本文選題：警察　切入點：武器使用權(quán)　出處：《福州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：警察武器使用權(quán)是指人民警察為了履行職責(zé),依法對他人使用武器的權(quán)力,是警察權(quán)的一種特殊表現(xiàn)形式,具有執(zhí)法權(quán)的實質(zhì),是警察制止違法犯罪、保護(hù)公民人身財產(chǎn)及公共財產(chǎn)安全的武力手段。相對武器使用權(quán)的重要性,我國現(xiàn)有的武器使用權(quán)制度卻明顯滯后,體現(xiàn)為相關(guān)法律法規(guī)立法位階太低,武器使用主體和客體不明確,使用條件標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不易掌控,審核監(jiān)督機制不完善,等等。因此,借鑒境外先進(jìn)立法和司法經(jīng)驗,完善我國武器使用權(quán)立法,是保證警察合法使用武器的重要基礎(chǔ)。除引言與結(jié)語外,本文共有四個部分：第一部分對警察武器使用權(quán)進(jìn)行概括分析,闡述了警察武器使用權(quán)的相關(guān)概念特征,并分析警察武器使用權(quán)的內(nèi)容包括使用權(quán)主體、使用權(quán)客體、使用內(nèi)容、使用條件、武器使用權(quán)的審核監(jiān)督和相關(guān)保障制度。第二部分針對境外警察武器使用權(quán)制度的發(fā)展情況,研析了美國、英國、中國香港等地的警察武器使用權(quán)制度的發(fā)展情況。美國由于法律規(guī)定居民可以合法持槍,所以警察武器使用權(quán)法律法規(guī)相對發(fā)展的早,也比較成熟；英國采取的是文職警察和授權(quán)武裝警察分立的模式,對武器使用的主體有了比較規(guī)范明確的界定；中國香港在武器管理、使用和事后保障方面有非常明確具體的規(guī)定。第三部分分析了我國警察武器使用權(quán)制度的立法現(xiàn)狀和不足。我國武器使用權(quán)立法主要體現(xiàn)憲法、法律、行政法規(guī)、部門規(guī)章、司法解釋等方面,但存在著立法位階問題、使用主體不夠明確、使用客體不易判明、使用武器的內(nèi)容不明確、使用武器條件標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不易掌控、審核部門與監(jiān)督部門眾多、用后保障空缺等問題。第四部分對我國警察武器使用權(quán)制度的完善提出了建議。依托系統(tǒng)論、信息論、控制論的指導(dǎo)理論,在提升我國警察使用武器專門法律的位階、明確武器使用權(quán)的歸屬、明確使用客體、對使用武器的行為進(jìn)行分層級明確、對使用武器條件標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行細(xì)化、規(guī)范審核部門與監(jiān)督部門、重視用后保障相關(guān)制度等方面完善我國警察武器使用權(quán)制度的立法。
[Abstract]:The right to use a police weapon is the power of the people's police to use weapons against others in accordance with the law in order to perform their duties. It is a special manifestation of the power of the police, which has the essence of the power to enforce the law. Relative to the importance of the right to use weapons, the current system of the right to use weapons in our country is obviously lagging behind, which is reflected in the low level of relevant laws and regulations. The subject and object of weapon use are not clear, the standard of using condition is not easy to control, the mechanism of audit and supervision is not perfect, and so on. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, there are four parts in this paper: the first part gives a general analysis of the right to use the police weapons, and expounds the relevant conceptual characteristics of the right to use the weapons. And analyzes the contents of the right to use of police weapons, including the subject of the right to use, the object of the right to use, the content of use, the conditions of use, The second part focuses on the development of the weapons use right system for overseas police officers, and analyzes the United States, the United Kingdom, the United States, the United Kingdom, the United States, the United Kingdom, the United States and the United Kingdom. The development of the police weapons use right system in Hong Kong and other places in China. Because the law stipulates that the residents can legally carry guns, the laws and regulations of the police weapons use right develop relatively early and mature; Britain has adopted a separate model of civilian police and authorized armed police, which has a relatively standardized and clear definition of the subject of weapon use; Hong Kong, China, is managing weapons. There are very clear and specific provisions in terms of use and ex post protection. The third part analyzes the current legislative situation and deficiencies of the police weapons use right system in China. The legislation on the right to use weapons in our country mainly embodies the Constitution, laws, administrative regulations, departmental regulations, In judicial interpretation and other aspects, however, there are problems of legislative rank, the use of the subject is not clear enough, the use of the object is difficult to identify, the content of the use of weapons is not clear, the standard of the use of weapons is not easy to control, and there are many auditing and supervising departments. Part 4th puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the system of police weapon use right in China. Relying on the guiding theory of system theory, information theory and cybernetics, it is promoting the rank of special law on the use of weapons by police in our country, which is based on the guidance theory of system theory, information theory and cybernetics. Defining the ownership of the right to the use of weapons, defining the objects of use, classifying the use of weapons into different levels, refining the criteria for the conditions of use of weapons, standardizing the auditing and auditing departments and supervising departments, Emphasis should be placed on the legislation of the police weapon use right system in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.14

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 樊守政;;我國警察“武器使用”與“法律適用”問題研究[J];政法學(xué)刊;2012年02期

，

本文編號：1584051