【摘要】：尋釁滋事罪作為危害社會管理秩序的罪名，在司法實踐之中使用的頻率相當(dāng)高。由于本罪犯罪構(gòu)成十分抽象，在判斷的時候因為缺乏具體標(biāo)準(zhǔn)從而導(dǎo)致司法實踐之中認(rèn)定存在著不規(guī)范的現(xiàn)象。九七年刑法中的流氓罪因為存在“口袋罪”而被取消，但是現(xiàn)如今尋釁滋事罪卻把適用范圍越擴越大，儼然成為了新的“口袋罪”。在司法實踐之中，往往存在著本來應(yīng)當(dāng)出罪最后卻入罪或者明明構(gòu)成犯罪卻出罪的情況，伴隨著這種情況的往往是司法人員主觀意志的甚至是司法腐敗。在現(xiàn)行尋釁滋事罪的犯罪構(gòu)成之下，由于缺乏可以量化的標(biāo)桿而導(dǎo)致司法人員主觀性大大增強，容易致使冤假錯案的發(fā)生。本文就尋釁滋事罪本身的構(gòu)成要件進行分析并且對能否在刑法之中廢除尋釁滋事罪來進行討論，希望能在刑法之中徹底廢除尋釁滋事罪，同時對本罪廢除后應(yīng)當(dāng)采取的措施提出建議，藉此希望完善我國刑法體系，，達到最終保障人權(quán)的目的。是否廢除尋釁滋事罪的討論，是關(guān)于我國立法科學(xué)化和實現(xiàn)依法治國的重要保證。
[Abstract]:As a crime of endangering the social management order, the crime of aggression and nuisance is used frequently in judicial practice. Because the constitution of this crime is very abstract, because of the lack of specific standards in judgment, there is a phenomenon of irregularity in judicial practice. In 1997, the crime of hooliganism in criminal law was abolished because of the existence of "pocket crime", but now the crime of provoking and causing trouble has expanded the scope of application more and more, as if it had become a new "pocket crime". In judicial practice, there is always a situation that should have committed a crime at the end of the crime, or if it constitutes a crime, it is often accompanied by the subjective will of judicial personnel and even judicial corruption. Due to the lack of quantifiable benchmarking, the subjectivity of judicial personnel is greatly enhanced, which can easily lead to the occurrence of miscarriage of justice. This article analyzes the constituent elements of the crime of provoking and causing trouble and discusses whether it can be abolished in the criminal law, hoping that the crime of provoking and causing trouble can be completely abolished in the criminal law. At the same time, the author puts forward some suggestions on the measures to be taken after the abrogation of this crime in order to perfect the criminal law system of our country and to achieve the goal of protecting human rights finally. The discussion on whether to abolish the crime of provoking and causing trouble is an important guarantee for the scientific legislation and the realization of ruling the country according to law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉愫貞;;論明清立法語體的規(guī)范化特征[J];畢節(jié)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期

2 辛逸;;人民公社研究述評[J];當(dāng)代中國史研究;2008年01期

3 陸煜穎;;從死而不僵的“流氓罪”看制度之弊[J];法制與社會;2011年35期

4 曹旅寧;秦律研究綜述[J];廣東教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年01期

5 李云虹;;流氓罪的前世今生[J];法律與生活;2011年03期

6 于志剛;;口袋罪的時代變遷、當(dāng)前亂象與消減思路[J];法學(xué)家;2013年03期

7 張成利;;尋釁滋事罪傳統(tǒng)認(rèn)定的缺陷[J];法制與社會;2013年32期

8 吳家林;;談我國刑法尋釁滋事罪的完善[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年01期

9 李大勇;;謠言、言論自由與法律規(guī)制[J];法學(xué);2014年01期

10 董紹靜;;尋釁滋事罪此罪與彼罪的認(rèn)定[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張維;尋釁滋事罪問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：2468008