【摘要】：正2014年6月23日,最高人民法院在發(fā)布的27號指導案例——臧進泉等盜竊、詐騙案中表述:"行為人利用信息網(wǎng)絡(luò),誘騙他人點擊虛假鏈接而實際通過預(yù)先植入的計算機程序竊取財物構(gòu)成犯罪的,以盜竊罪定罪處罰;虛構(gòu)可供交易的商品或者服務(wù),欺騙他人點擊付款鏈接而騙取財物構(gòu)成犯罪的,以詐騙罪定罪處罰。"最高人民法院在裁判理由中從主要手段和處分意識兩方面區(qū)分盜竊罪與詐騙罪。盜竊罪的主要手段是秘密竊取,被害人沒有
[Abstract]:On June 23, 2014, the Supreme people's Court stated in a case of theft and fraud such as Zang Jinquan, the 27 guidance case issued by the Supreme people's Court: "the perpetrator made use of the information network," Whoever deceives others to click on a false link and actually steals property through a pre-implanted computer program constitutes a crime and shall be convicted and punished with the crime of larceny; Anyone who makes up a commodity or service that can be traded and deceives another person by clicking on a payment link and deceives property constitutes a crime and shall be convicted and punished by the crime of fraud. " The Supreme people's Court distinguishes between larceny and fraud from two aspects: main means and punishment consciousness. The main means of theft is secret theft, the victim did not
【作者單位】： 清華大學法學院;
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前2條

1 吳東穎;電信網(wǎng)絡(luò)詐騙案件中詐騙與盜竊的區(qū)分[D];廣西大學;2017年

2 張雪嬌;詐騙罪與民事欺詐的界限[D];鄭州大學;2017年

，

本文編號：2413564