【摘要】："入罪免刑"作為刑事法上的一種例外,在各國(guó)的規(guī)定中并不罕見(jiàn),與德日刑法的規(guī)定、判例相比較,雖然我國(guó)由于在犯罪概念、刑事制度設(shè)置上的差異對(duì)德日刑法的相關(guān)規(guī)定而有所取舍,但本質(zhì)上仍屬于對(duì)刑罰的最終手段性的反思而阻卻刑罰。我國(guó)的免予刑事處罰規(guī)定偏重于帶有"可罰的違法性"特征,特別是我國(guó)《刑法》第37條所規(guī)定的"免予刑事處罰"的一般性條款,更是使所有"犯罪情節(jié)輕微"的犯罪"可以"免予刑事處罰。我國(guó)的免予刑事處罰的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)模糊,需要通過(guò)解釋對(duì)"犯罪情節(jié)輕微"要件具體限定,將免予刑事處罰的判斷放在量刑判斷的一般原則和規(guī)則、刑罰目的的實(shí)現(xiàn)和刑罰制度的有序性之中,進(jìn)而需要通過(guò)規(guī)范的評(píng)價(jià)將其理論根據(jù)從"可罰的違法"衍生到"可罰的責(zé)任"領(lǐng)域,從根本上明確免予刑事處罰該措施的實(shí)質(zhì)立場(chǎng)。
[Abstract]:As an exception in criminal law, "exemption from conviction" is not uncommon in the regulations of various countries. Compared with the provisions and jurisprudence of German and Japanese criminal law, although the concept of crime in our country is due to the concept of crime, The difference in the setting of the criminal system makes some choices to the relevant provisions of the German-Japanese criminal law, but it still belongs to the reflection on the final segment of the penalty and the hindrance of the penalty in essence. The provision of exemption from criminal punishment in our country favours the feature of "punishable illegality", in particular the general provision of "exemption from criminal punishment" provided for in article 37 of the Criminal Code of our country, Moreover, all "minor" crimes "can be exempted from criminal punishment." In our country, the standard of exemption from criminal punishment is vague. It is necessary to put the judgment of exemption from criminal punishment in the general principles and rules of sentencing judgment by explaining the elements of "minor circumstances of crime" and putting the judgment of exemption from criminal punishment into the general principles and rules of sentencing judgment. In the realization of the purpose of penalty and the orderliness of penalty system, it is necessary to derive its theoretical basis from "punishable violation" to "punishable responsibility" field through normative evaluation. Fundamentally, it is clear that the substantive position of the measure is to be exempted from criminal punishment.
【作者單位】： 京都大學(xué);
【基金】：科學(xué)研究費(fèi)助成事業(yè)(特別研究員獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)費(fèi))“量刑娭の再i藍(lán)嗓藭ⅳ工雐，

本文編號(hào)：2462904