【摘要】：瀆職罪司法認(rèn)定中,因果關(guān)系作為定罪要素,側(cè)重定性判斷,應(yīng)建立以瀆職行為與危害結(jié)果為證明核心的推定式因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定機(jī)制。同時(shí),契合瀆職行為專業(yè)性、行業(yè)化屬性,建議以類案危害結(jié)果具體形式的法定化,實(shí)現(xiàn)因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定依據(jù)的客觀化。針對客觀歸罪問題,應(yīng)注重考查在以間接損失為危害結(jié)果表現(xiàn)形式的失職型瀆職案件中行為人的注意能力,并考慮不同時(shí)期國家政策、特別是行業(yè)政策對瀆職罪定罪的影響。
[Abstract]:In judicial cognizance of dereliction of duty, causality, as a key element of conviction, should be emphasized on qualitative judgment, and the mechanism of presumption causality should be established with malfeasance and the result of harm as the core of proof. At the same time, in line with the professional dereliction of duty, the industry attribute, it is suggested that the specific form of legalization of the result of harm in the case of category, to realize the objectivity of the basis of causality. In view of the problem of objective incrimination, we should pay attention to the attention ability of the perpetrators in dereliction of duty cases with indirect loss as the result of harm, and consider the influence of national policies, especially industry policies, on the conviction of dereliction of duty in different periods.
【作者單位】： 河南省人民檢察院法律政策研究室;
【分類號】：D924.393

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝勇;陳振光;;論刑法上引入疫學(xué)因果關(guān)系的正當(dāng)性[J];湖南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

2 肖揚(yáng)宇;;定罪因果關(guān)系及認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的建構(gòu)——從兩個(gè)案例切入[J];華北水利水電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2012年01期

3 權(quán)新廣;;試談刑法中的因果關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)研究;1963年03期

4 夏起經(jīng);;刑法中的因果關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)研究;1981年02期

5 梅o，

本文編號：2174516