【摘要】：仇恨犯罪的概念由來(lái)已久，無(wú)論是我國(guó)還是西方國(guó)家都有傳統(tǒng)復(fù)仇文化導(dǎo)致的犯罪，就可以說(shuō)是仇恨犯罪的雛形。美國(guó)以及部分歐洲國(guó)家早在數(shù)十年前就開(kāi)始研究仇恨犯罪，所以無(wú)論是立法司法還是執(zhí)法方面都有了一定的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。然而，我國(guó)無(wú)論是刑法學(xué)界還是刑事實(shí)踐活動(dòng)都對(duì)仇恨犯罪關(guān)注很少，即使有少數(shù)學(xué)者研究國(guó)外的仇恨犯罪理論，也更沒(méi)有從傳統(tǒng)復(fù)仇文化的深度去分析仇恨犯罪的社會(huì)危害性并進(jìn)入到立法可行性分析中去。由于我國(guó)將長(zhǎng)期處于社會(huì)主義發(fā)展的初級(jí)階段，，在現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)轉(zhuǎn)型的背景下，社會(huì)不和諧因素增加與各類矛盾凸顯，所以，和仇恨動(dòng)機(jī)相關(guān)的犯罪也漸漸增加。在這個(gè)背景下，我國(guó)刑法學(xué)界學(xué)者并沒(méi)有重視仇恨犯罪，對(duì)于仇恨犯罪的理論和實(shí)踐都研究甚少。因此，通過(guò)比較研究國(guó)內(nèi)外的仇恨犯罪理論和借鑒反思國(guó)外的立法模式，將有利于在立法和司法實(shí)踐中正確處理因仇恨而引發(fā)的犯罪問(wèn)題，充分打擊和懲治仇恨犯罪，保護(hù)公民的人身權(quán)利，緩和社會(huì)矛盾，保障社會(huì)穩(wěn)定和社會(huì)主義現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)事業(yè)順利進(jìn)展。
[Abstract]:The concept of hate crime has a long history, whether in our country or in western countries, the crime caused by traditional revenge culture can be said to be the embryonic form of hate crime. The United States and some European countries began to study hate crime decades ago, so they have some experience both in legislative, judicial and law enforcement. However, our country pays little attention to hate crime, not only in criminal law circles but also in criminal practice, even though there are a few scholars who study the theory of hate crime in foreign countries. It also does not analyze the social harmfulness of hate crime from the depth of traditional revenge culture and enter into the feasibility analysis of legislation. As our country will be in the primary stage of socialist development for a long time, under the background of modernization construction transformation, the increase of social disharmony factors and all kinds of contradictions highlight, therefore, the crime related to hate motive is also gradually increasing. In this context, the scholars of criminal law in our country do not attach importance to hate crime, and the theory and practice of hate crime are seldom studied. Therefore, by comparing the theory of hate crime at home and abroad and reflecting on the legislative model of foreign countries, it will be beneficial to correctly deal with the crime caused by hatred in legislation and judicial practice, and to crack down and punish hate crime adequately. To protect citizens' personal rights, ease social conflicts, and ensure social stability and smooth progress in socialist modernization.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張莉;;從《美狄亞》與《趙氏孤兒》的復(fù)仇心理刻畫看中西文化傳統(tǒng)[J];廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

2 李愛(ài)慧;;美華協(xié)會(huì)與美國(guó)華人和亞裔的權(quán)益維護(hù)[J];東南亞研究;2011年06期

3 田宏杰;恐怖主義犯罪的界定[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

4 夏勇,王焰;我國(guó)學(xué)界對(duì)恐怖主義犯罪定義研究的綜述[J];法商研究;2004年01期

5 張?chǎng)蜺

本文編號(hào)：2215283