【摘要】：在大陸法系存在區(qū)分制和單一制兩種共犯制度。區(qū)分制在認(rèn)定共同犯罪刑事責(zé)任時,存在正犯和共犯難以界分、正犯內(nèi)涵不斷擴充的理論難題和刑事責(zé)任認(rèn)定過程缺乏層次性及原因和結(jié)果并列、前提和結(jié)論并存的邏輯困境。單一制在認(rèn)定共同犯罪刑事責(zé)任時有其優(yōu)勢,但也存在理論不足和實踐局限。本土現(xiàn)有共犯制度不能完全滿足認(rèn)定共同犯罪刑事責(zé)任的司法需求,應(yīng)當(dāng)構(gòu)建雙層結(jié)構(gòu)的共犯制度。
[Abstract]:There are two kinds of accomplice system in continental law system: distinguishing system and single system. In the identification of joint criminal liability, there is a logical dilemma that the principal offender and the accomplice are difficult to distinguish between, the theoretical problem of the expanding connotation of the principal offender and the lack of hierarchy, the reasons and the result of the criminal responsibility determination process, and the coexistence of the premise and the conclusion. The unitary system has its advantages in the determination of joint criminal responsibility, but it also has some limitations in theory and practice. The existing local accomplice system can not fully meet the judicial demand for the determination of joint criminal responsibility, and should build a two-tier structure of accomplice system.
【作者單位】： 昆明理工大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：昆明理工大學(xué)省級人文社會科學(xué)研究基金資助項目“共犯制度研究”(項目號:KKSY201324107)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D924.1
，

本文編號：2263665