擾亂法庭秩序罪的行為研究
[Abstract]:Throughout the history of world law, whether it is common law system or civil law system, the behavior that disturbs the court order and damages the judicial authority is not only a common law system, but also a civil law system. The amendment of the Criminal Law (9) made a major amendment to the crime of disturbing the order of the court, expanded the behavior of the crime of disturbing the order of the court, and responded well to the demand of the judiciary, but at the same time caused great controversy. Some scholars believe that there is a competing relationship between the behavior of the insult, libel, threat to the litigant participants and insults, libel, and the crime of provoking trouble after the amendment, which can be carried out through the crime of insult. The crime of libel and provocation is used to regulate the unreasonable behavior of disturbing the order of the court without the need to increase the incrimination of the crime of disturbing the order of the court. Lawyers argue that an increase in crime can lead to abuse of the crime, which limits lawyers' right to defence and even does not dare to defend. The author believes that the main reason for the controversy is that the definition of the objective behavior of the crime of disturbing the order of the court is not clear. Therefore, the author starts from the background of the modification of the crime of disturbing the order of the court, and combines the description of the crime with the crime of disturbing the order of the court. Conduct a study of a crime against the order of a court. The first part is the introduction, which mainly expounds the background, the content and the viewpoints of the crime of disturbing the order of the court. Secondly, the restrictive conditions of disturbing the court order are analyzed, and the time and place conditions of the behavior are explained in detail. Finally, it analyzes the crime of disturbing the order of the court one by one, and tries to define the meaning of each act by referring to the similar crimes in the general provisions and sub-provisions of the criminal law, and combining the description of the charges of the crime of disturbing the order of the court. This paper analyzes the controversy of behavior and clarifies its own viewpoint, hoping to provide reference for the application of the crime of disturbing the court order in judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D924.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 馬濤;劉義;;論擾亂法庭秩序罪的“擴(kuò)容性”立法——評(píng)《刑法修正案(九)》(草案)相關(guān)修改的正當(dāng)性[J];汕頭大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年01期
2 陳興良;;擾亂法庭秩序罪的修訂:以律師為視角的評(píng)判[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2016年01期
3 劉進(jìn);;論擾亂法庭秩序行為犯罪化的制度構(gòu)建[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年12期
4 韓旭;;《刑法修正案(九)》實(shí)施后如何善待律師權(quán)利——兼論泄露案件信息罪和擾亂法庭秩序罪的理解與適用[J];法治研究;2015年06期
5 葉良芳;;擾亂法庭秩序罪的立法擴(kuò)張和司法應(yīng)對(duì)——以《中華人民共和國(guó)刑法修正案(九)》第37條為評(píng)析對(duì)象[J];理論探索;2015年06期
6 謝望原;;擾亂法庭秩序罪的正確理解與適用[J];人民檢察;2015年18期
7 曲f霞;袁江華;仇兆敏;;論藐視法庭罪之創(chuàng)設(shè)[J];法律適用;2015年06期
8 趙秉志;商浩文;;論妨害司法罪的立法完善——以《刑法修正案(九)(草案)》的相關(guān)修法為主要視角[J];法律適用;2015年01期
9 曹春燕;賈御博;;藐視法庭行為的處罰原則的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年27期
10 陳華;;論當(dāng)庭藐視法庭行為的法律規(guī)制[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2010年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張英霞;妨害司法權(quán)威典型犯罪研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 溫海濱;論法庭秩序[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年
2 何冰洋;論誹謗罪中的誹謗行為[D];湘潭大學(xué);2013年
3 李遙;論我國(guó)侮辱罪中的侮辱行為[D];湘潭大學(xué);2012年
4 張雪蓮;藐視法庭行為研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年
5 李鋒;論擾亂法庭秩序罪的現(xiàn)狀及完善[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年
6 朱宏偉;論刑法中的威脅行為[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年
,本文編號(hào):2387120
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2387120.html