本文選題：社會(huì)募捐　切入點(diǎn)：善款余額　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來，社會(huì)救助、保障事業(yè)也獲得了長足的發(fā)展，國家也出臺(tái)相應(yīng)的法律對其進(jìn)行規(guī)范，但從整體上來看，我國的社會(huì)保障體系仍不完善，與發(fā)達(dá)國家存在著很大差距，在此情況下，社會(huì)慈善事業(yè)的及時(shí)出現(xiàn)對國家救助保障事業(yè)的完善起到了極大的促進(jìn)作用，同時(shí)處于起步階段的社會(huì)募捐，也發(fā)揮著越來越重要的作用。 但目前我國無專門的法律對之進(jìn)行規(guī)范調(diào)整，相關(guān)法律規(guī)定也繁雜零散，一個(gè)原本動(dòng)機(jī)良好的行為卻在司法實(shí)踐中造成諸多糾紛，嚴(yán)重?fù)p害了人們的捐贈(zèng)熱情，如果不對其加以規(guī)范任其發(fā)展將產(chǎn)生不良的社會(huì)影響，所以對社會(huì)募捐的研究是極其必要的。社會(huì)募捐剩余財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)歸屬引發(fā)的糾紛整個(gè)社會(huì)募捐糾紛中，占有較大的比重，所以社會(huì)募捐剩余財(cái)產(chǎn)的所有權(quán)歸屬也是本文的重點(diǎn)研究內(nèi)容。 本文由引言、正文和結(jié)語三個(gè)方面組成。 正文的第一部分是社會(huì)募捐及社會(huì)募捐剩余財(cái)產(chǎn)的基礎(chǔ)理論，，分為三個(gè)具體層次。一是由案例引入，了解在實(shí)踐處理中社會(huì)募捐剩余財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)歸屬的爭議點(diǎn)，介紹社會(huì)募捐的含義以及社會(huì)募捐和近似概念的比較區(qū)別，明晰社會(huì)募捐的涵義，二是論述社會(huì)募捐的含義以及社會(huì)募捐和近似概念的比較區(qū)別，三是明確社會(huì)募捐剩余財(cái)產(chǎn)的產(chǎn)生根源及其特殊性的表現(xiàn)，為下文的論述做好鋪墊。 正文的第二部分是整篇文章的中心內(nèi)容。介紹社會(huì)募捐剩余財(cái)產(chǎn)所有權(quán)歸屬的具體確認(rèn)。分別從社會(huì)募捐的行為性質(zhì)，法理學(xué)角度和社會(huì)公共政策，物的所有權(quán)取得方式以及社會(huì)募捐的分類幾個(gè)方面綜合，本著既能保護(hù)捐贈(zèng)人社會(huì)募捐的積極性，保護(hù)受贈(zèng)人的合法權(quán)益，又符合社會(huì)募捐本身的價(jià)值取向的原則，最后得出結(jié)論，認(rèn)為社會(huì)募捐的所有權(quán)歸屬分兩種情況討論，在政府型募捐的情況下，歸屬于政府所有，在其他的情況下，歸屬于社會(huì)公益機(jī)構(gòu)所有。 本文的第三部分綜合案件的實(shí)踐處理以及理論上的探討，明晰我國在社會(huì)募捐活動(dòng)中存在的不足，這些不足的完善正是解決社會(huì)募捐剩余財(cái)產(chǎn)歸屬的重點(diǎn)，故最后提出改善這些不足的措施和建議。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, the cause of social assistance and security has also been greatly developed, and the country has also issued corresponding laws to regulate it. But on the whole, the social security system of our country is still not perfect. There is a big gap with the developed countries. In this case, the timely appearance of social charity has played a great role in promoting the improvement of the national rescue and security undertakings, and at the same time, the social fundraising in the initial stage has been greatly promoted. Also play a more and more important role. But at present, there is no special law to regulate it in our country, and the relevant laws and regulations are also complicated and scattered. A well-motivated behavior has caused many disputes in judicial practice, which has seriously damaged people's donation enthusiasm. If it is not standardized, its development will have a negative social impact, so it is extremely necessary to study social fund-raising. So the ownership of the surplus property is also the focus of this paper. This paper consists of three aspects: introduction, text and conclusion. The first part of the text is the basic theory of social fundraising and the surplus property of social collection, which is divided into three specific levels. This paper introduces the meaning of social fundraising and the comparative difference between social fund-raising and approximate concepts, clarifies the meaning of social fundraising, and discusses the meaning of social fund-raising and the comparative difference between social fund-raising and similar concepts. The third is to make clear the origin and particularity of the surplus property of social collection, and to lay the groundwork for the following discussion. The second part of the text is the central content of the whole article. It introduces the specific confirmation of the ownership of the surplus property in social fund-raising. The way of obtaining ownership of things and the classification of social donations are integrated, in line with the principle of protecting the enthusiasm of the donors, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the recipients, and conforming to the value orientation of the social fundraising itself. Finally, it is concluded that the ownership of social fund-raising is divided into two situations, in the case of government donations, belong to the government, in other cases, belong to the public institutions. The third part of this paper deals with the practice of comprehensive cases and makes clear the deficiencies in the social fund-raising activities in China. The perfection of these deficiencies is the key to solve the problem of the ownership of the surplus property in the social fund-raising. Finally, the measures and suggestions to improve these deficiencies are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.182.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 印欣昕;;社會(huì)募捐引發(fā)的法律思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年03期

2 王曉飛;;社會(huì)募捐法律性質(zhì)淺析[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年01期

3 俞婷婷;劉力;;慈善捐贈(zèng)余額的困境與重構(gòu)[J];法制與社會(huì);2013年15期

4 李麗霞;;社會(huì)募捐款的使用及規(guī)范[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年09期

5 葉朋;;救災(zāi)捐贈(zèng)財(cái)產(chǎn)的法律監(jiān)管研究[J];江蘇科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

6 王炳軍;;社會(huì)募捐行為法律分析——兼談江蘇省善款糾紛第一案[J];寧波工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

7 郭麗韞;單潤澤;;社會(huì)募捐的法律性質(zhì)及糾紛的解決[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期

8 薛文成;關(guān)于贈(zèng)與合同的幾個(gè)問題[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年04期

9 孫琦琳;;如何改善我國的慈善私益募捐制度[J];青年文學(xué)家;2010年15期

10 柴振國;潘靜;;關(guān)于社會(huì)募捐的法律思考[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

本文編號(hào)：1658055