論合同詐騙罪的司法適用
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-21 08:37
【摘要】：利用合同進行詐騙具有一定的特殊性，因此刑法將其進行單獨的設(shè)立。其設(shè)立之初是為了在保護當事人的財產(chǎn)權(quán)利的同時，更好的維護合同管理秩序或市場經(jīng)濟秩序。但是，隨著市場經(jīng)濟的不斷發(fā)展，合同的使用量逐漸提高，并且市場中利用合同進行欺詐的手段也變得多樣化。因此，如果過于寬泛地適用合同詐騙罪，必然導致一些本不應由刑法調(diào)整的行為被納入到刑法的調(diào)整范圍之內(nèi)，從而阻礙了市場經(jīng)濟領(lǐng)域自身的調(diào)節(jié)作用。同時，行為人所實施的合同詐騙罪的客觀行為與合同欺詐的客觀行為都是隱瞞、虛構(gòu)事實，因此兩者具有很強的相似性，以往學者僅僅從“非法占有目的”的主觀意圖進行兩者區(qū)分，有可能導致認定的不準確。 由此，對于合同詐騙罪這類經(jīng)濟領(lǐng)域中的犯罪應當限制其適用。從規(guī)范學的角度、刑法謙抑性的要求、刑事政策以及被害人解釋學的原理出發(fā)進行討論。基于上述理論的考量，筆者認為，首先從合同詐騙罪具體認定的問題出發(fā)，限制合同范圍、形式的認定及“非法占有目的”的認定，，同時限制對投機行為的刑法適用；其次，鑒于合同詐騙罪與合同欺詐難以區(qū)分，因此，可以通過程序上的設(shè)置實現(xiàn)對合同詐騙罪的限縮適用。通過實體與程序兩方面達到合同詐騙罪限縮適用的目的。
[Abstract]:Because of the particularity of using the contract to defraud, the criminal law establishes it separately. At the beginning of its establishment, it is to protect the property rights of the parties, at the same time, to better maintain the order of contract management or market economy. However, with the development of market economy, the use of contracts is gradually increasing, and the means of using contracts to cheat in the market become diversified. Therefore, if the crime of contract fraud is applied too broadly, it will inevitably lead to some behaviors which should not be adjusted by the criminal law, thus hindering the adjustment function of the market economy field itself. At the same time, the objective behavior of the crime of contract fraud and the objective behavior of contract fraud are both concealed and fictitious, so they have strong similarities. In the past, scholars only made a distinction from the subjective intention of "illegal possession purpose", which may lead to inaccurate identification. Therefore, the application of contract fraud in economic field should be restricted. From the standardism point of view, the requirements of modesty of criminal law, criminal policy and the principle of victim hermeneutics are discussed. Based on the above theoretical considerations, the author thinks that, first of all, starting from the specific identification of the crime of contract fraud, it limits the scope of the contract, the confirmation of the form and the recognition of the "purpose of illegal possession", and at the same time limits the application of criminal law to speculation; Secondly, since the crime of contract fraud and contract fraud are difficult to distinguish, we can realize the limitation and application of contract fraud crime by setting up procedures. The purpose of contract fraud is to limit the application of contract fraud through entity and procedure.
【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
本文編號：2346452
[Abstract]:Because of the particularity of using the contract to defraud, the criminal law establishes it separately. At the beginning of its establishment, it is to protect the property rights of the parties, at the same time, to better maintain the order of contract management or market economy. However, with the development of market economy, the use of contracts is gradually increasing, and the means of using contracts to cheat in the market become diversified. Therefore, if the crime of contract fraud is applied too broadly, it will inevitably lead to some behaviors which should not be adjusted by the criminal law, thus hindering the adjustment function of the market economy field itself. At the same time, the objective behavior of the crime of contract fraud and the objective behavior of contract fraud are both concealed and fictitious, so they have strong similarities. In the past, scholars only made a distinction from the subjective intention of "illegal possession purpose", which may lead to inaccurate identification. Therefore, the application of contract fraud in economic field should be restricted. From the standardism point of view, the requirements of modesty of criminal law, criminal policy and the principle of victim hermeneutics are discussed. Based on the above theoretical considerations, the author thinks that, first of all, starting from the specific identification of the crime of contract fraud, it limits the scope of the contract, the confirmation of the form and the recognition of the "purpose of illegal possession", and at the same time limits the application of criminal law to speculation; Secondly, since the crime of contract fraud and contract fraud are difficult to distinguish, we can realize the limitation and application of contract fraud crime by setting up procedures. The purpose of contract fraud is to limit the application of contract fraud through entity and procedure.
【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 焦寶乾;;法教義學的觀念及其演變[J];法商研究;2006年04期
2 廣東省廣州市越秀區(qū)人民檢察院課題組;林歡平;文勇;;合同詐騙罪的司法實務(wù)研究[J];法學雜志;2009年10期
3 繆春華;陸明明;;芻議刑事推定的負面屬性及救濟[J];法制與社會;2010年21期
4 劉晶晶;;當前我國經(jīng)濟犯罪案件適用刑事和解問題研究[J];中國人民公安大學學報(社會科學版);2013年01期
5 鄭麗萍;;新刑訴法視域下的刑事和解制度研究[J];比較法研究;2013年02期
6 喻貴英;《合同法》與合同詐騙罪之“合同”[J];河北法學;2004年06期
7 徐興俊;;合同詐騙罪中的“合同”認定探析[J];湖南財經(jīng)高等專科學校學報;2006年01期
8 陳興良;;形式與實質(zhì)的關(guān)系:刑法學的反思性檢討[J];法學研究;2008年06期
9 梁曉旭;合同詐騙罪與民事欺詐行為之比較[J];理論探索;2004年03期
10 李衛(wèi)紅,王廣興;論利用經(jīng)濟合同詐騙與經(jīng)濟合同糾紛的界限[J];中外法學;1994年02期
本文編號：2346452
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2346452.html
