, and makes a comprehensive analysis of its present situation and existing problems in social life.The paper puts forward some thoughts on how to improve the filing and examination of administrative normative documents.This paper is divided into four parts: introduction, text, conclusion and postscript, in which the text consists of four chapters:The first part is an overview of the system of filing and examining administrative normative documents.Firstly, the concepts of administrative normative documents and administrative normative documents are defined, and the relationship between filing and examination is analyzed.Secondly, it explains the significance of administrative normative documents filing and examination system.Finally, it explains the basis of administrative normative document record examination from the theory aspect.The second part analyzes the relationship between administrative normative documents filing and examination system and other legal systems.First of all, the paper makes a comparative analysis of the administrative normative document record examination system and the unconstitutional review system, and analyzes the relationship and difference between them.Secondly, the relationship between the record-keeping review system, the administrative review system and the administrative litigation system is discussed.The third part is the analysis of the current situation of administrative normative documents filing and examination system.At first, the paper expounds the problems of administrative normative documents filing and examining from the aspects of unclear content and inconsistent standards, and then analyzes the reasons from the aspects of ideological understanding, institutional defects and institutional setting.The fourth part, consummates the administrative normative document to put on record the examination system ponder.From the aspects of perfecting the substantive and procedural provisions, this paper also puts forward some measures to perfect the administrative normative documents filing and examination system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 鄭秋陽(yáng);;論行政規(guī)范性文件的政府備案審查[J];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

2 孔繁華;;行政規(guī)范性文件法律監(jiān)督機(jī)制探究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年07期

3 馬嶺;孫志剛案的啟示:違憲審查還是違法審查[J];國(guó)家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

4 王臘生;;規(guī)范性文件備案審查制度及其完善建議——從國(guó)家權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)監(jiān)督的角度[J];南京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

5 陳麗芳;;論權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)非立法性行政規(guī)范性文件的監(jiān)督[J];人大研究;2007年03期

6 李鴻建;楊樂(lè)修;;國(guó)外違憲審查制度比較及其啟示[J];人大研究;2007年05期

7 王錫明;;淺談地方人大常委會(huì)如何做好規(guī)范性文件備案審查工作[J];時(shí)代主人;2012年10期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郭清梅;行政規(guī)定規(guī)制研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：1692878