本文關(guān)鍵詞： 噪聲擾民 不履行法定職責(zé) 公權(quán)力 管控　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：廣場(chǎng)舞作為民間流行的一種健身形式，在全國(guó)各地蓬勃發(fā)展，給人們的身心健康帶來(lái)積極的作用。然而隨之而來(lái)的負(fù)面影響也日益突顯，噪聲擾民已成為近年來(lái)人們反映投訴的熱點(diǎn)，這一行為構(gòu)成了對(duì)公民休息權(quán)的侵害，已不容忽視，這就向公權(quán)力提出了必須加強(qiáng)噪聲擾民的管控要求。在實(shí)務(wù)中如何作為才能切實(shí)維護(hù)公民的合法權(quán)益，是本文進(jìn)行探討的出發(fā)點(diǎn)。本文選取的案例系一城市居民周某因其所住小區(qū)樓棟下附近居民跳廣場(chǎng)舞產(chǎn)生的音響聲音過(guò)大，影響了其生活，報(bào)警求助公安機(jī)關(guān)，盡管公安機(jī)關(guān)在受理后多方展開(kāi)調(diào)查、協(xié)調(diào)，但周某報(bào)警反映的事情一直沒(méi)有處理結(jié)果，周某將該公安分局訴至人民法院。近年來(lái)，侵權(quán)受害者因噪聲擾民多采取私力自救，此案則成為因廣場(chǎng)舞噪聲擾民訴公權(quán)力部門(mén)的第一案。一方面說(shuō)明我國(guó)公民法律意識(shí)逐漸增強(qiáng)；另一方面，更重要的是公權(quán)力對(duì)此類(lèi)擾民行為不能再放任不管，任其發(fā)展，必須采取有效措施加以管理。在此類(lèi)案件中，行政機(jī)關(guān)和行政相對(duì)人通常會(huì)就查處噪聲擾民行為是否屬于法定職責(zé)、行政處罰是否適用此類(lèi)案件等問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生分歧。 我們以這一系列爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)為出發(fā)點(diǎn)展開(kāi)論述，對(duì)噪聲擾民行為進(jìn)行定義，對(duì)公權(quán)力部門(mén)查處噪聲擾民行為的法定職責(zé)進(jìn)行解讀，從不履行法定職責(zé)的四種表現(xiàn)形式以及區(qū)別行政不作為和行政不履行法定職責(zé)對(duì)本案的行政執(zhí)法主體行為進(jìn)行界定，對(duì)履職程度進(jìn)行分析判斷，提出本案中公安機(jī)關(guān)查處噪聲擾民行為屬于不完全履行法定職責(zé)，，應(yīng)當(dāng)在法定期限內(nèi)對(duì)公民就廣場(chǎng)舞噪聲擾民報(bào)警依法完全履行法定職責(zé)的結(jié)論。針對(duì)我國(guó)對(duì)廣場(chǎng)舞噪聲擾民的法律規(guī)制存在不完善之處，現(xiàn)行法律運(yùn)行中存在諸多問(wèn)題，公權(quán)力行政管控乏力，因此，本案的主要研究意義還在于如何加強(qiáng)公權(quán)力對(duì)噪聲行為的管控能力。在分析的基礎(chǔ)上，我們提出了應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)噪聲擾民行為進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制以及從立法層面加強(qiáng)制定配套的規(guī)范性文件、明確各行政主體的職責(zé)、加強(qiáng)執(zhí)法監(jiān)督、完善救濟(jì)措施、提升政府對(duì)城市公共空間的管控能力等對(duì)策。
[Abstract]:Square dance, as a popular form of fitness, has been developing vigorously all over the country and has brought positive effects to people's physical and mental health. However, the negative impact has become increasingly prominent. Noise disturbing people has become a hot spot for people to respond to complaints in recent years. This behavior constitutes an infringement of citizens' right to rest and cannot be ignored. This puts forward to the public power the need to strengthen the control and control of noise disturbing the people. In practice, how can we effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of citizens? This is the starting point of this discussion. The case selected in this paper is a case of a city resident Zhou Mou who, because of the sound sound produced by residents dancing in a square dance under the building of his residential district, has affected his life and called the police to seek help from the public security organ. Although the public security organs carried out investigations and coordinated in various ways after accepting the report, the incident reported by Zhou to the police has not been dealt with. Zhou took the public security bureau to the people's court. In recent years, the victims of infringement have taken private efforts to help themselves because of the noise that disturbs the people. This case became the first case in which the square dance noise disturbed the people v. the public power department. On the one hand, it showed that our citizens' legal consciousness was gradually increasing; on the other hand, what was more important was that public power could no longer allow this kind of disturbing behavior to go unchecked, allowing it to develop. It is necessary to take effective measures to manage such cases. In such cases, administrative organs and administrative counterparts usually have differences on whether it is a legal duty to investigate and deal with acts of noise and disturbance, and whether administrative penalties are applicable to such cases. We start with this series of controversy as the starting point, define the behavior of noise disturbing people, and interpret the statutory duty of the public power department to investigate and deal with the behavior of noise disturbing people. From the four manifestations of failure to perform legal duties and the distinction between administrative omission and administrative failure to perform statutory duties, the main acts of administrative law enforcement in this case are defined, and the degree of performance of duties is analyzed and judged. It is proposed that the investigation and punishment by public security organs of acts of noise and disturbance in this case are not fully performed in accordance with their statutory duties. The conclusion that citizens should fully perform their legal duties in accordance with the law should be given within the legal time limit. In view of the imperfections in the legal regulation of noise disturbance in square dancing in our country, there are many problems in the current legal operation. The administrative control of public power is weak, therefore, the main research significance of this case lies in how to strengthen the public power's ability to control noise behavior. We put forward that we should regulate the behavior of noise disturbance by law, strengthen the formulation of supporting normative documents from the legislative level, clarify the responsibilities of each administrative body, strengthen the supervision of law enforcement, and improve the relief measures. Improve the government's ability to control urban public space and other countermeasures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 應(yīng)彥芬;孫毅;;淺議公安機(jī)關(guān)在環(huán)境噪聲污染防治工作中的職責(zé)[J];公安學(xué)刊.浙江公安高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期

2 劉毅;;公安機(jī)關(guān)噪聲污染防治工作研究[J];公安學(xué)刊(浙江警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2010年04期

3 陳晗婧;;對(duì)生活噪聲擾人行為實(shí)施警察行政管理與處罰的探討[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

4 李艷紅;王希江;;我國(guó)公權(quán)力法治化思考[J];理論探索;2010年04期

5 左曉飛;;不履行特定作為義務(wù)之行政行為及其司法審查[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(高等教育版);2008年03期

6 楊燕飛;;淺析“不履行法定職責(zé)”[J];天水行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

7 史友興;;當(dāng)健身權(quán)遭遇休息權(quán)[J];檢察風(fēng)云;2009年05期

8 曹福春;劉鶴;;行政不作為與行政不履行法定職責(zé)界定[J];延邊大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

9 程思良;;休息權(quán)初探[J];云夢(mèng)學(xué)刊;2007年02期

10 周佑勇;行政不作為構(gòu)成要件的展開(kāi)[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2001年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張勝軍;我國(guó)行政程序法治化的對(duì)策研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：1501134