天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁(yè) > 法律論文 > 刑法論文 >

擾亂法庭秩序罪的行為研究

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-12-19 15:41
【摘要】:縱觀世界法律發(fā)展史,對(duì)于擾亂法庭秩序和損害司法權(quán)威的行為,無(wú)論是英美法系還是大陸法系,都予以了法律制裁。《刑法修正案(九)》對(duì)擾亂法庭秩序罪進(jìn)行了重大修改,擴(kuò)容了擾亂法庭秩序罪的行為,很好的回應(yīng)了司法需求,但同時(shí)也引發(fā)了極大的爭(zhēng)議。有學(xué)者認(rèn)為修改后增加的侮辱、誹謗、威脅訴訟參與人的行為與侮辱、誹謗罪、尋釁滋事罪在行為方式上存在競(jìng)合關(guān)系,可以通過(guò)侮辱罪、誹謗罪和尋釁滋事罪來(lái)規(guī)制不合理的擾亂法庭秩序行為,無(wú)須增加擾亂法庭秩序罪的入罪行為。律師界則有觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為增加犯罪行為容易導(dǎo)致該罪被濫用,從而會(huì)限制律師辯護(hù)權(quán),甚至不敢辯護(hù)。筆者認(rèn)為引發(fā)爭(zhēng)議的主要原因是擾亂法庭秩序罪客觀行為的界定不清晰,因此,筆者從擾亂法庭秩序罪的修改背景出發(fā),結(jié)合犯罪行為的罪狀描述,對(duì)擾亂法庭秩序罪的行為進(jìn)行研究。首先是引言部分,主要闡述擾亂法庭秩序罪的修改背景、修改內(nèi)容及各方觀點(diǎn)。其次對(duì)擾亂法庭秩序行為的限制性條件進(jìn)行分析,對(duì)行為的時(shí)間條件和場(chǎng)所條件作詳細(xì)說(shuō)明。最后是對(duì)擾亂法庭秩序罪的行為進(jìn)行逐一解析,通過(guò)比照刑法總則的規(guī)定和分則中相似的犯罪,結(jié)合擾亂法庭秩序罪罪狀描述,嘗試界定各個(gè)行為的含義,對(duì)行為的爭(zhēng)議進(jìn)行分析并闡明自己的觀點(diǎn),希望可以為司法實(shí)務(wù)中擾亂法庭秩序罪的適用提供參考。
[Abstract]:Throughout the history of world law, whether it is common law system or civil law system, the behavior that disturbs the court order and damages the judicial authority is not only a common law system, but also a civil law system. The amendment of the Criminal Law (9) made a major amendment to the crime of disturbing the order of the court, expanded the behavior of the crime of disturbing the order of the court, and responded well to the demand of the judiciary, but at the same time caused great controversy. Some scholars believe that there is a competing relationship between the behavior of the insult, libel, threat to the litigant participants and insults, libel, and the crime of provoking trouble after the amendment, which can be carried out through the crime of insult. The crime of libel and provocation is used to regulate the unreasonable behavior of disturbing the order of the court without the need to increase the incrimination of the crime of disturbing the order of the court. Lawyers argue that an increase in crime can lead to abuse of the crime, which limits lawyers' right to defence and even does not dare to defend. The author believes that the main reason for the controversy is that the definition of the objective behavior of the crime of disturbing the order of the court is not clear. Therefore, the author starts from the background of the modification of the crime of disturbing the order of the court, and combines the description of the crime with the crime of disturbing the order of the court. Conduct a study of a crime against the order of a court. The first part is the introduction, which mainly expounds the background, the content and the viewpoints of the crime of disturbing the order of the court. Secondly, the restrictive conditions of disturbing the court order are analyzed, and the time and place conditions of the behavior are explained in detail. Finally, it analyzes the crime of disturbing the order of the court one by one, and tries to define the meaning of each act by referring to the similar crimes in the general provisions and sub-provisions of the criminal law, and combining the description of the charges of the crime of disturbing the order of the court. This paper analyzes the controversy of behavior and clarifies its own viewpoint, hoping to provide reference for the application of the crime of disturbing the court order in judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬濤;劉義;;論擾亂法庭秩序罪的“擴(kuò)容性”立法——評(píng)《刑法修正案(九)》(草案)相關(guān)修改的正當(dāng)性[J];汕頭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年01期

2 陳興良;;擾亂法庭秩序罪的修訂:以律師為視角的評(píng)判[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2016年01期

3 劉進(jìn);;論擾亂法庭秩序行為犯罪化的制度構(gòu)建[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年12期

4 韓旭;;《刑法修正案(九)》實(shí)施后如何善待律師權(quán)利——兼論泄露案件信息罪和擾亂法庭秩序罪的理解與適用[J];法治研究;2015年06期

5 葉良芳;;擾亂法庭秩序罪的立法擴(kuò)張和司法應(yīng)對(duì)——以《中華人民共和國(guó)刑法修正案(九)》第37條為評(píng)析對(duì)象[J];理論探索;2015年06期

6 謝望原;;擾亂法庭秩序罪的正確理解與適用[J];人民檢察;2015年18期

7 曲f霞;袁江華;仇兆敏;;論藐視法庭罪之創(chuàng)設(shè)[J];法律適用;2015年06期

8 趙秉志;商浩文;;論妨害司法罪的立法完善——以《刑法修正案(九)(草案)》的相關(guān)修法為主要視角[J];法律適用;2015年01期

9 曹春燕;賈御博;;藐視法庭行為的處罰原則的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年27期

10 陳華;;論當(dāng)庭藐視法庭行為的法律規(guī)制[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2010年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張英霞;妨害司法權(quán)威典型犯罪研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 溫海濱;論法庭秩序[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

2 何冰洋;論誹謗罪中的誹謗行為[D];湘潭大學(xué);2013年

3 李遙;論我國(guó)侮辱罪中的侮辱行為[D];湘潭大學(xué);2012年

4 張雪蓮;藐視法庭行為研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

5 李鋒;論擾亂法庭秩序罪的現(xiàn)狀及完善[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

6 朱宏偉;論刑法中的威脅行為[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

,

本文編號(hào):2387120

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2387120.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶afef1***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com