【摘要】：本文對(duì)我國(guó)刑法罰金刑的基本理論及實(shí)踐中存在的各種相關(guān)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了初步的分析和探討。 引言部分探討了罰金刑的基本理論，對(duì)比分析了罰金刑的優(yōu)點(diǎn)、缺點(diǎn)。提出了罰金刑是懲治經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪的有效方法，是懲罰單位犯罪的最佳手段等九大優(yōu)點(diǎn)，同時(shí)指出了罰金刑的缺點(diǎn)，諸如罰金刑具有不平等性，罰金刑可能有悖于罪責(zé)自負(fù)、罰金刑相適應(yīng)原則，罰金刑有可能導(dǎo)致人們產(chǎn)生刑法商業(yè)化觀念等。 第一部分對(duì)中外罰金刑進(jìn)行了對(duì)比分析，主要探討了世界各國(guó)對(duì)罰金刑的適用范圍、使用方式、數(shù)額確定等方面的方法模式，概括了我國(guó)刑法規(guī)定的罰金刑的適用范圍、適用方式及數(shù)額確定原則。同時(shí)指出了罰金刑數(shù)額適用時(shí)應(yīng)注意的問(wèn)題，分析了犯罪情節(jié)范圍、犯罪人的經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況對(duì)確定罰金數(shù)額的影響等。 第二部分探討了罰金刑的數(shù)罪并罰問(wèn)題，主要探討了罰金刑與剝奪政治權(quán)利、沒(méi)收財(cái)產(chǎn)的并罰及兩個(gè)以上罰金刑的并罰，對(duì)罰金刑與其它附加刑的并罰的各種觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了評(píng)析。并提出，罰金刑與剝奪政治權(quán)利在內(nèi)容和執(zhí)行方式上沒(méi)有任何交叉、重復(fù)，也互不妨礙，可采取并科原則實(shí)行并罰。罰金刑與沒(méi)收財(cái)產(chǎn)刑屬于兩中性質(zhì)完全不同的刑罰，輕重程度、執(zhí)行方式、法律后果等都有不少差異，在目前刑罰制度下，采取并科原則較為適宜，但也應(yīng)該考慮實(shí)際執(zhí)行的可能。 第三部分探討了罰金刑在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中存在的主要問(wèn)題，并進(jìn)行了原因分析，在此基礎(chǔ)上，提出了完善我國(guó)罰金刑制度的幾點(diǎn)建議。這些意見(jiàn)包括：在罰金刑的地位方面，罰金刑應(yīng)當(dāng)躋身于主刑的行列；在適用范圍方面，對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪、貪利性犯罪、某些輕微故意犯罪、過(guò)失犯罪廣泛適用罰金刑，對(duì)公私財(cái)物對(duì)象的犯罪附加適用罰金刑；提出了罰金數(shù)額的規(guī)定方法和確定原則，，以及完善罰金刑的執(zhí)行措施等。
[Abstract]:This article has carried on the preliminary analysis and the discussion to our country criminal law fine penalty basic theory and the practice each kind of related question. The introduction discusses the basic theory of fine, and analyzes its advantages and disadvantages. This paper puts forward that fine penalty is an effective method to punish economic crime, is the best means of punishing unit crime, and points out the disadvantages of fine penalty, such as the inequality of fine penalty, the possibility of fine penalty being contrary to guilt and responsibility. Fine penalty adapts to the principle, and it may lead to the concept of commercialization of criminal law and so on. The first part has carried on the contrast analysis to the Chinese and foreign fine penalty, mainly has discussed the application scope, the use way, the amount determination and so on method pattern of the fine penalty in the world, has summarized the applicable scope of the fine penalty stipulated in the criminal law of our country. The method of application and the principle of determining the amount. At the same time, the paper points out the problems that should be paid attention to when the amount of fine is applied, analyzes the scope of the crime, the influence of the economic condition of the offender on the determination of the amount of fine, etc. The second part discusses the problem of the combination of several crimes of fine penalty, mainly discusses the fine penalty and deprivation of political rights, confiscation of property and two or more fine punishment of the parallel punishment, the fine and other additional punishment of the various views of the commentary. It is pointed out that the fine penalty and the deprivation of political rights have no overlap in content and execution, nor do they hinder each other, so the principle of combining punishment with science can be adopted. The penalty of fine and the penalty of confiscation of property belong to two kinds of penalty which are completely different in nature, such as the degree of severity, the way of execution, the legal consequence, etc. Under the present penalty system, it is more appropriate to adopt the principle of co-discipline. However, the possibility of practical implementation should also be considered. The third part discusses the main problems of the fine penalty in the judicial practice of our country, and analyzes the reasons, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the fine penalty system in our country. These views include: in the status of the fine penalty, the fine penalty should be in the ranks of the main punishment; In terms of scope of application, fines are widely applied to economic crimes, corruption crimes, some minor and intentional crimes, negligent crimes, and additional fines to the crimes of public and private property objects. This paper puts forward the stipulation method and principle of fine amount, and consummates the execution measure of fine penalty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2006
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 鞠茂亮,錢欣紅;用相對(duì)數(shù)確定財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪數(shù)額標(biāo)準(zhǔn)構(gòu)想[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年06期

本文編號(hào)：2403103