本文關(guān)鍵詞： 安全生產(chǎn)事故 請(qǐng)求競(jìng)合 人身?yè)p害賠償 工傷保險(xiǎn)賠償　出處：《北京交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)當(dāng)下的安全生產(chǎn)形勢(shì)仍舊異常嚴(yán)峻,對(duì)于事故中受難者的救濟(jì)問(wèn)題也不容忽視。就我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的法律規(guī)定與社會(huì)救濟(jì)制度來(lái)說(shuō),事故受難者往往同時(shí)享有人損與工傷兩種不同的賠償請(qǐng)求。很多學(xué)者傾向于是請(qǐng)求權(quán)上的競(jìng)合,對(duì)于這樣的看法,本文并不認(rèn)同。而在兩種賠償請(qǐng)求發(fā)生競(jìng)合時(shí)的處理問(wèn)題上,當(dāng)下學(xué)界也有很多不同的看法,立法與司法上也沒能有一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的答案。在安全生產(chǎn)事故的賠償請(qǐng)求發(fā)生競(jìng)合之時(shí),來(lái)自國(guó)家最高立法、司法等權(quán)力機(jī)關(guān)選擇回避的態(tài)度,一些或模棱兩可或參差次不齊的規(guī)章規(guī)定,無(wú)疑從心理上、經(jīng)濟(jì)上對(duì)于那些事故的弱勢(shì)受害者群體造成難以彌補(bǔ)的二次傷害。本文首先通過(guò)典型案例的引入,從法院兩審判決中引出文章的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn):當(dāng)安全生產(chǎn)事故受難者在工傷待遇與人損賠償兩種請(qǐng)求發(fā)生沖突時(shí)該怎樣解決。為了解決這一問(wèn)題,文章開始對(duì)于這些請(qǐng)求權(quán)在制度起源、責(zé)任類型、沖突競(jìng)合根源等角度進(jìn)行比較,并對(duì)比它們各自在適用上的優(yōu)勢(shì)與不足。并提出現(xiàn)有法律在適用上的問(wèn)題,為提出合理的處理模式作鋪墊。接著,通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)當(dāng)下各地方法院的司法實(shí)務(wù)現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行研究與歸納。綜合上述對(duì)于賠償請(qǐng)求競(jìng)合的分析,得出結(jié)論。通過(guò)研究本文認(rèn)為,人身?yè)p害賠償與工傷保險(xiǎn)賠償之間不應(yīng)當(dāng)有適用次序上的限制,在其賠償請(qǐng)求發(fā)生競(jìng)合時(shí)的處理模式上,應(yīng)當(dāng)采取部分補(bǔ)充部分兼得模式的基本原則,并且對(duì)于少數(shù)無(wú)第三人侵權(quán)且單位無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)的情況下,輔佐以適用替代模式。
[Abstract]:The current situation of safety in production in our country is still extremely severe, and the problem of relief for the victims of the accident should not be ignored. As far as the existing legal provisions and social relief systems are concerned, The victims of accidents often have two different claims for compensation at the same time. Many scholars tend to compete on the right of claim. This paper does not agree with this view. However, in the case of the two kinds of claims, when they are competing for compensation, many scholars do not agree with this view, but on the issue of how to deal with the two kinds of claims when they are competing for compensation. At present, there are many different views in academic circles, and there is no uniform answer between legislation and judicature. When the claims for compensation for accidents of production safety occur, they come from the highest legislative and judicial authorities in the country and choose to evade their attitude. There is no doubt that some of the rules and regulations, which are ambiguous or uneven, cause irreparable secondary injury to the vulnerable groups of victims of the accident, both psychologically and economically. First of all, through the introduction of typical cases, The controversial point of the article is drawn from the court's two trial decisions: how to resolve the conflict between the work-related injury treatment and the compensation for damages when the victims of the safety of production accident have two kinds of claims, in order to solve this problem, The article begins to compare these claims in terms of the origin of the system, the type of responsibility, the source of conflict, and so on, and compares their respective advantages and disadvantages in the application of the law, and puts forward the problems of the application of the existing law. In order to put forward a reasonable treatment model. Then, through the research and induction of the current judicial practice of the local courts in China, synthesizing the above analysis for the competing claims, draw a conclusion. Through the study of this paper, There should be no restrictions on the order of application between the compensation for personal injury and the compensation for industrial injury insurance. And for a few cases where no third party infringes and the unit is not at fault, the alternative mode is applied.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D920.5;D922.54

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;統(tǒng)一領(lǐng)導(dǎo) 分類管理 分級(jí)負(fù)責(zé) 協(xié)同應(yīng)對(duì)——《國(guó)家安全生產(chǎn)事故災(zāi)難應(yīng)急預(yù)案》解讀[J];中國(guó)應(yīng)急管理;2007年04期

2 張學(xué)成;;應(yīng)對(duì)和處理安全生產(chǎn)事故:轉(zhuǎn)型中的歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義研究;2012年02期

3 ;浙江省人民政府辦公廳轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)省安全生產(chǎn)監(jiān)督管理局關(guān)于浙江省安全生產(chǎn)事故報(bào)告和調(diào)查處理暫行規(guī)定的通知[J];浙江政報(bào);2004年32期

4 ;2001年重大安全生產(chǎn)事故[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號(hào)：1520863