【摘要】：在刑法理論界,關(guān)于類推解釋有三種觀點,分別為否定論、贊成論及第三種立場。第三種立場明確反對類推解釋,卻利用刑法解釋不斷在個罪規(guī)范上尋求突破,具體路徑一般從三個維度展開:用正義代替文義、比較點的改變及引入舉輕以明重。若要堅持刑法解釋的合理邊界,就需要回歸文義、正確選擇比較點及慎用舉重以明輕。詮釋規(guī)范文義應(yīng)從文義開始并止于文義,歷史解釋、體系解釋等方法是探尋文義的路徑,目的解釋是決定文義選擇的手段。解釋結(jié)果是否符合文義可從兩個維度進行考察:是否符合詞語的通俗用法,是否符合語言的邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:In the field of criminal law theory, there are three views on analogies, namely, negation and discussion of the third position. The third kind of stand is clear against analogy interpretation, but use criminal law interpretation to seek breakthrough in individual crime norm constantly, the concrete path generally starts from three dimensions: using justice to replace the meaning of literature, the change of comparison point and the introduction of light to light with light weight. If we want to insist on the reasonable boundary of criminal law interpretation, we need to return to the meaning of the text, choose the right point of comparison and use weight lifting carefully to lighten the light. The interpretation of normative meaning should begin with the meaning of the text and stop at the meaning of the text, historical interpretation, system interpretation and other methods are the way to explore the meaning of text, the purpose of interpretation is the means to decide the choice of the meaning of the text. Whether the interpretation results accord with the meaning of text can be examined from two dimensions: whether they accord with the popular usage of words and whether they conform to the logical structure of language.
【作者單位】： 上海政法學(xué)院刑事司法學(xué)院;
【基金】：上海市曙光計劃項目(16SG52) 上海政法學(xué)院項目(GH16042)
【分類號】：D924.1
，

本文編號：2232486