【摘要】：食品監(jiān)管瀆職罪是《刑法修正案（八）》新增設(shè)的罪名，其目的在于維護國家食品監(jiān)管正常秩序，，保護公眾生命健康和財產(chǎn)安全。作為一項新的罪名，該罪在犯罪構(gòu)成、法律適用上還存在著諸多的問題和爭論。本文對此從理論及實踐兩方面展開分析與探討，提出筆者的觀點和建議。 本文共分四個部分：第一部分從食品監(jiān)管瀆職罪的立法背景和罪名確定入手，概述了本罪設(shè)置的必要性，分析了罪名確定的妥當性。第二部分從本罪的主體、危害行為、危害結(jié)果及罪過形式等方面入手，細致分析了本罪的主客觀要件，為本文的研究奠定了基礎(chǔ)。第三部分則從司法實務(wù)出發(fā)，對具體法律適用中存在的一些疑難問題進行了解析，提出了相對明確、合理的觀點。最后，針對在立法和司法實踐中存在的不足，提出了幾點立法完善的建議，以期對該罪的立法和司法實踐均有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The crime of malfeasance in food supervision is a new crime in Criminal Law Amendment (8). Its purpose is to maintain the normal order of national food supervision and protect public life and health and property safety. As a new crime, there are still many problems and controversies in the constitution and application of law. This paper analyzes and probes into this from both theoretical and practical aspects, and puts forward the author's views and suggestions. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part starts with the legislative background and the definition of the crime of food supervision dereliction of duty, summarizes the necessity of setting up the crime, and analyzes the appropriateness of the crime determination. The second part analyzes the subjective and objective elements of the crime from the aspects of the subject of the crime, the act of harm, the result of the harm and the form of the crime, which lays a foundation for the research of this paper. The third part, starting from the judicial practice, analyzes some difficult problems existing in the application of specific laws, and puts forward a relatively clear and reasonable point of view. Finally, in view of the shortcomings in the legislation and judicial practice, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the perfection of the legislation in order to benefit both the legislation and the judicial practice of the crime.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳興良;;刑法競合論[J];法商研究;2006年02期

2 張明楷;;法條競合中特別關(guān)系的確定與處理[J];法學家;2011年01期

3 儲槐植,楊書文;復合罪過形式探析——刑法理論對現(xiàn)行刑法內(nèi)含的新法律現(xiàn)象之解讀[J];法學研究;1999年01期

本文編號：2459198