【摘要】：在高壓反腐的政治背景下,正確理解和適用我國(guó)《刑法》第383條第3款,事關(guān)貪污犯罪人從寬處罰的刑事正義的科學(xué)實(shí)現(xiàn)。單獨(dú)設(shè)置貪污罪的從寬規(guī)定,產(chǎn)生了適用上的困惑和理解上的爭(zhēng)議,不利于有效懲治貪污犯罪。因此,有必要對(duì)該條文作進(jìn)一步地探討和研究。從建國(guó)至今,貪污罪從寬的條款經(jīng)歷了7 0多年的發(fā)展,《刑法修正案(九)》對(duì)貪污罪從寬的規(guī)定就是最新的立法增加。通過分析比較可知,貪污罪從寬處罰條款與《刑法》第36、37條中賠償經(jīng)濟(jì)損失的規(guī)定是協(xié)調(diào)一致的,保持了立法的協(xié)調(diào)性。其中,貪污罪從寬條款設(shè)立是有理論根據(jù)的,如憲政的核心是保障犯罪人人權(quán)、寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事政策對(duì)犯罪人的懲罰保持寬嚴(yán)適當(dāng)?shù)牟呗?以及刑法謙抑性強(qiáng)調(diào)的寬和與謙遜等,都為貪污罪從寬條款的設(shè)立提供了理論支撐。雖然貪污罪從寬規(guī)定有其合理性,但違反了《刑法》第67條坦白的規(guī)定,是分則突破總則的表現(xiàn),而且該條款中的酌定情節(jié)法定化屬于“立法特權(quán)”,也違反了刑法的平等性原則。最后,針對(duì)“真誠(chéng)悔罪、積極退贓”的模糊性規(guī)定,應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)一步細(xì)化,提出了一些自己的理解,期望能達(dá)到更為明確的解釋效果。
[Abstract]:Under the political background of high-pressure anti-corruption, the correct understanding and application of the third paragraph of Article 383 of the Criminal Law of our country is related to the scientific realization of criminal justice of lenient punishment of the embezzler. Setting the lenient stipulation of corruption crime alone leads to confusion in application and controversy in understanding, which is not conducive to the effective punishment of corruption crime. Therefore, it is necessary to further explore and study this article. Since the founding of the people's Republic of China, the provisions of leniency of the crime of corruption have been developed for more than 70 years. The provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment (9) on leniency of the crime of corruption are the latest legislative increase. Through the analysis and comparison, it can be seen that the lenient punishment clause of corruption crime is in harmony with the provision of compensation for economic losses in Article 36 of the Criminal Law, and the coordination of legislation is maintained. Among them, the establishment of lenient clause of corruption crime is theoretically based, for example, the core of constitutionalism is to protect the human rights of the criminal, the policy of leniency and strictness of criminal policy to punish the offender, and the leniency and modesty emphasized by the criminal law, etc. Both of them provide theoretical support for the establishment of leniency clause of corruption crime. Although the lenient stipulation of the crime of corruption is reasonable, it violates the provisions of Article 67 of the Criminal Law and is the manifestation of breaking through the general provisions. Moreover, the legalization of the discretionary circumstances in this article belongs to the "legislative privilege". It also violates the principle of equality in criminal law. Finally, in view of the fuzziness stipulation of "sincere repentance, active return of spoils", it should be further refined, and put forward some own understanding, in the hope of achieving a more clear interpretation effect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張兆松;;論《刑法修正案(九)》對(duì)貪污賄賂犯罪的十大重大修改和完善[J];法治研究;2016年02期

2 盧建平;朱賀;;酌定量刑情節(jié)法定化的路徑選擇及評(píng)析——以我國(guó)《刑法》第383條第3款為例[J];政治與法律;2016年03期

3 葉良芳;;行賄受賄懲治模式的博弈分析與實(shí)踐檢驗(yàn)——兼評(píng)《刑法修正案(九)》第44條和第45條[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2016年01期

4 張旭;;也談《刑法修正案(九)》關(guān)于貪污賄賂犯罪的修改[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2016年01期

5 歐陽本祺;;論《刑法》第383條之修正[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2016年01期

6 陳偉;;《刑法修正案(九)》刑罰修訂內(nèi)容介評(píng)[J];法治研究;2015年06期

7 汪勇;;《刑法修正案(九)》對(duì)貪污罪的修訂及適用[J];中國(guó)審判;2015年20期

8 繆樹權(quán);;反貪污賄賂立法的一次重要修訂——《刑法修正案(九)》對(duì)貪污賄賂犯罪的修改和完善[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2015年19期

9 鄭旭江;;反腐新常態(tài)下貪污賄賂犯罪的立法完善[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期

10 梁根林;;貪污受賄定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的立法完善[J];中國(guó)法律評(píng)論;2015年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2294847