本文關鍵詞： 網絡募捐 法律地位 連帶責任　出處：《甘肅政法學院》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隨著互聯(lián)網時代的到來,網絡募捐成為一個熱門話題進入到了人們的視野當中,越來越多的人可以通過網絡進行慈善捐助。然而,網絡募捐帶來便利的同時,也伴隨著許多詐捐騙捐現象的發(fā)生。由此引發(fā)的一系列法律問題均值得我們深思,如網絡募捐平臺作為網絡服務提供者處于何種法律地位,在進行募捐的過程中應當履行怎樣的義務,出現詐捐、騙捐事件時網絡募捐平臺應承擔什么樣的民事責任等問題理應進行深入的思考。現實中,我國《慈善法》中并沒有對網絡募捐平臺做出相應的義務性規(guī)定,于是學界對前述問題的觀點便具有了可爭議的空間。因此,本文嘗試從民法的角度出發(fā),對網絡募捐平臺的法律地位、民事義務和法律責任承擔進行必要分析與闡述。主要內容如下述:第一章,主要介紹了網絡募捐的特征和兩種發(fā)起模式,即個人直接發(fā)起模式和個人與慈善組織共同發(fā)起模式,繼而引出影響網絡募捐平臺在民事責任承擔方面所存在的一些爭議。第二章,主要對影響網絡募捐平臺責任承擔的相關問題進行梳理分析。主要包括網絡募捐平臺的法律地位,有居間人說、網絡空間出租者說、代理人說等,并對前述觀點進行了闡述。隨后文章就網絡募捐平臺的義務方面提出自己的觀點并進行評析,本文認為網絡募捐平臺在募捐發(fā)起前或者募捐過程中應負有相應的審核義務和注意義務。第三章,主要對網絡募捐平臺單方責任之優(yōu)劣進行了分析,隨后又對網絡募捐平臺應承擔連帶責任進行了詳細的論證。
[Abstract]:With the advent of the Internet era, online fund-raising has become a hot topic into the eyes of people, more and more people can make charitable donations through the Internet. However, Internet fundraising brings convenience at the same time. With the occurrence of many fraudulent donation fraud phenomenon, a series of legal problems are worth pondering, such as the network donation platform as a network service provider in what kind of legal status. In the process of collecting donations, what kind of obligations should be fulfilled, there are fraud donation, when the network donation collection platform should bear the civil liability and other issues should be deeply considered. In reality. The charity law of our country does not have the corresponding obligation stipulation to the network collection platform, so the academic circles have the controversial space to the above-mentioned question viewpoint. Therefore, this article tries to proceed from the angle of the civil law. The legal status of the network fundraising platform, civil obligations and legal liability to undertake the necessary analysis and elaboration. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter, mainly introduces the characteristics of the network collection and the two modes of initiation. Namely the individual direct initiation mode and the individual and the charitable organization co-sponsor pattern, then leads to the influence network fund-raising platform in the civil liability assumption aspect some disputes. Chapter two. It mainly analyzes the related problems that affect the responsibility of the network fundraising platform. It mainly includes the legal status of the network fundraising platform, some people say, cyberspace renters say, agents say, and so on. Then the article puts forward its own views and comments on the obligations of the network fundraising platform. This paper thinks that the network fundraising platform should have the corresponding audit obligation and duty of attention before or during the launching of the collection. Chapter three mainly analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the unilateral responsibility of the network fundraising platform. Subsequently, the network fundraising platform should bear joint liability for a detailed demonstration.
【學位授予單位】：甘肅政法學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.182.3

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 方延明;追究連帶責任[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1486597