冒充警察搜身取財(cái)行為定性問題研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-01 13:29
【摘要】：為了維護(hù)國(guó)家機(jī)關(guān)的威信及其工作人員的形象，也為了保證國(guó)家機(jī)器的平穩(wěn)運(yùn)行，我國(guó)1979年刑法典規(guī)定了招搖撞騙罪，1997年修訂后的刑法典在之前的基礎(chǔ)上增加了“冒充警察招搖撞騙的從重處罰”的規(guī)定。但是，由于受限于立法技術(shù)，加之司法解釋的缺失，使檢察官和法官們難以把握情節(jié)對(duì)相關(guān)案件進(jìn)行準(zhǔn)確定性。學(xué)界對(duì)于招搖撞騙罪的爭(zhēng)議也一直在持續(xù)，沒有形成一個(gè)主流的、使多數(shù)人信服的觀點(diǎn)。 本文選取了筆者在沈陽市人民檢察院實(shí)習(xí)期間協(xié)助辦理的一起真實(shí)案例，在全面分析被告人行為、被害人心理狀態(tài)等方面的基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合現(xiàn)階段學(xué)界的研究成果，總結(jié)出了招搖撞騙罪在司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問題和解決方式。筆者著眼于本案的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)，認(rèn)為被告人暴力行為的認(rèn)定與否是招搖撞騙案件的疑難問題之一。在此類案件中，被告人做出的暴力行為通常是其冒充或者欺騙行為的組成部分，所以在暴力程度較低的情況下，不應(yīng)當(dāng)將其行為劃歸為暴力。同理于暴力的認(rèn)定，諸如此類案件中被告人的系列行為包含的類似于脅迫、威脅或者要挾行為也應(yīng)當(dāng)予以全面考察。招搖撞騙罪與詐騙罪的競(jìng)合問題也是司法實(shí)踐中的難點(diǎn)之一，，筆者在綜合各方觀點(diǎn)后，認(rèn)為二者屬于法條競(jìng)合中的交叉競(jìng)合，應(yīng)當(dāng)按照“擇一重罪處罰”的原則進(jìn)行處斷。 本案一審法院認(rèn)定二被告人構(gòu)成搶劫罪，并且屬于搶劫罪的加重情節(jié)——冒充軍警搶劫，判處二被告人有期徒刑十年，并處罰金。筆者認(rèn)為該判決適用法律錯(cuò)誤，從而導(dǎo)致判決有違我國(guó)刑法的罪責(zé)刑相適應(yīng)原則。這同時(shí)也是筆者撰寫論文的目的，期望通過對(duì)案例的全面分析，結(jié)合案情，對(duì)該案有一個(gè)相對(duì)合理和中肯的結(jié)論，以期能夠?qū)φ袚u撞騙罪的相關(guān)司法實(shí)踐有些許幫助，為促進(jìn)刑法保障人權(quán)和懲罰犯罪的結(jié)合奉獻(xiàn)綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:In order to maintain the prestige of state organs and the image of their staff, and also to ensure the smooth operation of the state machinery, The criminal code of our country in 1979 stipulated the crime of scamming and cheating, and the revised criminal code of 1997 added the stipulation of "the heavier punishment of impersonating police cheating" on the basis of the previous criminal code. However, due to the limitation of legislative techniques and the lack of judicial interpretation, it is difficult for prosecutors and judges to define the relevant cases accurately. The controversy about the crime of scamming and cheating has not formed a mainstream and convincing point of view. This paper selects a real case that the author assisted in the practice of Shenyang people's Procuratorate. On the basis of comprehensive analysis of the behavior of the defendant and the psychological state of the victim, combined with the current academic research results, Summed up the crime of deception in the judicial practice of the problems and solutions. Focusing on the focus of the dispute, the author thinks that the identification of the defendant's violent behavior is one of the difficult problems in the fraud case. In such cases, the acts of violence committed by the accused are usually part of their impersonation or deceit, so in the case of low level of violence, the acts should not be classified as violence. By the same token of violence, the series of actions of the accused in such cases should also be examined in a comprehensive way, similar to coercion, threats or threats. It is also one of the difficulties in judicial practice that the competition between the crime of scamming and cheating and the crime of fraud is one of the difficulties in judicial practice. After synthesizing the views of all parties, the author thinks that the two belong to the cross-competing of the competing articles of law, and should be decided according to the principle of "choosing a felony punishment". The court of first instance in this case found that the two defendants constituted the crime of robbery, and that the aggravated circumstance of the crime of robbery-impersonating military police robbery, sentenced the two defendants to fixed-term imprisonment of 10 years and a fine. The author thinks that the judgment is wrong in application of law, which results in the judgment being contrary to the principle of crime, responsibility and punishment of our country's criminal law. At the same time, it is the purpose of the author to write the thesis. I hope that through the comprehensive analysis of the case and the case, there will be a relatively reasonable and pertinent conclusion on the case, in the hope that it can be of some help to the relevant judicial practice of the crime of bluffing and cheating. To promote the criminal law to protect human rights and punish the combination of crime dedicated to a modest force.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3
本文編號(hào)：2217351
[Abstract]:In order to maintain the prestige of state organs and the image of their staff, and also to ensure the smooth operation of the state machinery, The criminal code of our country in 1979 stipulated the crime of scamming and cheating, and the revised criminal code of 1997 added the stipulation of "the heavier punishment of impersonating police cheating" on the basis of the previous criminal code. However, due to the limitation of legislative techniques and the lack of judicial interpretation, it is difficult for prosecutors and judges to define the relevant cases accurately. The controversy about the crime of scamming and cheating has not formed a mainstream and convincing point of view. This paper selects a real case that the author assisted in the practice of Shenyang people's Procuratorate. On the basis of comprehensive analysis of the behavior of the defendant and the psychological state of the victim, combined with the current academic research results, Summed up the crime of deception in the judicial practice of the problems and solutions. Focusing on the focus of the dispute, the author thinks that the identification of the defendant's violent behavior is one of the difficult problems in the fraud case. In such cases, the acts of violence committed by the accused are usually part of their impersonation or deceit, so in the case of low level of violence, the acts should not be classified as violence. By the same token of violence, the series of actions of the accused in such cases should also be examined in a comprehensive way, similar to coercion, threats or threats. It is also one of the difficulties in judicial practice that the competition between the crime of scamming and cheating and the crime of fraud is one of the difficulties in judicial practice. After synthesizing the views of all parties, the author thinks that the two belong to the cross-competing of the competing articles of law, and should be decided according to the principle of "choosing a felony punishment". The court of first instance in this case found that the two defendants constituted the crime of robbery, and that the aggravated circumstance of the crime of robbery-impersonating military police robbery, sentenced the two defendants to fixed-term imprisonment of 10 years and a fine. The author thinks that the judgment is wrong in application of law, which results in the judgment being contrary to the principle of crime, responsibility and punishment of our country's criminal law. At the same time, it is the purpose of the author to write the thesis. I hope that through the comprehensive analysis of the case and the case, there will be a relatively reasonable and pertinent conclusion on the case, in the hope that it can be of some help to the relevant judicial practice of the crime of bluffing and cheating. To promote the criminal law to protect human rights and punish the combination of crime dedicated to a modest force.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 肖露;;淺析招搖撞騙罪的客觀要件[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(科學(xué)教育版);2011年05期
2 韓光軍;楊新紅;;詐騙罪與招搖撞騙罪競(jìng)合關(guān)系之論證[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年04期
3 付立慶;;論軍警人員搶劫行為之法定刑適用[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年04期
4 劉艷紅;冒充軍警人員實(shí)施搶劫罪之法定刑設(shè)置疏漏[J];法學(xué);2000年06期
5 陳興良;;敲詐勒索罪與搶劫罪之界分——兼對(duì)“兩個(gè)當(dāng)場(chǎng)”觀點(diǎn)的質(zhì)疑[J];法學(xué);2011年02期
6 李磊;;冒充警察敲詐勒索與招搖撞騙之區(qū)別[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年35期
7 楊建軍;;如何界定敲詐勒索罪中要挾行為的內(nèi)容[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2010年06期
8 王樹茂;;“冒充軍警人員搶劫”相關(guān)問題辨析[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2010年19期
9 蒲英華;張賀全;;招搖撞騙罪與詐騙罪法條競(jìng)合時(shí)應(yīng)如何定罪處罰[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2011年12期
10 緱澤昆;;詐騙罪中被害人的懷疑與錯(cuò)誤——基于被害人解釋學(xué)的研究[J];清華法學(xué);2009年05期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張少林;被害人行為刑法意義之研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
本文編號(hào)：2217351
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2217351.html
教材專著
