【摘要】：在當(dāng)今世界各國(guó)，行為人陷入醉態(tài)后實(shí)施侵害法益的現(xiàn)象屢見(jiàn)不鮮，各國(guó)對(duì)醉態(tài)行為人刑事責(zé)任的規(guī)定不一，理論上存在分歧。我國(guó)在立法上僅規(guī)定了醉酒人的刑罰，且并未對(duì)“醉態(tài)”進(jìn)行明確的界定。這給司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)醉態(tài)后刑事責(zé)任的追究帶來(lái)了諸多困惑。因此，開(kāi)展涵蓋酒精、毒品和藥物等具有致醉藥理物質(zhì)的醉態(tài)理論研究以及完善我國(guó)醉態(tài)相關(guān)立法具有現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。通過(guò)運(yùn)用醫(yī)學(xué)、精神病學(xué)和心理學(xué)的相關(guān)知識(shí)，界定出醉態(tài)的概念并且總結(jié)出其特征。接著，，詳細(xì)梳理了大陸法系中的原因自由行為，并闡述了我國(guó)“三根據(jù)說(shuō)”、“嚴(yán)格責(zé)任說(shuō)”等醉態(tài)理論的主要內(nèi)容及其缺陷，經(jīng)研究分析發(fā)現(xiàn)“原因自由行為”能更為科學(xué)有效地解決醉態(tài)行為人刑事責(zé)任承擔(dān)的問(wèn)題，因此提出在我國(guó)犯罪構(gòu)成理論框架的基礎(chǔ)上吸收“原因自由行為”理論中的合理之處的建議，即根據(jù)醉態(tài)行為人陷入醉態(tài)的主觀心理，分類討論醉態(tài)行為人的責(zé)任能力狀況。最后，根據(jù)重新構(gòu)建的醉態(tài)理論，對(duì)《刑法》總則以及分則中醉態(tài)相關(guān)立法提出自己的修改建議。
[Abstract]:In today's world, the phenomenon that the perpetrator is in a drunken state to violate the legal interests is not uncommon. There are different regulations on criminal liability of the drunk actor in various countries, and there are differences in theory. Our country only prescribes the penalty of drunken person in the legislation, and does not carry on the clear definition to the "drunken state". This brings a lot of confusion to the investigation of criminal liability after drunken state in judicial practice. Therefore, it is of practical significance to carry out the theoretical research on drunken state including alcohol, drugs and drugs, and to perfect the relevant legislation of drunken state in our country. By using relevant knowledge of medicine, psychiatry and psychology, the concept of drunken state is defined and its characteristics are summed up. Then, the article combs the reason free behavior in the continental law system in detail, and expounds the main contents and defects of the drunk state theory such as "three bases theory" and "strict liability theory" in our country. Through research and analysis, it is found that "the cause of free action" can more scientifically and effectively solve the problem of criminal liability of drunk behavior. Therefore, on the basis of the theoretical framework of the constitution of crime in our country, it is proposed to absorb the reasonable place in the theory of "free action of reason", that is to say, according to the subjective psychology of drunken actor falling into drunken state, the author classifies and discusses the responsibility ability of drunken actor. Finally, according to the theory of reconstructing drunken state, the author puts forward some suggestions to amend the general rules of Criminal Law and the relevant legislation of drunken state in the specific provisions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫運(yùn)梁;;醉酒人犯罪刑事責(zé)任的立法比較與法理分析[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

2 付立慶;論生理醉酒犯罪的刑事責(zé)任——比較、分梳與改造[J];法律與醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2002年02期

3 趙秉志;;論原因自由行為中實(shí)行行為的著手問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年05期

4 黃晶;;從醉酒犯罪刑事責(zé)任論原因自由行為——對(duì)范某故意傷害和殺人案的刑事責(zé)任研究[J];廣州市公安管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

5 王晶;;我國(guó)犯罪構(gòu)成理論評(píng)析[J];貴州民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

6 賴早興;;美國(guó)刑事法中的能力減弱辯護(hù)制度及其啟示[J];法商研究;2012年05期

7 林思婷;;淺論醉態(tài)形式的分類[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2012年01期

8 胡雪萍;論醉酒人犯罪的刑事責(zé)任[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

9 李潤(rùn)華;;“醉酒人”犯罪負(fù)擔(dān)刑事責(zé)任的依據(jù)與判斷[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2012年12期

10 勞娃;論我國(guó)刑法中的嚴(yán)格責(zé)任[J];上海公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

本文編號(hào)：2172840