發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-11 14:30

  本文選題：健康保護(hù)　切入點(diǎn)：風(fēng)險(xiǎn)規(guī)制　出處：《行政法學(xué)研究》2015年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：風(fēng)險(xiǎn)規(guī)制法的目標(biāo)和方法在于具體危險(xiǎn)的防御和預(yù)防(可能的)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。對于科技工藝和技術(shù)生產(chǎn)的物質(zhì)或生物來說,除了懲罰禁止措施外,需要建構(gòu)一套傳統(tǒng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)防的前置制度,通過廣泛的公眾參與來對科技后果進(jìn)行評估,從而采取相應(yīng)的預(yù)防措施。風(fēng)險(xiǎn)規(guī)制的行政法方法包括傳統(tǒng)的行政調(diào)控方式和信息規(guī)制方法、激勵型規(guī)制手段等非禁令手段的方法。通過智慧的規(guī)制方法既可實(shí)現(xiàn)意欲達(dá)到的規(guī)制目標(biāo),同時(shí)也能降低行政管理成本和減少對經(jīng)濟(jì)活動的過度干預(yù)。
[Abstract]:The objective and method of the risk regulation law is to guard against and prevent (possible) risks from specific hazards. For substances or organisms produced by science, technology and technology, in addition to punitive prohibitions, There is a need to build a set of traditional pre-emptive systems for risk prevention that assess the consequences of science and technology through broad public participation. Therefore, the corresponding preventive measures should be taken. The administrative law methods of risk regulation include the traditional administrative regulation and control methods and the information regulation methods. By means of intelligent regulation, we can not only achieve the desired regulatory objectives, but also reduce administrative costs and excessive interference in economic activities.
【作者單位】： 德國法蘭克福歌德大學(xué);中德規(guī)制法研究所;中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D922.16
，

本文編號：1598583