本文選題：社會保險權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：社會保險爭議　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國現(xiàn)有的社會保險爭議處理路徑十分混亂。完善和改革我國社會保險爭議處理路徑的基礎(chǔ)在于須對社會保險爭議的屬性進(jìn)行重新認(rèn)識及定位。本文在對過往的文獻(xiàn)資料、現(xiàn)有的立法現(xiàn)狀和改革成果進(jìn)行梳理、總結(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合現(xiàn)實中容易引起混淆的問題點(diǎn),加以具體闡述和論證。第一部分,試圖厘清我國社會保險爭議的概念,把社會保險爭議界定為勞動者與用人單位、勞動者與社會保險經(jīng)辦機(jī)構(gòu)之間發(fā)生的社會保險爭議以及因第三人侵權(quán)導(dǎo)致侵權(quán)損害賠償和社會保險給付并行給付的爭議。再對社會保險權(quán)的權(quán)利屬性進(jìn)行辨析。社會保險權(quán)核心在于社會保險待遇給付請求權(quán)。筆者又對社會保險法律關(guān)系、社會保險爭議的"社會屬性"、"公法保險屬性"、"法定屬性"進(jìn)行厘清,筆者認(rèn)為社會保險爭議屬于公私兼顧,以公為主,不應(yīng)以私法救濟(jì)代替公法救濟(jì),而應(yīng)該構(gòu)建公法救濟(jì)為主,私法救濟(jì)為輔的"二元救濟(jì)路徑",強(qiáng)調(diào)國家責(zé)任的主導(dǎo)性。第二部分,對我國社會保險爭議處理路徑的構(gòu)建的原因進(jìn)行分析,并介紹當(dāng)前我國我國社會保險爭議處理路徑的立法現(xiàn)狀和存在的問題,例如勞動者社會保險權(quán)益規(guī)范不力、社會保險爭議處理機(jī)構(gòu)主管范圍不明晰、行政執(zhí)法與仲裁、訴訟救濟(jì)的分割化、未建立專門的社會保險爭議處理機(jī)構(gòu)與程序等。第三部分,通過介紹和借鑒域外社會保險爭議處理路徑的立法例,指明我國應(yīng)實行公法救濟(jì)前置主義,正確處理行政權(quán)與司法權(quán)的關(guān)系以及設(shè)置專門的社會保險爭議處理機(jī)構(gòu)和程序,設(shè)立違憲審查制度等。第四部分,提出完善和改革我國社會保險爭議處理路徑的方案構(gòu)想,我國社會保險爭議處理路徑當(dāng)下的完善方案為:明確對勞動者社會保險權(quán)益的規(guī)定、社會保險相關(guān)行政部門建立協(xié)作機(jī)制、界定社會保險爭議處理機(jī)構(gòu)的主管范圍、社會保險爭議處理程序的銜接和完善;長遠(yuǎn)的改革方案為:確立我國社會保險權(quán)利救濟(jì)程序立法的全新理念、制定處理社會保險爭議配套的程序法律、設(shè)立處理社會保險爭議的專門處理機(jī)構(gòu)、設(shè)立憲法法院。
[Abstract]:The existing path of social insurance dispute settlement in China is very chaotic. The foundation of perfecting and reforming the path of social insurance dispute settlement in China lies in the need to re-understand and position the attributes of social insurance dispute. On the basis of summing up the existing legislative status and reform achievements, and combining with the confusing problems in reality, it is expounded and demonstrated concretely. The first part tries to clarify the concept of social insurance dispute in China. Defining social insurance disputes as workers and employers, The social insurance dispute between the laborer and the social insurance agency and the dispute between the tort damage compensation and the social insurance payment caused by the third party tort. The analysis of the right attribute of the social insurance right. The core of the right to social insurance lies in the right to claim payment of social insurance benefits. The "social attribute", "public law insurance attribute" and "legal attribute" of the social insurance dispute are clarified. The author thinks that the social insurance dispute belongs to the public and the public, and should not replace the public law relief with the private law remedy. In the second part, the author analyzes the reasons for the construction of the path of social insurance dispute settlement in China, which should be based on public law relief and supplemented by private law relief, emphasizing the leading role of national responsibility. It also introduces the current legislative situation and existing problems of China's social insurance dispute settlement path, such as the weak regulation of workers' social insurance rights and interests, the unclear scope of competence of social insurance dispute processing institutions, administrative law enforcement and arbitration, etc. The third part, through introducing and drawing lessons from the legislation examples of the settlement path of the social insurance dispute, points out that our country should carry out the preposition of public law relief. Dealing with the relationship between administrative power and judicial power correctly, setting up special social insurance dispute handling institutions and procedures, setting up unconstitutional review system, etc., etc., puts forward a plan to perfect and reform the path of social insurance dispute settlement in our country. The current perfect scheme of the path of social insurance dispute settlement in China is as follows: defining the regulations on the social insurance rights and interests of workers, establishing a cooperative mechanism of social insurance related administrative departments, and defining the scope of competence of the social insurance dispute settlement organization. The long-term reform plan is: to establish a new concept of legislation of social insurance right relief procedure, to formulate procedural laws to deal with social insurance disputes, To set up a special body to deal with social insurance disputes and to establish a Constitutional Court.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.182.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 方宜圣;陳梟窈;;行政復(fù)議體制改革“義烏模式”思考[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2016年05期

2 樂巍;吳仕春;陳璐;;先行支付工傷保險待遇的適用[J];人民司法(案例);2016年14期

3 付鳴劍;王明輝;江朝麗;;工傷認(rèn)定中工作原因的判定[J];人民司法(案例);2016年08期

4 蔣蓓;蔡鵬;;符合工傷認(rèn)定情形的舉證責(zé)任分配[J];人民司法(案例);2016年08期

5 李霄敏;向蕻;;工傷認(rèn)定糾紛的協(xié)調(diào)和化解[J];人民司法;2013年07期

6 李志明;;德國社會保險自治管理機(jī)制:歷史嬗變、改革及其啟示[J];歐洲研究;2012年04期

7 林嘉;;社會保險的權(quán)利救濟(jì)[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2012年07期

8 周長征;;社會轉(zhuǎn)型視野下農(nóng)民工養(yǎng)老保險權(quán)利的法律救濟(jì):以去私法化為中心[J];法學(xué)評論;2012年02期

9 周江洪;;侵權(quán)賠償與社會保險并行給付的困境與出路[J];中國社會科學(xué);2011年04期

10 徐以祥;;行政法上請求權(quán)的理論構(gòu)造[J];法學(xué)研究;2010年06期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條

1 伍星 ;劉星 ;張琴 ;劉勛 ;石珍;;積極規(guī)范勞資關(guān)系 依法維護(hù)勞動權(quán)益[N];人民法院報;2015年

2 許閑;戎云林;;德國社會保險的司法權(quán)[N];中國保險報;2009年

3 甘正氣;;日本最高法院在憲法轉(zhuǎn)變中的作用[N];人民法院報;2005年

，

本文編號：1616851