關(guān)于盜竊罪的理解和適用
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-02-22 13:49
【摘要】：《刑法修正案(八)》新增入戶盜竊、攜帶兇器盜竊、扒竊三種特殊的盜竊行為類型,使盜竊罪的罪狀上升為五種形式,且五種盜竊行為方式相互并列、相互獨(dú)立。修正案自2011年5月1日實(shí)施以來(lái),在保護(hù)人民財(cái)產(chǎn)安全、人身安全和維護(hù)社會(huì)公共秩序方面發(fā)揮了重要作用,但是關(guān)于如何正確理解和適用修正案下的盜竊罪尚存在一些沖突。為了在司法實(shí)踐中更好的理解和適用修正案下的盜竊罪,文章擬對(duì)盜竊罪行為類型中的“多次盜竊”、“入戶盜竊”、“攜帶兇器盜竊”以及“扒竊”等相關(guān)類型進(jìn)行解讀,并對(duì)如何正確適用修正案下的盜竊罪提出自己的見(jiàn)解。 本文分為引言、正文、結(jié)語(yǔ)三大部分。 引言部分通過(guò)扒竊1.5元被判刑的案例引出本文所要討論的主題,簡(jiǎn)述新舊法律對(duì)扒竊行為的不同規(guī)定；簡(jiǎn)要說(shuō)明新增盜竊行為形式的社會(huì)危害性以及入罪原因,淺析司法實(shí)務(wù)中一刀切入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的不合理性,并明確指出本文的主題：關(guān)于盜竊罪的理解和適用。 正文共有四章： 第一章,探討多次盜竊行為的認(rèn)定。首先介紹新舊司法解釋對(duì)“多次”的認(rèn)定；其次分析如何界定“次”數(shù),進(jìn)而討論成立多次盜竊是否有數(shù)額標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以及是否每次都要求達(dá)到既遂；最后分析多次盜竊與行政處罰的銜接性。 第二章,探討入戶盜竊行為。首先陳述入戶盜竊單獨(dú)入罪的理由；其次分析“入戶”這一動(dòng)態(tài)的詞語(yǔ)；接著提出對(duì)“戶”的界定,尤其是特殊場(chǎng)合下對(duì)“戶”的界定；最后探討入戶盜竊何時(shí)成立既遂。 第三章,探討攜帶兇器盜竊行為。首先對(duì)攜帶兇器盜竊入罪作合理性分析；進(jìn)而探討攜帶兇器盜竊和攜帶兇器搶劫的區(qū)別；接著詳細(xì)解析“攜帶”和“兇器”二詞；然后針對(duì)司法實(shí)踐中的幾點(diǎn)困惑作出探討；最后提到攜帶兇器盜竊的既遂情形。 第四章,探討扒竊行為。本章是本文的重點(diǎn)章節(jié)。首先陳述扒竊行為入罪的合理性；接著又從反面陳述扒竊入罪帶來(lái)的困擾；然后探析如何正確界定扒竊行為,其中涉及扒竊行為的基本要素,公共場(chǎng)所和貼身行竊；接著分析扒竊行為何時(shí)成立既遂；最后探析扒竊入罪的司法認(rèn)定,并指出扒竊入罪的立法完善。 結(jié)語(yǔ)部分,歸納文章內(nèi)容,闡明強(qiáng)調(diào)寫(xiě)作目的。
[Abstract]:The Criminal Law Amendment (8) > adds three special types of larceny: burglary, burglary with murder weapon and pickpocketing, which makes the crime of larceny rise to five forms, and the five ways of larceny are juxtaposed and independent of each other. Since its implementation on May 1, 2011, the Amendment has played an important role in protecting the safety of people's property, personal safety and maintaining public order, but there are still some conflicts on how to correctly understand and apply the crime of theft under the Amendment. In order to better understand and apply the crime of larceny under the amendment in judicial practice, the article intends to interpret the related types of larceny, such as "multiple theft", "burglary", "burglary with murder weapon" and "pickpocketing". And how to correctly apply the crime of theft under the amendment to put forward their own views. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. In the foreword part, the theme of this paper is drawn from the case that pickpocketing is sentenced by 1.5 yuan, and the different provisions of the new and old laws on pickpocketing behavior are briefly described. This paper briefly explains the social harmfulness of the new form of theft and the reasons for its incrimination, analyzes on the irrationality of the standard of one-size-fits-all in judicial practice, and points out clearly the theme of this article: the understanding and application of the crime of larceny. There are four chapters in the text: the first chapter discusses the identification of multiple theft. Firstly, it introduces the recognition of "many times" in the new and old judicial interpretations, secondly, analyzes how to define the number of "times", and then discusses whether there is a standard of amount for the establishment of multiple thefts, and whether it is required to achieve completion every time. Finally, it analyzes the connection between multiple theft and administrative punishment. Chapter two discusses burglary. Firstly, it states the reasons for the individual crime of burglary; secondly, it analyzes the dynamic words of "entering the house"; then it puts forward the definition of "household", especially the definition of "household" under special circumstances; finally, it probes into when the burglary is established. The third chapter discusses the theft with murder weapon. Firstly, the author analyzes the rationality of the crime of theft with the murder weapon; then probes into the difference between the theft with the murder weapon and the robbery with the weapon; then analyzes in detail the words "carry" and "murder weapon"; then probes into several puzzles in the judicial practice; Finally, the attempted case of theft with a murder weapon was mentioned. Chapter four discusses the behavior of pickpocketing. This chapter is the key chapter of this paper. Firstly, it states the reasonableness of the crime of pickpocketing, then states the troubles brought about by the crime of pickpocketing from the opposite side, then analyzes how to define the behavior of pickpocketing correctly, which involves the basic elements of the act of pickpocketing, the public place and the intimate burglary. Then it analyzes when pickpocketing is established, and finally analyzes the judicial cognizance of the crime of pickpocketing, and points out the legislative perfection of the crime of pickpocketing. The conclusion part summarizes the content of the article and clarifies the emphasis on the purpose of writing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.35
本文編號(hào)：2428290
[Abstract]:The Criminal Law Amendment (8) > adds three special types of larceny: burglary, burglary with murder weapon and pickpocketing, which makes the crime of larceny rise to five forms, and the five ways of larceny are juxtaposed and independent of each other. Since its implementation on May 1, 2011, the Amendment has played an important role in protecting the safety of people's property, personal safety and maintaining public order, but there are still some conflicts on how to correctly understand and apply the crime of theft under the Amendment. In order to better understand and apply the crime of larceny under the amendment in judicial practice, the article intends to interpret the related types of larceny, such as "multiple theft", "burglary", "burglary with murder weapon" and "pickpocketing". And how to correctly apply the crime of theft under the amendment to put forward their own views. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. In the foreword part, the theme of this paper is drawn from the case that pickpocketing is sentenced by 1.5 yuan, and the different provisions of the new and old laws on pickpocketing behavior are briefly described. This paper briefly explains the social harmfulness of the new form of theft and the reasons for its incrimination, analyzes on the irrationality of the standard of one-size-fits-all in judicial practice, and points out clearly the theme of this article: the understanding and application of the crime of larceny. There are four chapters in the text: the first chapter discusses the identification of multiple theft. Firstly, it introduces the recognition of "many times" in the new and old judicial interpretations, secondly, analyzes how to define the number of "times", and then discusses whether there is a standard of amount for the establishment of multiple thefts, and whether it is required to achieve completion every time. Finally, it analyzes the connection between multiple theft and administrative punishment. Chapter two discusses burglary. Firstly, it states the reasons for the individual crime of burglary; secondly, it analyzes the dynamic words of "entering the house"; then it puts forward the definition of "household", especially the definition of "household" under special circumstances; finally, it probes into when the burglary is established. The third chapter discusses the theft with murder weapon. Firstly, the author analyzes the rationality of the crime of theft with the murder weapon; then probes into the difference between the theft with the murder weapon and the robbery with the weapon; then analyzes in detail the words "carry" and "murder weapon"; then probes into several puzzles in the judicial practice; Finally, the attempted case of theft with a murder weapon was mentioned. Chapter four discusses the behavior of pickpocketing. This chapter is the key chapter of this paper. Firstly, it states the reasonableness of the crime of pickpocketing, then states the troubles brought about by the crime of pickpocketing from the opposite side, then analyzes how to define the behavior of pickpocketing correctly, which involves the basic elements of the act of pickpocketing, the public place and the intimate burglary. Then it analyzes when pickpocketing is established, and finally analyzes the judicial cognizance of the crime of pickpocketing, and points out the legislative perfection of the crime of pickpocketing. The conclusion part summarizes the content of the article and clarifies the emphasis on the purpose of writing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.35
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳家林;;論刑法中的扒竊——對(duì)《刑法修正案(八)》的分析與解讀[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年04期
2 肖中華;論搶劫罪適用中的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年05期
3 張明楷;簡(jiǎn)論“攜帶兇器搶奪”[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年04期
4 李云林;;簡(jiǎn)論攜帶兇器盜竊[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年19期
5 李振林;;嚴(yán)懲盜竊也應(yīng)有度——對(duì)《刑法修正案(八)》第39條規(guī)定之反思[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期
6 王占梅;;淺談入戶搶劫的司法認(rèn)定[J];廣西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年S2期
7 高翼飛;;非數(shù)額型盜竊罪法律適用問(wèn)題研究——兼評(píng)《刑法修正案(八)》第39條對(duì)司法實(shí)踐的影響[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年05期
8 張靜;景孝杰;;未成年人社會(huì)調(diào)查報(bào)告的定位與審查[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期
9 吳加明;;《刑法修正案(八)》中“扒竊”的司法實(shí)踐認(rèn)定[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年14期
10 黎宏;;論盜竊罪中的多次盜竊[J];人民檢察;2010年01期
，本文編號(hào)：2428290
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2428290.html
教材專著
