組織淫穢表演罪定性問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-01 05:41
【摘要】：讀研期間，筆者有幸參與導(dǎo)師案頭的“黃賭毒”犯罪系列研究課題。自2013年4月以來，筆者重點(diǎn)研究刑法分則第六章第九節(jié)的淫穢物品犯罪。在搜集素材，翻閱資料的過程中，筆者了解了大量的典型案例，同時也注意到《刑法》第365條組織淫穢表演罪的條文簡單，相關(guān)的司法解釋和研究文獻(xiàn)寥寥無幾，在適用現(xiàn)下一些新形式的犯罪時還存在著較多的疑問。雖然本罪隸屬于刑法分則第六章第九節(jié)的淫穢物品犯罪，但淫穢表演與淫穢物品終究存在區(qū)別，不能一概地套用淫穢物品的相關(guān)司法解釋。因此筆者在思考的過程中對刑法第365條產(chǎn)生了越來越濃厚的討論興趣，并最終將此確定為畢業(yè)論文的題目。 現(xiàn)行刑法第365條規(guī)定：“組織進(jìn)行淫穢表演的，處三年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制，并處罰金；情節(jié)嚴(yán)重的，處三年以上十年以下有期徒刑，并處罰金�！北緱l著重規(guī)定組織淫穢表演罪的量刑，對組織淫穢表演罪的罪狀描述只字不提。因此，在司法實(shí)踐在處理社會中出現(xiàn)的一些更高級形式的淫穢表演時，總是會引來大大小小的爭議。例如，行為人利用藝術(shù)與宗教的神秘與主觀性，借神圣之名作低級之事，污染社會風(fēng)氣。藝術(shù)和宗教文化的除罪規(guī)定就如這類行為的保護(hù)傘，使法律總是在公權(quán)與私權(quán)之間面臨進(jìn)退的窘境；又如近幾年流行的裸模群拍活動，活動地點(diǎn)隱秘，一旦爆出又會引起社會的大波動，在適用法律條文時，罪數(shù)問題總無法統(tǒng)一。再如行為人借數(shù)字網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息的便利，直接通過網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播低級趣味信息，并從中牟取利益。組織淫穢表演罪的外延能否延伸至網(wǎng)絡(luò)裸聊突破傳統(tǒng)表演模式的行為，亦常有爭議�？偠灾�，刑法365條的條文過于簡單，在解決傳統(tǒng)組織淫穢表演的案例尚有余力，但面對現(xiàn)代社會千奇百怪的犯罪形式就顯得模糊寬泛。本文試著從本罪在定性方面存在爭議的三個案件出發(fā)，分析組織淫穢表演罪的定性界限，與他罪的關(guān)系，以及其最大外延。 全文共四章。 第一章對組織淫穢表演罪的立法主旨和沿革進(jìn)行概述，并提出三種組織淫穢表演罪的新類型在下文的的三章中具體展開。 第二章以“成力行為藝術(shù)”一案為例，討論幾種淫穢表演與行為藝術(shù)的可能界限標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，在論證排除的同時，最終得出淫穢表演與行為藝術(shù)的應(yīng)有界限。 第三章以“蔡某組織淫穢表演罪”一案為例，討論時下新興的“群拍”、“私拍”，分析組織淫穢表演罪與其他相似罪名的關(guān)系。進(jìn)而討論“群拍”，“私拍”現(xiàn)象的罪數(shù)問題。 第四章以“池某利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)聊天室組織淫穢表演罪”一案為例，以分類定性的方法討論組織淫穢表演罪對網(wǎng)絡(luò)裸聊的適用情形，并得出組織淫穢表演罪的最大外延。 本文通過這四章的討論，，期望能為本罪名的完善提供一個思路，并對實(shí)際操作中的組織淫穢表演罪的定性問題提供一些有價值的參考。
[Abstract]:During his graduate studies, the author was fortunate to participate in a series of research topics about the crime of pornography, gambling and drugs on his mentor's desk. Since April 2013, the author has focused on the crime of obscene articles in Chapter 6, Section 9 of the Criminal Law. In the course of collecting materials and reading through the materials, the author has learned a lot of typical cases, and has also noticed that the provisions of article 365 of the Criminal Law for organizing obscene performances are simple, and there are few relevant judicial interpretations and research documents. There are still more doubts about the application of some new forms of crime. Although this crime belongs to the crime of obscenity in the sixth chapter and the ninth section of the criminal law, there is a difference between obscene performance and obscene material, so it is impossible to apply the judicial explanation of obscene material. Therefore, in the process of thinking, the author has more and more strong interest in Article 365 of Criminal Law, and finally determines this as the topic of graduation thesis. Article 365 of the present Criminal Law stipulates: "whoever organizes pornographic performances shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance, and concurrently be sentenced to a fine; if the circumstances are serious, the offender shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years and not more than ten years, and shall also be sentenced to a fine." This article lays down the penalty for organizing obscene performance, and makes no mention of the description of the crime of organizing obscene performance. As a result, judicial practice in dealing with some of the more advanced forms of obscenity in society, will always lead to controversy large and small. For example, the actors use the mystery and subjectivity of art and religion to pollute the social atmosphere by doing inferior things in the name of sanctity. The decriminalization of art and religious culture, such as the umbrella for such acts, makes the law always face a dilemma between public rights and private rights. Once it breaks out, it will cause social fluctuation. When the law is applied, the problem of the number of crimes can not be unified. If the doer borrowed the convenience of digital network information, directly through the network dissemination of information of vulgar taste, and profit from it. Whether the extension of the crime of organizing obscene performance can extend to the behavior of online naked chat breaking through the traditional performance mode is also controversial. In a word, the article 365 of criminal law is too simple, in solving the case of traditional organization of obscene performance, there is Yu Li, but in the face of modern society, the criminal form is vague and broad. This paper tries to analyze the qualitative limits of the crime of organizing obscene performance, the relationship between the crime and the other crime, and its maximum extension from the three cases in which the nature of the crime is controversial. There are four chapters in this paper. The first chapter summarizes the legislative purport and evolution of the crime of organizing obscene performance, and puts forward three new types of the crime of organizing obscene performance in the following three chapters. The second chapter takes the case of "Chengli Behavioral Art" as an example to discuss the possible limits of several kinds of obscene performance and performance art. At the same time, the author concludes the limits of obscene performance and behavioral art. The third chapter takes the crime of organizing obscene performance by Cai as an example to discuss the relationship between the crime of organizing obscene performance and other similar charges. Then discusses the crime number of the phenomenon of "group pat" and "private racket". The fourth chapter takes the case of "the crime of organizing obscene performance by using network chat room" as an example, discusses the application of organizing obscene performance crime to network naked chat with the method of classification and qualitative, and obtains the maximum extension of organized obscene performance crime. Through the discussion of these four chapters, this paper hopes to provide a way of thinking for the perfection of this crime, and to provide some valuable reference for the qualitative problems of the crime of organizing obscene performance in practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
本文編號：2216275
[Abstract]:During his graduate studies, the author was fortunate to participate in a series of research topics about the crime of pornography, gambling and drugs on his mentor's desk. Since April 2013, the author has focused on the crime of obscene articles in Chapter 6, Section 9 of the Criminal Law. In the course of collecting materials and reading through the materials, the author has learned a lot of typical cases, and has also noticed that the provisions of article 365 of the Criminal Law for organizing obscene performances are simple, and there are few relevant judicial interpretations and research documents. There are still more doubts about the application of some new forms of crime. Although this crime belongs to the crime of obscenity in the sixth chapter and the ninth section of the criminal law, there is a difference between obscene performance and obscene material, so it is impossible to apply the judicial explanation of obscene material. Therefore, in the process of thinking, the author has more and more strong interest in Article 365 of Criminal Law, and finally determines this as the topic of graduation thesis. Article 365 of the present Criminal Law stipulates: "whoever organizes pornographic performances shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, criminal detention or public surveillance, and concurrently be sentenced to a fine; if the circumstances are serious, the offender shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years and not more than ten years, and shall also be sentenced to a fine." This article lays down the penalty for organizing obscene performance, and makes no mention of the description of the crime of organizing obscene performance. As a result, judicial practice in dealing with some of the more advanced forms of obscenity in society, will always lead to controversy large and small. For example, the actors use the mystery and subjectivity of art and religion to pollute the social atmosphere by doing inferior things in the name of sanctity. The decriminalization of art and religious culture, such as the umbrella for such acts, makes the law always face a dilemma between public rights and private rights. Once it breaks out, it will cause social fluctuation. When the law is applied, the problem of the number of crimes can not be unified. If the doer borrowed the convenience of digital network information, directly through the network dissemination of information of vulgar taste, and profit from it. Whether the extension of the crime of organizing obscene performance can extend to the behavior of online naked chat breaking through the traditional performance mode is also controversial. In a word, the article 365 of criminal law is too simple, in solving the case of traditional organization of obscene performance, there is Yu Li, but in the face of modern society, the criminal form is vague and broad. This paper tries to analyze the qualitative limits of the crime of organizing obscene performance, the relationship between the crime and the other crime, and its maximum extension from the three cases in which the nature of the crime is controversial. There are four chapters in this paper. The first chapter summarizes the legislative purport and evolution of the crime of organizing obscene performance, and puts forward three new types of the crime of organizing obscene performance in the following three chapters. The second chapter takes the case of "Chengli Behavioral Art" as an example to discuss the possible limits of several kinds of obscene performance and performance art. At the same time, the author concludes the limits of obscene performance and behavioral art. The third chapter takes the crime of organizing obscene performance by Cai as an example to discuss the relationship between the crime of organizing obscene performance and other similar charges. Then discusses the crime number of the phenomenon of "group pat" and "private racket". The fourth chapter takes the case of "the crime of organizing obscene performance by using network chat room" as an example, discusses the application of organizing obscene performance crime to network naked chat with the method of classification and qualitative, and obtains the maximum extension of organized obscene performance crime. Through the discussion of these four chapters, this paper hopes to provide a way of thinking for the perfection of this crime, and to provide some valuable reference for the qualitative problems of the crime of organizing obscene performance in practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 周羚敏;;組織淫穢表演罪的定罪量刑與擴(kuò)張重構(gòu)——兼對“裸聊”、“群拍”等現(xiàn)象的分析[J];寧波廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報;2012年01期
2 王家興;你犯了組織淫穢表演罪[J];政府法制;2004年22期
3 吳堅(jiān)芳;;寧某某組織淫穢表演案[J];法制與社會;2014年01期
4 ;一月回眸[J];法律與生活;1999年10期
5 吳加明;季愛華;;利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)聊天室組織淫穢表演的定罪與量刑[J];中國檢察官;2012年22期
6 ;案件簡訊[J];中國審判;2010年07期
7 黃韜;王艷麗利用網(wǎng)站組織淫穢表演案[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全技術(shù)與應(yīng)用;2004年12期
8 王文光;馬海濤;;香港與內(nèi)地有關(guān)“有傷風(fēng)化的表演”犯罪之比較研究[J];公安學(xué)刊;1998年02期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前7條
1 陸漫;談組織淫穢表演罪的構(gòu)成[N];人民法院報;2000年
2 記者 李國清 唐業(yè)繼;分貝網(wǎng)創(chuàng)始人鄭立犯組織淫穢表演罪獲刑6年[N];人民法院報;2010年
3 最高人民法院 朱和慶 劉靜坤;利用網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻組織淫穢表演的行為如何定罪[N];人民法院報;2010年
4 王峰;農(nóng)村節(jié)日文化亟待法律規(guī)范[N];法制日報;2007年
5 李文瑋 吳婉碧;組織淫穢表演當(dāng)受刑律制裁[N];檢察日報;2000年
6 陳洪兵;網(wǎng)上裸聊可能涉嫌多種犯罪[N];檢察日報;2007年
7 記者 黎昌政;“071”網(wǎng)上組織淫穢表演案開庭[N];新華每日電訊;2010年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 丁慧潔;組織淫穢表演罪定性問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年
本文編號：2216275
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2216275.html
教材專著
