【摘要】：犯罪故意的認識對象是犯罪主觀方面中一個具有客觀屬性的范圍,包括"行為"、"會"、"危害社會的結(jié)果"。其中"會"、"危害社會的結(jié)果"屬于規(guī)范性要素。規(guī)范性的價值判斷必須以一定的客觀依據(jù)為標準才能形成普適性準則。因此,在對"會"即危害結(jié)果發(fā)生概率的判斷標準上,應(yīng)當采取蓋然性說和一般人標準;對"危害社會的結(jié)果"即行為當時對行為或后果的程度判斷上,應(yīng)當采取抽象的法益侵犯說。且由于違法性認識在現(xiàn)有的刑法體系中具有獨特的地位和作用,并不等同于社會危害性,故不能將違法性認識認定為犯罪故意的認識對象。
[Abstract]:The cognition object of criminal intention is a scope with objective attribute in subjective aspect of crime, including "behavior", "meeting" and "the result of endangering society". Among them "the meeting", "the result that endangers the society" belongs to the normative element. Normative value judgment must be based on a certain objective basis to form a universal criterion. Therefore, in the judgment standard of "meeting", that is, the occurrence probability of the harm result, we should adopt the cover probability theory and the general person standard; Abstract legal interest infringement should be adopted to judge the extent to which the act or consequence is the result of endangering society at that time. And because the illegality cognition has a unique position and function in the existing criminal law system, it is not equal to the harm of the society, so the illegality cognition cannot be regarded as the cognition object of the criminal intention.
【作者單位】： 中國政法大學(xué)刑事司法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D924.3
，

本文編號：2441492