【摘要】：為了維護國家機關的威信及其工作人員的形象，也為了保證國家機器的平穩(wěn)運行，我國1979年刑法典規(guī)定了招搖撞騙罪，1997年修訂后的刑法典在之前的基礎上增加了“冒充警察招搖撞騙的從重處罰”的規(guī)定。但是，由于受限于立法技術，加之司法解釋的缺失，使檢察官和法官們難以把握情節(jié)對相關案件進行準確定性。學界對于招搖撞騙罪的爭議也一直在持續(xù)，沒有形成一個主流的、使多數(shù)人信服的觀點。 本文選取了筆者在沈陽市人民檢察院實習期間協(xié)助辦理的一起真實案例，在全面分析被告人行為、被害人心理狀態(tài)等方面的基礎上，結合現(xiàn)階段學界的研究成果，總結出了招搖撞騙罪在司法實踐中出現(xiàn)的問題和解決方式。筆者著眼于本案的爭議焦點，認為被告人暴力行為的認定與否是招搖撞騙案件的疑難問題之一。在此類案件中，被告人做出的暴力行為通常是其冒充或者欺騙行為的組成部分，所以在暴力程度較低的情況下，不應當將其行為劃歸為暴力。同理于暴力的認定，諸如此類案件中被告人的系列行為包含的類似于脅迫、威脅或者要挾行為也應當予以全面考察。招搖撞騙罪與詐騙罪的競合問題也是司法實踐中的難點之一，，筆者在綜合各方觀點后，認為二者屬于法條競合中的交叉競合，應當按照“擇一重罪處罰”的原則進行處斷。 本案一審法院認定二被告人構成搶劫罪，并且屬于搶劫罪的加重情節(jié)——冒充軍警搶劫，判處二被告人有期徒刑十年，并處罰金。筆者認為該判決適用法律錯誤，從而導致判決有違我國刑法的罪責刑相適應原則。這同時也是筆者撰寫論文的目的，期望通過對案例的全面分析，結合案情，對該案有一個相對合理和中肯的結論，以期能夠?qū)φ袚u撞騙罪的相關司法實踐有些許幫助，為促進刑法保障人權和懲罰犯罪的結合奉獻綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:In order to maintain the prestige of state organs and the image of their staff, and also to ensure the smooth operation of the state machinery, The criminal code of our country in 1979 stipulated the crime of scamming and cheating, and the revised criminal code of 1997 added the stipulation of "the heavier punishment of impersonating police cheating" on the basis of the previous criminal code. However, due to the limitation of legislative techniques and the lack of judicial interpretation, it is difficult for prosecutors and judges to define the relevant cases accurately. The controversy about the crime of scamming and cheating has not formed a mainstream and convincing point of view. This paper selects a real case that the author assisted in the practice of Shenyang people's Procuratorate. On the basis of comprehensive analysis of the behavior of the defendant and the psychological state of the victim, combined with the current academic research results, Summed up the crime of deception in the judicial practice of the problems and solutions. Focusing on the focus of the dispute, the author thinks that the identification of the defendant's violent behavior is one of the difficult problems in the fraud case. In such cases, the acts of violence committed by the accused are usually part of their impersonation or deceit, so in the case of low level of violence, the acts should not be classified as violence. By the same token of violence, the series of actions of the accused in such cases should also be examined in a comprehensive way, similar to coercion, threats or threats. It is also one of the difficulties in judicial practice that the competition between the crime of scamming and cheating and the crime of fraud is one of the difficulties in judicial practice. After synthesizing the views of all parties, the author thinks that the two belong to the cross-competing of the competing articles of law, and should be decided according to the principle of "choosing a felony punishment". The court of first instance in this case found that the two defendants constituted the crime of robbery, and that the aggravated circumstance of the crime of robbery-impersonating military police robbery, sentenced the two defendants to fixed-term imprisonment of 10 years and a fine. The author thinks that the judgment is wrong in application of law, which results in the judgment being contrary to the principle of crime, responsibility and punishment of our country's criminal law. At the same time, it is the purpose of the author to write the thesis. I hope that through the comprehensive analysis of the case and the case, there will be a relatively reasonable and pertinent conclusion on the case, in the hope that it can be of some help to the relevant judicial practice of the crime of bluffing and cheating. To promote the criminal law to protect human rights and punish the combination of crime dedicated to a modest force.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 肖露;;淺析招搖撞騙罪的客觀要件[J];赤峰學院學報(科學教育版);2011年05期

2 韓光軍;楊新紅;;詐騙罪與招搖撞騙罪競合關系之論證[J];湖北社會科學;2008年04期

3 付立慶;;論軍警人員搶劫行為之法定刑適用[J];法學雜志;2007年04期

4 劉艷紅;冒充軍警人員實施搶劫罪之法定刑設置疏漏[J];法學;2000年06期

5 陳興良;;敲詐勒索罪與搶劫罪之界分——兼對“兩個當場”觀點的質(zhì)疑[J];法學;2011年02期

6 李磊;;冒充警察敲詐勒索與招搖撞騙之區(qū)別[J];法制與社會;2010年35期

7 楊建軍;;如何界定敲詐勒索罪中要挾行為的內(nèi)容[J];中國檢察官;2010年06期

8 王樹茂;;“冒充軍警人員搶劫”相關問題辨析[J];中國檢察官;2010年19期

9 蒲英華;張賀全;;招搖撞騙罪與詐騙罪法條競合時應如何定罪處罰[J];中國檢察官;2011年12期

10 緱澤昆;;詐騙罪中被害人的懷疑與錯誤——基于被害人解釋學的研究[J];清華法學;2009年05期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 張少林;被害人行為刑法意義之研究[D];華東政法大學;2010年

本文編號：2217351