【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言是指:沒有相應(yīng)事實根據(jù)而被故意捏造出來,通過網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒介進(jìn)行散布和傳播并為相應(yīng)公眾所知曉的言論。網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言隨處可見,其危害也顯而易見,并隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)的普及而逐漸擴大。網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言不僅對自然人、法人等私權(quán)主體危害巨大,對正常的社會、經(jīng)濟秩序也造成了不小的影響,甚至還會影響到民族的團(tuán)結(jié)與國家的穩(wěn)定。然而,刑法在規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的過程中存在諸多缺陷,致使其不足以遏制網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言蔓延之趨勢。因此在明確網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言內(nèi)涵之基礎(chǔ)上,提出合法合理之建議以求得根治網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言之成效。本文約兩萬多字,分為五個部分:第一部分為網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的概述。在這個部分中厘清了網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的基本概念,界定了網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的幾點基本特征,分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言形成的原因及主要危害。從而對網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言有了一個基本的了解,并明確了刑法規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的重要意義。第二部分為刑法規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的現(xiàn)狀與分類。闡述了網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言與刑法之間的關(guān)系,明確了網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的相關(guān)行為并不當(dāng)然構(gòu)成刑事犯罪并且網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言僅僅是承載各類犯罪的一種方式。進(jìn)而了解到我國刑法規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言類型犯罪的現(xiàn)狀。根據(jù)我國的刑法體系對網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言類型的犯罪進(jìn)行了合理的分類。第三部分至第五部分是本文的核心內(nèi)容。根據(jù)現(xiàn)行刑事法律,分析其在規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言犯罪過程中所存在的種種問題,并對相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行歸納與分析。列舉了國外相關(guān)國家在刑法規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言過程中的寶貴經(jīng)驗。通過對問題的分析與探討,以及對經(jīng)驗的借鑒與吸收,提出相應(yīng)的對策與措施以解決刑法規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言過程中的問題�？傊�,只有明確刑法規(guī)制網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言界限的基礎(chǔ)之上才能更好地起到相應(yīng)的效果,以防止和杜絕網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言產(chǎn)生。
[Abstract]:Internet rumor refers to the speech which is deliberately fabricated without corresponding facts and disseminated through the network media and known to the corresponding public. Internet rumors can be seen everywhere, its harm is obvious, and with the popularity of the network and gradually expand. Internet rumors not only do great harm to the private right subjects such as natural persons and legal persons, but also have a great impact on the normal social and economic order, and even affect the unity of the nation and the stability of the country. However, the criminal law has many defects in the process of regulating network rumors, which makes it insufficient to curb the spreading trend of network rumors. Therefore, on the basis of defining the connotation of network rumor, the author puts forward legal and reasonable suggestions to achieve the effect of radical cure of network rumor. This paper, about 20,000 words, is divided into five parts: the first part is an overview of Internet rumors. In this part, the author clarifies the basic concept of the network rumor, defines several basic characteristics of the network rumor, and analyzes the reason and the main harm of the formation of the network rumor. So we have a basic understanding of the network rumors and the significance of the criminal law to regulate the network rumors. The second part is the current situation and classification of criminal law regulating network rumors. This paper expounds the relationship between network rumor and criminal law, and clarifies that the related behavior of network rumor does not constitute a criminal crime of course and that network rumor is only a way to carry all kinds of crimes. Then we know the current situation of the criminal law of our country to regulate the crime of network rumor type. According to the criminal law system of our country, the crime of network rumor type is classified reasonably. The third part to the fifth part is the core content of this paper. According to the current criminal law, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the process of regulating the crime of network rumor, and sums up and analyzes the related problems. This paper enumerates the valuable experience of foreign countries in the criminal law regulation of online rumors. Through the analysis and discussion of the problems, as well as the reference and absorption of the experience, the corresponding countermeasures and measures are put forward to solve the problems in the course of regulating the network rumors in the criminal law. In a word, only on the basis of defining the limits of criminal law to regulate the network rumor can it play a better effect in order to prevent and put an end to the emergence of the network rumor.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 徐衛(wèi)東;西原春夫;關(guān)哲夫;李潔;賈宇;梅傳強;李永升;徐岱;馮衛(wèi)國;童德華;陳忠林;張旭;李韌夫;華偉;閔春雷;李邦友;高珊琦;陳玉范;夏勇;王充;;刑法謙抑在中國——四校刑法學(xué)高層論壇[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年01期

2 王良順;尋釁滋事罪廢止論[J];法商研究;2005年04期

3 應(yīng)方冰;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言入罪的設(shè)想[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬);2012年08期

4 陶短房;;歐美如何應(yīng)對網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言?[J];世界博覽;2013年17期

5 孟鴻;李玉華;;我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言防治對策探討[J];理論探索;2012年04期

6 何雨;陳麗君;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的形成機制及其治理對策[J];南京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年03期

7 謝永江;黃方;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的法律規(guī)制[J];國家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年01期

8 溫春玲;冉巨火;周清水;張東舟;丁珊;劉哲;;沒有硝煙的戰(zhàn)場——打擊網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言[J];中國檢察官;2012年08期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王銳園;網(wǎng)絡(luò)謠言的刑法分析及其立法完善[D];中國政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2381700