【摘要】：在我國，財產(chǎn)犯罪中的取得型財產(chǎn)犯罪、部分經(jīng)濟犯罪及貪污受賄犯罪均要求以非法占有目的為構(gòu)成要件，不同國家對此問題也存在著不同的理解和規(guī)定，本文的研究范圍限定在財產(chǎn)犯罪之內(nèi)。非法占有目的是刑法中一個非常重要的概念，，財產(chǎn)犯罪中的非法占有目的通常認為具有區(qū)分罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪的重要功能，但同時也存在著不少質(zhì)疑之聲，兩種意見的爭論幾乎關(guān)涉到非法占有目的的所有研究問題。因此，在非法占有目的于財產(chǎn)犯罪是否必要的爭論探討下，厘清爭議焦點問題，對相關(guān)問題予以系統(tǒng)梳理，對理論的發(fā)展與實踐問題的解決都具有十分重要的意義。本文以此為基本指導思想，從財產(chǎn)犯罪中非法占有目的的必要性討論出發(fā)，針對非法占有目的的地位、功能和內(nèi)涵進行了理論上的探討，總結(jié)關(guān)涉非法占有目的中的實踐難題，并運用上述理論予以說明、論證和解決。 本文的結(jié)構(gòu)和主要內(nèi)容如下： 第一部分，非法占有目的在財產(chǎn)犯罪中的地位。本部分先將關(guān)于討論非法占有目的是否必要的學說予以述明，最終立足我國實際，結(jié)合財產(chǎn)犯罪特點得出非法占有目的對財產(chǎn)犯罪是必要的結(jié)論。在確定了非法占有目的在財產(chǎn)犯罪宏觀上的地位后，深入探討同樣作為主觀要素的犯罪故意與非法占有目的的關(guān)系，通過介紹目的犯和犯罪故意的基本原理，得出結(jié)論：非法占有目的是獨立于犯罪故意的主觀超過要素。 第二部分，財產(chǎn)犯罪中非法占有目的的內(nèi)涵。在確定了非法占有目的的地位后，繼續(xù)分析非法占有目的的內(nèi)涵。首先介紹了國外對于非法占有目的內(nèi)涵的界定情況，分為大陸法系和英美法系兩部分。接著介紹我國對非法占有目的內(nèi)涵理解的學說并對其進行評析。最終，綜合國內(nèi)外學說觀點，立足我國實踐，認為我國財產(chǎn)犯罪的非法占有目的的內(nèi)涵可以選擇適用日本的通說，即同時包含排除意思與利用意思。 第三部分，非法占有目的的實踐問題展開。財產(chǎn)犯罪的非法占有目的研究最終定位是解決實踐問題。針對實踐中常見和多發(fā)的使用盜竊行為和行使權(quán)利行為，由于其行為方式與財產(chǎn)犯罪的行為方式相似，因此，如何認定其行為性質(zhì)在理論及實踐中也普遍存在著爭議。與此同時，實踐中還存在這樣一個認定難題，即基于毀壞目的竊取他人財物后予以毀壞的行為，對該行為的認定過程能夠體現(xiàn)出非法占有目的具有區(qū)分盜竊罪與故意毀壞財物罪的功能。本部分通過比較分析理論上的不同觀點，結(jié)合我國司法實踐對該問題的處置現(xiàn)狀，運用上述理論來論證非法占有目的為解決其定性問題的關(guān)鍵。
[Abstract]:In our country, the acquisitive property crime in the property crime, some economic crimes and the embezzlement and bribery crime all require the purpose of illegal possession as the constituent element, and different countries have different understandings and regulations on this problem. The research scope of this paper is limited to property crime. The purpose of illegal possession is a very important concept in criminal law. The purpose of illegal possession of property crime is generally regarded as having the distinction between crime and non-crime, which is an important function of this crime and other crime, but there are also many voices of doubt at the same time. The dispute between the two views concerns almost all the research issues concerning the purpose of illegal possession. Therefore, it is of great significance for the development of theory and the solution of practical problems to clarify the focus of disputes and sort out the related problems systematically under the discussion of whether it is necessary for the purpose of illegal possession to commit to the crime of property. Taking this as the basic guiding ideology, this paper discusses the necessity of illegal possession purpose in the crime of property, probes into the position, function and connotation of illegal possession purpose in theory, and sums up the practical problems related to the purpose of illegal possession. And use the above theory to explain, demonstrate and solve. The structure and main contents of this paper are as follows: the first part, the position of the purpose of illegal possession in the crime of property. In this part, the theory about whether it is necessary to discuss the purpose of illegal possession is stated, and finally, based on the reality of our country, the conclusion that the purpose of illegal possession is necessary to the crime of property is drawn according to the characteristics of the crime of property. After determining the macro-position of the purpose of illegal possession in property crime, this paper probes into the relationship between the intention of crime and the purpose of illegal possession, which is also a subjective factor, and introduces the basic principles of the crime of purpose and the intention of crime. The conclusion is that the purpose of illegal possession is independent of the subjective element of criminal intention. The second part is the connotation of the purpose of illegal possession in the crime of property. After confirming the position of the purpose of illegal possession, the connotation of the purpose of illegal possession is further analyzed. Firstly, this paper introduces the definition of the purpose of illegal possession abroad, which is divided into two parts: civil law system and Anglo-American law system. Then it introduces the theory of understanding the purpose of illegal possession in our country and comments on it. Finally, based on the practice of our country, the author thinks that the connotation of the purpose of illegal possession of property crime in our country can be chosen to apply to the general theory of Japan, that is to say, the meaning of exclusion and the meaning of utilization can be included at the same time. The third part, the illegal possession of the purpose of the practice of the problem unfolding. The final orientation of the purpose of illegal possession of property crime is to solve the practical problems. In view of the common and frequent use of theft and the exercise of rights in practice, because its behavior is similar to that of property crime, how to determine the nature of its behavior is also generally controversial in theory and practice. At the same time, there is also a difficult problem in practice, namely, the act of stealing other people's property for the purpose of destruction and then destroying it. The cognizance process of this act can show that the purpose of illegal possession has the function of distinguishing the crime of theft from the crime of wilful destruction of property. By comparing and analyzing different viewpoints in theory and combining with the present situation of judicial practice in our country, this part proves that the purpose of illegal possession is the key to solve the qualitative problem by using the above-mentioned theory to prove that the purpose of illegal possession is the key to solving its qualitative problem.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.35


本文編號：2461223