【摘要】：隨著高校畢業(yè)生“就業(yè)難”問題的日益突出,公務(wù)員考試的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)也越來(lái)越激烈,供過(guò)于求的現(xiàn)狀和公務(wù)員的高福利待遇使得在招收公務(wù)員過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)了大量的徇私舞弊的行為。招收公務(wù)員、學(xué)生徇私舞弊行為具有嚴(yán)重的社會(huì)危害性。因此,《中華人民共和國(guó)刑法》在刑法分則第九章瀆職罪中設(shè)置第418條規(guī)制招收公務(wù)員、學(xué)生徇私舞弊行為,即國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)工作人員在招收公務(wù)員、學(xué)生工作中徇私舞弊,情節(jié)嚴(yán)重的,處三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役。2005年12月29日通過(guò)的《最高人民檢察院關(guān)于瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪案件立案標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的規(guī)定》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱《規(guī)定》)在第34條規(guī)定了本罪的立案標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。近年來(lái),最高人民檢察院發(fā)文要嚴(yán)查招收公務(wù)員徇私舞弊等八類瀆職侵權(quán)犯罪。但是,在刑法學(xué)界和司法實(shí)務(wù)界,對(duì)本罪的研究較少,在司法實(shí)踐中,一系列與招收公務(wù)員、學(xué)生徇私舞弊行為類似的新情況的出現(xiàn),給司法實(shí)務(wù)人員在司法認(rèn)定中帶來(lái)了困惑,因此,為了更好的懲治本罪,本文將對(duì)此罪的立法狀況展開研究。 本文分為三章,具體如下： 本文第一章是“國(guó)內(nèi)外招收公務(wù)員、學(xué)生徇私舞弊罪的立法現(xiàn)狀”,在本章中,筆者意圖通過(guò)比較法的角度對(duì)本罪的國(guó)內(nèi)外立法例展開研究。首先,筆者對(duì)我國(guó)招收公務(wù)員、學(xué)生徇私舞弊罪的立法現(xiàn)狀展開評(píng)析,同時(shí)歸納出目前本罪的犯罪構(gòu)成要件的內(nèi)容,以及我國(guó)關(guān)于本罪的立法特點(diǎn)。其次,筆者對(duì)國(guó)外相關(guān)國(guó)家和地區(qū)關(guān)于本罪的立法現(xiàn)狀展開評(píng)析,總結(jié)出國(guó)外立法例關(guān)于本罪的立法特點(diǎn)。 本文第二章是“我國(guó)招收公務(wù)員、學(xué)生徇私舞弊罪的立法評(píng)析”,在本章中,筆者通過(guò)對(duì)本罪的立法缺陷展開細(xì)致深入的探討,主要是從以下幾個(gè)方面：本罪的行為對(duì)象、本罪的時(shí)空范圍、本罪的立案標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、本罪罪數(shù)、本罪的法定刑以及本罪與相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的銜接等方面展開。 本文第三章是“我國(guó)招收公務(wù)員、學(xué)生徇私舞弊罪的立法完善”,在本章中,筆者通過(guò)上文的論述,展開對(duì)我國(guó)招收公務(wù)員、學(xué)生徇私舞弊罪的立法完善的思考和建議。首先,筆者闡述對(duì)本罪進(jìn)行立法完善應(yīng)該遵循的原則,然后,筆者從多方面具體闡述完善本罪的立法思考和建議。
[Abstract]:With the increasingly prominent problem of "difficult employment" for college graduates, the competition for civil servants' examinations is becoming more and more fierce. The oversupply and the high welfare treatment of civil servants make a large number of malpractices for favoritism in the process of recruiting civil servants. Recruitment of civil servants, students favoritism fraud has serious social harm. Therefore, the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China establishes Article 418 in Chapter 9 of the Criminal Law Sub-Clause of Criminal Law to regulate the admission of civil servants, students engaging in malpractices for personal gain, that is, the recruitment of civil servants by State officials, and malpractices by students in their work, If the circumstances are serious, "the provisions of the Supreme people's Procuratorate on filing Standards for cases of malfeasance and infringement" (hereinafter referred to as "provisions"), adopted on December 29, 2005, set forth the standard for filing this crime in Article 34. In recent years, the Supreme people's Procuratorate has issued papers to investigate eight types of crimes of malfeasance, such as malpractice for favoritism and malpractice. However, in the field of criminal law and judicial practice, there are few researches on this crime. In judicial practice, a series of new situations similar to the recruitment of civil servants and students' practice of favoritism and malpractice appear. So, in order to punish this crime better, this article will carry on the research to the legislation condition of this crime. This article is divided into three chapters: the first chapter of this article is "the domestic and foreign civil servants, students favoritism fraud crime legislation status quo", in this chapter, the author intends to study the domestic and foreign legislation of this crime through the perspective of comparative law. First of all, the author evaluates the current legislative situation of recruiting civil servants and students for favoritism and fraud, and sums up the content of the elements of the crime, as well as the legislative characteristics of this crime in our country. Secondly, the author analyzes the current legislative situation of foreign countries and regions on this crime, summarizes the legislative characteristics of foreign legislation cases on this crime. The second chapter of this article is "our country enroll the civil servant, the student favoritism fraud crime legislation appraisal", in this chapter, the author through to this crime legislation flaw launches the detailed thorough discussion, is mainly from the following several aspects: this crime behavior object, The scope of time and space of the crime, the standard of filing the crime, the number of the crime, the legal penalty of the crime and the connection between the crime and the relevant laws and regulations. The third chapter of this article is "our country enroll the civil servant, the student favoritism fraud crime legislation consummation", in this chapter, the author through the above discussion, launches to our country enrol the civil servant, the student favoritism fraud crime legislation consummation ponder and the suggestion. First of all, the author expounds the principles that should be followed in the legislative perfection of this crime, and then, the author expounds the legislative thinking and suggestions from various aspects to perfect the crime.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.393

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張曦;李益明;;司法規(guī)律與檢查權(quán)配置的協(xié)調(diào)性[J];重慶行政;2008年04期

2 陳玉范;試論招收公務(wù)員、學(xué)生徇私舞弊罪[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年12期

3 張明楷;論刑法的謙抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1995年04期

4 蘇彩霞;;刑法價(jià)值判斷的實(shí)體性論證規(guī)則[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

5 邱賽蘭;徇私舞弊型瀆職犯罪的罪數(shù)認(rèn)定[J];湖南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

6 孫仁丕;;招收學(xué)生徇私舞弊罪的幾個(gè)問題探討[J];荊楚理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年12期

7 馮亞東;受賄罪與瀆職罪競(jìng)合問題[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年01期

8 黎宏;;論瀆職罪中的兩個(gè)問題[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年11期

9 張明楷;;瀆職罪中“徇私”、“舞弊”的性質(zhì)與認(rèn)定[J];人民檢察;2005年23期

10 肖中華;瀆職罪認(rèn)定中的幾個(gè)共性問題探析[J];法學(xué)論壇;2001年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 孟凡君;中國(guó)犯罪定量規(guī)定模式的反思與重構(gòu)[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2318013