本文選題：行政責(zé)令行為　切入點(diǎn)：行政決定　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：現(xiàn)行法律、行政法規(guī)中不乏有關(guān)責(zé)令改正、責(zé)令賠償、責(zé)令停止違法行為等規(guī)定，這些也是行政執(zhí)法過程中較為重要的手段，但學(xué)界中對(duì)于這些責(zé)令行為進(jìn)行專門理論研究的并不常見，，其法律屬性也是眾說紛紜、各持所見，并沒有形成一個(gè)系統(tǒng)、明確的理論體系，為此有必要在理論上對(duì)該種行為進(jìn)行梳理和研究。本文將這些行為統(tǒng)稱為行政責(zé)令行為，行政機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)行政責(zé)令行為重要性的認(rèn)識(shí)不夠充分，再加上其理論體系的混亂導(dǎo)致執(zhí)法過程中出現(xiàn)了很多問題，例如行政機(jī)關(guān)重處罰而輕責(zé)令、行政責(zé)令行為的執(zhí)行程序薄弱、后續(xù)保障制度不完善等方面。近年來，學(xué)界對(duì)于責(zé)令行為這種行政手段愈發(fā)關(guān)注和重視，行政責(zé)令行為是有著自身獨(dú)立的存在價(jià)值和實(shí)踐意義。本文通過對(duì)現(xiàn)行行政法規(guī)中規(guī)定的各種行政責(zé)令行為進(jìn)行梳理、界定、分類和辨析，進(jìn)一步明確其類屬問題以及在執(zhí)法中的功能作用，以期能夠?qū)π姓▽W(xué)理論發(fā)展和行政管理提供一些有用的參考。 本文研究的主要內(nèi)容有兩個(gè)方面：一方面是對(duì)現(xiàn)行行政法規(guī)中規(guī)定的各種行政責(zé)令行為進(jìn)行梳理和分類；另一方面是進(jìn)一步明確行政責(zé)令行為的法律屬性，從而能夠在立法以及司法實(shí)踐上完善行政責(zé)令行為的體系和程序。 文章主要采用文本分析以及實(shí)證分析的方法進(jìn)行研究，分成四個(gè)部分來論述行政責(zé)令行為。第一部分概述了行政責(zé)令行為的理論現(xiàn)狀，包括學(xué)者們的一些主要學(xué)說和觀點(diǎn)，并討論行政責(zé)令行為的概念及類屬問題，將它與行政命令、行政處罰以及行政強(qiáng)制進(jìn)行比較研究。另外還分析了關(guān)于行政責(zé)令行為立法現(xiàn)狀和研究現(xiàn)狀中存在的問題，包括相關(guān)立法分散、規(guī)范表述各異、行為定性沖突以及執(zhí)行程序薄弱這四個(gè)方面。第二部分是行政責(zé)令行為之法規(guī)文本分析，通過對(duì)行政處罰法頒布后的現(xiàn)行行政法規(guī)進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的梳理和分析，從中對(duì)行政責(zé)令行為的各個(gè)種類和結(jié)構(gòu)形式進(jìn)行分類討論，同時(shí)還對(duì)法規(guī)梳理過程中發(fā)現(xiàn)的具體問題進(jìn)行研究論證。第三部分是行政責(zé)令行為之性質(zhì)辨析，根據(jù)法律文本的梳理情況，本部分主要討論分析使用頻次較多、爭議較多的幾種行政責(zé)令行為，從他們的結(jié)構(gòu)形式入手，探討其法律屬性和其他責(zé)令行為的區(qū)別，主要包括責(zé)令改正、責(zé)令停業(yè)整頓、責(zé)令停止違法行為、責(zé)令賠償和責(zé)令恢復(fù)原狀這五種責(zé)令行為。最后一個(gè)部分是關(guān)于行政責(zé)令行為的法律規(guī)制，進(jìn)一步規(guī)范行政責(zé)令行為的名稱表述、明確其在行政執(zhí)法中的功能意義，提出關(guān)于行政責(zé)令行為的立法模式構(gòu)建的相關(guān)建議以及程序保障的一些思考，從而更好的指導(dǎo)行政執(zhí)法、保護(hù)相對(duì)人的合法權(quán)益。
[Abstract]:In the current laws and administrative regulations, there are many provisions concerning orders to correct, orders to compensate, and orders to stop illegal acts. These are also more important means in the process of administrative law enforcement. However, it is not common in academic circles to conduct special theoretical research on these ordered acts, and their legal attributes are also diverse. They hold different opinions and do not form a systematic, clear theoretical system. Therefore, it is necessary to sort out and study this kind of behavior in theory. In addition, the confusion in its theoretical system has led to many problems in the process of enforcing the law. For example, the administrative authorities have imposed heavy penalties rather than orders, the enforcement procedures of administrative orders have been weak, the follow-up safeguard system has not been perfect and so on in recent years. The academic circles pay more and more attention to the behavior of order, which has its own existence value and practical significance. In order to provide some useful reference for the development of the theory of administrative law and the administrative management, the classification and analysis of the classification and the function of the classification and the function in the enforcement of the law can be further clarified. The main contents of this paper are as follows: on the one hand, it combs and classifies all kinds of administrative order acts stipulated in the current administrative regulations; on the other hand, it further clarifies the legal attributes of administrative order acts. In order to perfect the system and procedure of administrative order in legislation and judicial practice. This article mainly uses the text analysis and the empirical analysis method to carry on the research, divides into four parts to discuss the administrative order behavior, the first part has outlined the administrative order behavior theory present situation, including some scholars' main theories and the viewpoint, It also discusses the concept and category of administrative order behavior, compares it with administrative order, administrative punishment and administrative compulsion. The second part is the analysis of the legal texts of administrative orders, including the four aspects of the decentralization of relevant legislation, the different expression of norms, the conflict of behavior characterization and the weakness of enforcement procedures. By combing and analyzing the current administrative laws and regulations after the promulgation of the Administrative punishment Law, the various types and structural forms of administrative orders are classified and discussed. The third part is the nature of the administrative order behavior discrimination, according to the combing of the legal text, this part mainly discusses the use of more frequency, Starting from their structural forms, several kinds of administrative orders that are controversial are discussed in terms of their legal attributes and the differences between them and other ordered acts, mainly including orders to correct, order suspension of business and rectification, and order to stop illegal acts. The last part deals with the legal regulation of the administrative order, further standardizing the description of the name of the administrative order, and clarifying its functional significance in administrative law enforcement. This paper puts forward some suggestions on the construction of the legislative model of administrative order behavior and some thoughts on the procedural guarantee so as to better guide the administrative law enforcement and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the counterpart.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 朱錦杰;;海洋行政執(zhí)法中“責(zé)令停止違法行為”的法律屬性及其適用[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2012年06期

本文編號(hào)：1575482