【摘要】：在當(dāng)今“自媒體”時(shí)代,關(guān)于社會(huì)影響因素對(duì)量刑的作用越來(lái)越明顯,但是其中也出現(xiàn)了不少問(wèn)題,其一,我國(guó)司法解釋雖然承認(rèn)了“惡劣社會(huì)影響”介入了量刑情節(jié)的合法性,但是從立法的視角來(lái)看,關(guān)于社會(huì)影響因素的法律定位卻沒(méi)有細(xì)致規(guī)定。其二,由于法律的缺失性規(guī)定導(dǎo)致法官可能在審判的過(guò)程中背離罪責(zé)刑相適應(yīng)原則,甚至可能這樣潛在地增加了法官的量刑自由裁量權(quán),從而導(dǎo)致可能對(duì)犯罪分子的量刑存在司法不公正的情況,甚至法官可能迫于社會(huì)影響力而選擇對(duì)犯罪分子處罰量刑適用頂格的刑罰。其三,盡管社會(huì)影響對(duì)量刑的作用是一把雙刃劍,但是由于司法建設(shè)的不完整、民眾理性的不健全以及理論的缺失,最終社會(huì)影響對(duì)量刑是弊大于利,而且會(huì)對(duì)司法實(shí)踐產(chǎn)生負(fù)面問(wèn)題;最后,筆者分別從立法、司法方面,多角度提出針對(duì)社會(huì)影響因素作用于量刑的思考,重點(diǎn)是一要從立法上完善社會(huì)影響因素的相關(guān)界定的法律概念以及從其他方面滿足公眾對(duì)司法的參與需求,二是從司法機(jī)關(guān)要規(guī)制自己的量刑自由裁量權(quán),不能隨意受社會(huì)影響的意見(jiàn)而放棄理性的法律觀來(lái)公正判案量刑。
[Abstract]:In today's "self-media" era, the role of social factors in sentencing is becoming more and more obvious, but there are also many problems. Although the judicial interpretation of our country has acknowledged the legality of "bad social influence" intervening in sentencing circumstances, but from the angle of legislation, there are no detailed regulations on the legal orientation of social influence factors. Second, due to the lack of legal provisions, judges may deviate from the principle of the adaptation of crime, responsibility and punishment in the course of trial, and may even potentially increase the discretion of the judge in sentencing. As a result, there may be judicial injustice in the sentencing of criminals, and even judges may choose to apply the top punishment to the punishment of criminals under the influence of society. Third, although the role of social influence on sentencing is a double-edged sword, due to the incomplete judicial construction, the imperfect public rationality and the lack of theory, the ultimate social impact on sentencing is more harmful than good. And it will produce negative problems to the judicial practice. Finally, the author puts forward some thoughts on the effect of social influence factors on sentencing from the aspects of legislation and judicature respectively. The focus is to improve the relevant legal concept of social impact factors in legislation and other aspects to meet the needs of the public to participate in the judiciary, the second is from the judicial organs to regulate their own discretion in sentencing, We should not give up the rational view of law in order to judge the case and sentence justice by the opinion of the society at will.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳景輝;;忠誠(chéng)于法律的職業(yè)倫理——破解法律人道德困境的基本方案[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2016年04期

2 商鳳廷;;瀆職罪中“造成惡劣社會(huì)影響”的司法認(rèn)定[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

3 孫笑俠;;“法治中國(guó)”的三個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2013年05期

4 胡銘;劉斌;;從公案看涉檢輿情應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制[J];浙江工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

5 孫銳;;司法裁判考量社會(huì)輿論的正當(dāng)性[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

6 周曉虹;;自媒體時(shí)代:從傳播到互播的轉(zhuǎn)變[J];新聞界;2011年04期

7 后宏偉;;對(duì)民憤作為酌定量刑情節(jié)的分析[J];雞西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

8 周永坤;;民意審判與審判元規(guī)則[J];法學(xué);2009年08期

9 后宏偉;;對(duì)一起中學(xué)生自殺案件的分析[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2008年05期

10 汪明亮;;媒體對(duì)定罪量刑活動(dòng)可能帶來(lái)負(fù)面影響的作用機(jī)制[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2006年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 吳吉星;;從立法本意出發(fā) 把握“惡劣社會(huì)影響”[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2017年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳煒;量刑情節(jié)研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 全金;論法官量刑自由裁量權(quán)的行使[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2287864