非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪問(wèn)題研究
[Abstract]:The core problem of economic system reform is to deal well with the relationship between government and market, to solve the problems of imperfect market system and excessive government intervention. The trend of unlimited expansion and application of the crime of illegal operation is one of the manifestations of the state's excessive intervention in the market economy, which violates the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime against a crime and the principle of modesty of the criminal law. In 1997, the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "Criminal Law") set up the crime of illegal operation, and adopted the legislative technique of combining blank crime with the underlying clause. However, with the development of market economy and the surge of market anomie, the legislative provisions of illegal operation crime can not be dealt with in a leisurely manner. Special Criminal Law, the introduction of a number of judicial interpretations, the expansion of the crime punishment of the type of behavior. However, the connotation and judicial determination of the crime did not become clear but increased the difficulty. We have to rethink the boundaries of illegal business crime and make it a top priority to prevent its unlimited expansion. The vague expression of the content of the illegal business crime, the extension of the underlying clause, the misunderstanding and abuse of the criminal provision in judicial practice are all the existing problems of the crime. Therefore, we should clarify the connotation and extension of the crime of illegal operation in legislation, scientifically and reasonably define the "state regulation", strictly limit the extension of the clause of shrinking bottom, and make clear the criterion of "serious circumstances"; From the judicial point of view, we should further clarify the applicable conditions of the crime of illegal operation, limit the expansion of the judicial interpretation of the crime of illegal operation, and strictly exercise the judicial discretion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D924.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 鄭偉;葛立剛;;刑行交叉視野下非法經(jīng)營(yíng)法律責(zé)任厘定[J];法律適用;2017年03期
2 馬寧;王t@;;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪的認(rèn)定和適用研究[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期
3 劉憲權(quán);;操縱證券、期貨市場(chǎng)罪“兜底條款”解釋規(guī)則的建構(gòu)與應(yīng)用 搶帽子交易刑法屬性辨正[J];中外法學(xué);2013年06期
4 馬春曉;;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪的“口袋化”困境和規(guī)范解釋路徑——基于司法實(shí)務(wù)的分析立場(chǎng)[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2013年06期
5 歐陽(yáng)本祺;;對(duì)非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪兜底性規(guī)定的實(shí)證分析[J];法學(xué);2012年07期
6 張建軍;;論空白罪狀的明確性[J];法學(xué);2012年05期
7 高翼飛;;從擴(kuò)張走向變異:非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪如何擺脫“口袋罪”的宿命[J];政治與法律;2012年03期
8 陳興良;;刑法的明確性問(wèn)題:以《刑法》第225條第4項(xiàng)為例的分析[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2011年04期
9 朱昌波;史丹如;;論非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪的現(xiàn)實(shí)沖突與完善[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期
10 丁華宇;;刑法中的兜底性條款探析[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 陳超然;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪適用范圍的擴(kuò)張及其限制研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2013年
2 楊慶堂;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪立法及司法適用研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年
3 范德安;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 何溢;非法經(jīng)營(yíng)罪適用擴(kuò)大化傾向及對(duì)策研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2016年
,本文編號(hào):2292732
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2292732.html