本文關(guān)鍵詞： 食品安全法》 懲罰性賠償 責(zé)任承擔(dān) 構(gòu)成要件　出處：《山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2015年4月7日,新的《食品安全法》千呼萬(wàn)喚始出來(lái)。新法出臺(tái)以后,食品安全領(lǐng)域的懲罰性賠償制度又一度成為了大家熱議之話(huà)題。這次懲罰性賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的改進(jìn),對(duì)于中國(guó)食品安全領(lǐng)域進(jìn)一步發(fā)展無(wú)疑又是一次重大突破。但是,在經(jīng)濟(jì)迅猛發(fā)展的背景之下,我國(guó)食品安全領(lǐng)域的眾多食品安全問(wèn)題仍然沒(méi)有辦法得到解決。從生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)者的角度來(lái)看,食品安全領(lǐng)域懲罰性賠償制度就像是一顆定時(shí)炸彈一樣,無(wú)時(shí)無(wú)刻不在警示和威懾著生產(chǎn)者和銷(xiāo)售者;從消費(fèi)者的角度來(lái)看,完善的懲罰性賠償機(jī)制的設(shè)立更能促進(jìn)他們利用訴訟的手段來(lái)保護(hù)自己的合法權(quán)益。社會(huì)是向前發(fā)展的,任何法律法規(guī)均有可能存在著不足之處,它只能規(guī)制已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)的和我們能夠預(yù)料到的問(wèn)題,所以我們應(yīng)當(dāng)全方位的去看待和認(rèn)識(shí)它。本文從我國(guó)的食品安全領(lǐng)域的懲罰性賠償制度出發(fā),對(duì)現(xiàn)有制度進(jìn)行分析研究,提出這項(xiàng)制度在實(shí)際適用當(dāng)中存在的一些問(wèn)題,及其自己的有關(guān)看法與建議。第一部分是對(duì)選題的背景和意義、國(guó)內(nèi)外專(zhuān)家學(xué)者對(duì)該領(lǐng)域相關(guān)問(wèn)題的觀(guān)點(diǎn)以及創(chuàng)作該文章所用的方法進(jìn)行的陳述。第二部分對(duì)我國(guó)食品安全懲罰性賠償制度進(jìn)行了基本介紹,還對(duì)相關(guān)的制度概念、本身的特征和功能進(jìn)行介紹,進(jìn)一步深入了解這一制度。第三部分主要是對(duì)國(guó)外和中國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)食品安全領(lǐng)域懲罰性賠償制度進(jìn)行了介紹,分別介紹了美國(guó)、德國(guó)和我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)有關(guān)的食品安全領(lǐng)域的懲罰性賠償制度,從中借鑒到它們的法律經(jīng)驗(yàn),來(lái)完善我國(guó)對(duì)于該項(xiàng)制度的建設(shè)。第四部分是現(xiàn)階段中國(guó)食品安全懲罰性賠償制度的立法現(xiàn)狀與實(shí)施現(xiàn)狀,經(jīng)過(guò)對(duì)比,探究我國(guó)的食品安全懲罰性制度在現(xiàn)階段究竟存在哪些問(wèn)題,從而也凸顯出食品安全懲罰性賠償制度要改革前進(jìn)的迫切性。第五部分提出了對(duì)于中國(guó)食品安全懲罰性賠償制度在今后發(fā)展過(guò)程中一些完善建議。
[Abstract]:In April 7th 2015, the new Food Safety Law began to emerge. After the new law was enacted, the punitive damages system in the field of food safety became a hot topic for discussion. This time, the standard of punitive damages has been improved. There is no doubt that the further development of food safety in China is another major breakthrough. However, in the context of rapid economic development, Many food safety problems in the field of food safety in China still cannot be solved. From the point of view of the producers and operators, the punitive damages system in the field of food safety is like a ticking time bomb. From the consumer's point of view, the establishment of a perfect punitive damages mechanism can promote them to use the means of litigation to protect their legitimate rights and interests. Any laws and regulations may have shortcomings, it can only regulate the problems that have emerged and we can expect. Therefore, we should look at it in all directions and understand it. Starting from the punitive damages system in the field of food safety in China, this paper analyzes and studies the existing system, and puts forward some problems existing in the practical application of this system. And its own views and suggestions. The first part is the background and significance of the topic, The views of experts and scholars at home and abroad on the relevant issues in this field and the methods used to create this article are stated. The second part gives a basic introduction to the punitive damages system for food safety in China, as well as the related system concepts. The third part mainly introduces the punitive damages system in the field of food safety in foreign countries and Taiwan, and introduces the United States, respectively. The punitive damages system in the field of food safety in Germany and Taiwan has drawn lessons from their legal experience. To improve the construction of this system in our country. Part 4th is the current legislative status and implementation status of the punitive damages system for food safety in China at the present stage. What are the problems in the punitive system of food safety in China at this stage? Therefore, it also highlights the urgency of reforming the food safety punitive damages system. Part 5th puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the food safety punitive damages system in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.16

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姚保松,肖國(guó)興;我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];河南商業(yè)高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

2 劉仲秋,王賀洋;懲罰性賠償制度的應(yīng)用[J];西南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期

3 程愛(ài)軍;;懲罰性賠償制度的民族適應(yīng)性分析[J];中共太原市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

4 龔斌;;論我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度的立法完善[J];湖南財(cái)經(jīng)高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

5 陽(yáng)高峰;朱玉;;論我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度的建立[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2006年28期

6 于斌;;懲罰性賠償制度研究[J];科技經(jīng)濟(jì)市場(chǎng);2006年12期

7 房文靜;;淺論我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度的建立[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年01期

8 邢希萌;;淺談懲罰性賠償制度的完善[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2007年06期

9 于朝印;;美國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度探析——兼論懲罰性賠償制度在我國(guó)立法中的確立[J];中國(guó)礦業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

10 李杰;;對(duì)懲罰性賠償制度的思考[J];畢節(jié)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前9條

1 柯新華;;試論我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度的構(gòu)建[A];規(guī)劃·規(guī)范·規(guī)則——第六屆中國(guó)律師論壇優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2006年

2 羅冠杰;;論懲罰性賠償制度在我國(guó)藥品安全責(zé)任領(lǐng)域的建立[A];2009年中國(guó)藥學(xué)會(huì)藥事管理專(zhuān)業(yè)委員會(huì)年會(huì)暨“國(guó)家藥物政策與《藥品管理法》修訂研究”論壇論文文集[C];2009年

3 王阿麗;;商品房買(mǎi)賣(mài)中懲罰性賠償制度分析[A];規(guī)劃·規(guī)范·規(guī)則——第六屆中國(guó)律師論壇優(yōu)秀論文集[C];2006年

4 沈薇;;論電視購(gòu)物買(mǎi)賣(mài)中的懲罰性賠償制度[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二○一○年第1輯）[C];2010年

5 趙欣怡;;《環(huán)境保護(hù)法》修改之環(huán)境法律責(zé)任的完善——淺析懲罰性賠償制度對(duì)環(huán)境民事侵權(quán)責(zé)任的借鑒[A];可持續(xù)發(fā)展·環(huán)境保護(hù)·防災(zāi)減災(zāi)——2012年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研究會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集[C];2012年

6 周晉凌;李s，

本文編號(hào)：1518514