本文選題：公物　切入點(diǎn)：公物利用　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：公物利用是公物的核心價值所在,隨著給付行政時代的到來,公物利用已深入到人們生活的方方面面。為了適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會的快速發(fā)展,國家肩負(fù)著提供越來越多公物的職責(zé),公民對公物的需求和依賴也越來越明顯。在公物利用的過程中,近年來不斷涌現(xiàn)出各種各樣侵害公物利用者權(quán)益的案例,而依照我國現(xiàn)有的法律體系,卻不能對此提供充分的救濟(jì)。依照目前我國現(xiàn)有的法律制度,對公民在公物利用中所遭受的權(quán)利損害,只能從憲法、民法、物權(quán)法和其他部門法中尋找到權(quán)利救濟(jì)的依據(jù)。鑒于目前我國對公物利用過程中的權(quán)利救濟(jì)不全面、不完善,因此為保證公民在公物利用過程中的權(quán)利不受侵害,為了使此項(xiàng)權(quán)利遭到侵害時得到救濟(jì),僅僅依靠現(xiàn)有的法律制度是遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不夠的,迫切需要建立系統(tǒng)完善的公物利用權(quán)利救濟(jì)體系。本文試從公物的概念及其類型的剖析入手,對公物及公物利用進(jìn)行一個宏觀的把握。在此基礎(chǔ)上分析公物利用中的侵權(quán)形態(tài)與問題,歸納總結(jié)出幾種常見的不同類型的侵權(quán)形態(tài),并通過具體案例剖析侵權(quán)形態(tài)背后隱藏的法律與制度問題,以及權(quán)利救濟(jì)的困境。在此基礎(chǔ)上最終尋求公物利用之權(quán)利侵害的行政訴訟法救濟(jì),并從受案范圍、原告資格、訴訟類型的選擇和國家賠償?shù)慕嵌葹楣锢弥姓V訟法救濟(jì)開辟一條道路。本文大量運(yùn)用案例分析法,通過具體案例的分析對文中的觀點(diǎn)提供有力的支撐;運(yùn)用比較分析方法,對公物制度進(jìn)行比較法研究,對中外學(xué)者就同一個問題的不同觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析和評價,并借鑒德國、日本、我國臺灣地區(qū)的公物理論和相關(guān)制度,結(jié)合我國目前的司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),對公物利用中的權(quán)利救濟(jì)提出可行性的建議。
[Abstract]:The use of public property is the core value of public property. With the arrival of the era of administration of payment, the use of public property has penetrated into all aspects of people's life. In order to adapt to the rapid development of economic and social development, the country is shouldering the responsibility of providing more and more public property. Citizens' demand for and dependence on public property is also becoming more and more obvious. In the process of public property utilization, there have been various cases of encroachment on the rights and interests of public property users in recent years, and according to the existing legal system of our country, According to the current legal system of our country, the damage to the rights suffered by citizens in the use of public property can only be attributed to the constitution, the civil law, In order to ensure that the rights of citizens in the process of using public property are not infringed, in order to ensure that the rights of citizens in the process of public property use are not comprehensive and perfect in our country, we find the basis of right relief in the law of real rights and other departments. In order to get relief when this right is infringed, it is far from enough to rely on the existing legal system. It is urgent to establish a systematic and perfect relief system for the right to use public property. This paper tries to start with the concept and types of public property. On the basis of the analysis of the forms and problems of tort in the use of public property, the author summarizes several common forms of infringement of public property and their utilization. On the basis of analyzing the legal and institutional problems hidden behind the form of tort and the plight of right relief, the author finally seeks the remedy of administrative procedural law for infringement of the right to use public property, and from the scope of the case, the plaintiff's qualification. The choice of litigation type and the angle of state compensation open a way for the remedy of administrative procedural law of public property utilization. This paper makes a great use of the case analysis method and provides a strong support to the viewpoint of the article through the analysis of specific cases. By using the method of comparative analysis, this paper makes a comparative study on the public property system, analyzes and evaluates the different viewpoints of Chinese and foreign scholars on the same issue, and draws lessons from the theory of public property and related systems in Germany, Japan and Taiwan. Combining with our country's current judicial practice, some feasible suggestions are put forward to remedy the right in the use of public property.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 梁慧星;;道路管理瑕疵的賠償責(zé)任——大風(fēng)吹斷路旁護(hù)路樹砸死行人案評釋[J];法學(xué)研究;1991年05期

2 楊小君;國家賠償?shù)臍w責(zé)原則與歸責(zé)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];法學(xué)研究;2003年02期

3 辛巍巍;;法、德兩國公產(chǎn)法律制度考察[J];平頂山學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年04期

4 梁君瑜;;聚焦基本權(quán)利之第三者效力理論——以基本權(quán)利之二重性質(zhì)對該理論的影響為切入[J];研究生法學(xué);2013年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 呂瑞云;公法法人財產(chǎn)所有權(quán)問題研究[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2011年

，

本文編號：1567158