我國醉酒駕駛行為刑法規(guī)制研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-25 10:04
【摘要】：自從《刑法修正案(八)》拉開醉駕入刑帷幕以來,有關(guān)醉酒駕駛行為刑法規(guī)制的議題就一直保持著較高的熱度�！缎谭ㄐ拚�(九)》對危險駕駛罪進行了完善,其中構(gòu)成危險駕駛罪的醉酒駕駛這一客觀行為方式依然沿用了刑法修正案(八)的內(nèi)容,同時,學(xué)界對危險駕駛罪中最受關(guān)注的行為方式——醉酒駕駛行為的討論卻從未停止。在理論界,有關(guān)醉酒駕駛行為是否應(yīng)當入罪、是否適用“但書”出罪、罪過形式、醉酒標準等問題引起了學(xué)者們廣泛的討論,在實務(wù)界,處實刑還是緩刑、量刑是否均衡等方面也同樣存在諸多問題。社會上的媒體、學(xué)者及司法人員對醉酒駕駛這一議題也是頗為關(guān)注。本文在前人的研究基礎(chǔ)上,對我國醉酒駕駛行為刑法規(guī)制問題進行進一步的探析,主體部分共包括四個模塊:第一個模塊從法理分析的角度對醉酒駕駛犯罪是否存在例外情形進行了詳細地分析�？紤]到醉駕入刑已經(jīng)成為事實這一原因,本文結(jié)合了典型案例重點討論了醉酒駕駛行為能否存在不入罪的例外情形,最后給出了醉酒駕駛一律入刑的觀點。接著對醉駕型危險駕駛罪的性質(zhì)進行了分類解析,闡述了行為犯與危險犯、具體危險犯與抽象危險犯的概念,又結(jié)合醉酒駕駛行為的本質(zhì)特征與前述概念的相同之處,對醉駕型危險駕駛罪進行了歸類,最終分析得出醉駕型危險駕駛罪屬于抽象危險犯的范疇。第二個模塊分析了醉駕型危險駕駛罪犯罪構(gòu)成。對其客觀行為方式進行了深入的剖析,特別是對該罪的核心——醉酒標準進行了全面的討論,并主張采用主客觀結(jié)合的方法來判定是否達到實質(zhì)醉酒狀態(tài)。對該罪的主觀方面也進行了論述,認為主觀上具有罪過都要承擔責任。第三個模塊主要從此罪與彼罪的層面闡述了醉駕型危險駕駛罪與相關(guān)犯罪的界限。緊扣客觀行為方式和行為后果比較了醉駕型危險駕駛罪與相關(guān)犯罪的不同之處,以期在司法實務(wù)中對醉駕行為的準確定性提供幫助。第四個模塊重點介紹了一些發(fā)達國家對醉酒駕駛行為的刑法規(guī)制制度。在與域外法律制度的對比中發(fā)現(xiàn)問題,通過對問題的分析,本文也就立法、司法實踐中的不足之處給出了一些對策,以期不斷完善我國醉酒駕駛行為刑法規(guī)制體系。
[Abstract]:Since the "Amendment of the Criminal Law (8) > opened the curtain of driving drunk into the death penalty, the topic of criminal law regulation on drunk driving behavior has always maintained a relatively high degree of heat. < Amendment (9) > of the Criminal Law has improved the crime of dangerous driving." The objective behavior of drunken driving, which constitutes the crime of dangerous driving, still follows the content of the Criminal Law Amendment (8). At the same time, the discussion of drunken driving, the most concerned behavior in the crime of dangerous driving, has never stopped in academic circles. In the theoretical circle, whether drunken driving behavior should be criminalized, whether the crime of "proviso" should be applied, the form of crime, the standard of drunkenness and so on has aroused extensive discussion among scholars. In the practical field, the actual punishment is still suspended. There are also many problems in the balance of sentencing. The media, academics and judiciary are also concerned about drunk driving. On the basis of previous studies, this paper makes a further analysis of the criminal regulation of drunken driving behavior in China. The main part consists of four modules: the first module analyzes in detail whether there are exceptions to the crime of drunk driving from the point of view of legal theory. Considering the fact that drunken driving has become a fact, this paper mainly discusses whether there is an exception to the crime of drunken driving in combination with typical cases, and finally gives the point of view that drunken driving is uniformly punished. Then, it analyzes the nature of drunk driving dangerous driving crime, expounds the concepts of behavior crime and dangerous crime, concrete dangerous crime and abstract dangerous crime, and combines the essential characteristics of drunken driving behavior with the same place of the above-mentioned concept. This paper classifies the crime of drunk driving dangerous driving, and finally concludes that the crime of drunk driving belongs to the category of abstract dangerous crime. The second module analyzes the constitution of the crime of drunk driving dangerous driving. This paper makes a deep analysis of its objective behavior mode, especially discusses the core of the crime-drunkenness standard, and advocates to use the method of combining subjective and objective to judge whether the actual drunken state has been achieved. The subjective aspect of the crime is also discussed. The third module mainly expounds the boundary between drunk driving dangerous driving crime and related crimes. This paper compares the difference between the crime of drunk driving dangerous driving and the related crime by clinging to the objective behavior and the consequences in order to provide help for the accurate characterization of drunken driving in judicial practice. The fourth module mainly introduces some developed countries' criminal law regulation system on drunken driving behavior. Through the analysis of the problems, this paper also gives some countermeasures on the shortcomings of legislation and judicial practice, in order to improve the criminal law regulation system of drunken driving behavior in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D924.3
[Abstract]:Since the "Amendment of the Criminal Law (8) > opened the curtain of driving drunk into the death penalty, the topic of criminal law regulation on drunk driving behavior has always maintained a relatively high degree of heat. < Amendment (9) > of the Criminal Law has improved the crime of dangerous driving." The objective behavior of drunken driving, which constitutes the crime of dangerous driving, still follows the content of the Criminal Law Amendment (8). At the same time, the discussion of drunken driving, the most concerned behavior in the crime of dangerous driving, has never stopped in academic circles. In the theoretical circle, whether drunken driving behavior should be criminalized, whether the crime of "proviso" should be applied, the form of crime, the standard of drunkenness and so on has aroused extensive discussion among scholars. In the practical field, the actual punishment is still suspended. There are also many problems in the balance of sentencing. The media, academics and judiciary are also concerned about drunk driving. On the basis of previous studies, this paper makes a further analysis of the criminal regulation of drunken driving behavior in China. The main part consists of four modules: the first module analyzes in detail whether there are exceptions to the crime of drunk driving from the point of view of legal theory. Considering the fact that drunken driving has become a fact, this paper mainly discusses whether there is an exception to the crime of drunken driving in combination with typical cases, and finally gives the point of view that drunken driving is uniformly punished. Then, it analyzes the nature of drunk driving dangerous driving crime, expounds the concepts of behavior crime and dangerous crime, concrete dangerous crime and abstract dangerous crime, and combines the essential characteristics of drunken driving behavior with the same place of the above-mentioned concept. This paper classifies the crime of drunk driving dangerous driving, and finally concludes that the crime of drunk driving belongs to the category of abstract dangerous crime. The second module analyzes the constitution of the crime of drunk driving dangerous driving. This paper makes a deep analysis of its objective behavior mode, especially discusses the core of the crime-drunkenness standard, and advocates to use the method of combining subjective and objective to judge whether the actual drunken state has been achieved. The subjective aspect of the crime is also discussed. The third module mainly expounds the boundary between drunk driving dangerous driving crime and related crimes. This paper compares the difference between the crime of drunk driving dangerous driving and the related crime by clinging to the objective behavior and the consequences in order to provide help for the accurate characterization of drunken driving in judicial practice. The fourth module mainly introduces some developed countries' criminal law regulation system on drunken driving behavior. Through the analysis of the problems, this paper also gives some countermeasures on the shortcomings of legislation and judicial practice, in order to improve the criminal law regulation system of drunken driving behavior in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D924.3
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 趙晨鷹;青年攻擊性駕駛行為的成因研究[J];青年研究;2003年12期
2 榮亮;盧思宇;;淺析醉酒駕駛行為的定性[J];法制與社會;2011年20期
3 荀福崢;;淺析醉酒駕駛行為的法律規(guī)制[J];行政與法;2012年08期
4 張思思;;理性看待醉酒駕駛行為的刑法規(guī)制[J];法制與社會;2014年10期
5 蘇永生;;醉酒駕駛行為的界定[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期
6 靳婷;;美國道路交通安全法對“分心駕駛行為”的預(yù)防懲治措施及啟示[J];中國檢察官;2013年04期
7 李堯s，
本文編號：2202548
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2202548.html
