發(fā)布時間：2018-07-31 06:42

【摘要】：為能更好的對綁架犯罪進行治理,我國先后于1991年、1997年、2009年、2015年四次在刑法規(guī)范層面對綁架罪進行了修改、補充、完善,形成了一個較為科學(xué)的刑罰體系,為治理綁架犯罪提供了堅強的法律保障。然而,綁架罪在立法上的抽象性以及綁架罪罪質(zhì)本身的復(fù)雜性,導(dǎo)致了人們對綁架犯罪的認(rèn)識上存在差異。這種認(rèn)識上的差異作用于司法實踐中,就會出現(xiàn)“同樣的情況不同的處理”的現(xiàn)象。在這些認(rèn)識差異中,綁架罪的犯罪形態(tài)爭議最激烈。因上述認(rèn)識問題,不同司法者對具體個案的評價不同,其審判結(jié)果也就自然存在差異,甚至出入較大。為此,我們就有必要對綁架罪的犯罪完成形態(tài)進行探討和研究,筆者主要根據(jù)《刑法修正案(七)》、《刑法修正案(九)》從綁架罪的基本犯罪、綁架罪的加重和減輕的犯罪構(gòu)成來討論綁架罪的既遂未遂問題。本文主要從以下幾個部分來論述。緒論:從故意犯罪停止形態(tài)的概念、特征及意義來研究綁架罪既遂的意義,以及從理論和實踐兩個角度簡要概述綁架罪既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的爭議。第一章:從綁架罪的立法沿革上,著重以《刑法修正案(七)》、《刑法修正案(九)》的修正背景和修正內(nèi)容,研究對綁架罪既遂認(rèn)定的影響。第二章:結(jié)合經(jīng)典案例探討綁架罪基本犯既遂的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),從綁架罪的法益界定和綁架罪的實行行為兩個角度來分析,什么時候構(gòu)成綁架罪基本犯的既遂。第三章:從結(jié)果加重犯的角度研究刑法239條第2款,“殺害被綁架人”、“故意傷害被綁架人,致人重傷”和“故意傷害被綁架人,致人死亡”有無既遂未遂。第四章:從情節(jié)犯的角度分析綁架罪情節(jié)犯的既遂問題,分別分析情節(jié)犯的含義,情節(jié)犯是否存在犯罪未遂形態(tài),得出“情節(jié)較輕”是情節(jié)犯的結(jié)論,結(jié)合經(jīng)典案例對綁架罪“情節(jié)較輕”的“情節(jié)”內(nèi)涵、要素以及綁架罪“情節(jié)較輕”的既遂界定。通過這幾部分論述來明確綁架罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn),更好地去指導(dǎo)實踐以求形成統(tǒng)一共識,避免同樣情況不同處理的現(xiàn)象發(fā)生,從而有效維護好人們的合法權(quán)益,維護社會的的安定性和刑法的權(quán)威性。
[Abstract]:In order to deal with the kidnapping crime better, in 1991, 1997, 2009 and 2015, the crime of kidnapping was revised, supplemented and perfected four times in 1991, 1997, 2009 and 2015, and a more scientific penalty system was formed. For the control of kidnapping crime to provide a strong legal protection. However, the abstract nature of the crime of kidnapping in legislation and the complexity of the crime of kidnapping itself lead to differences in people's understanding of the crime of kidnapping. This kind of difference of understanding acts on the judicial practice, and the phenomenon of "the same situation and different treatment" will appear. Among these differences, the criminal form of kidnapping is the most controversial. As a result of the above problems, different judiciaries have different evaluation of specific cases, and their trial results are naturally different, or even quite different. Therefore, it is necessary for us to probe into and study the complete form of the crime of kidnapping. According to the Criminal Law Amendment (7), the Criminal Law Amendment (9), from the basic crime of kidnapping, The crime of kidnapping is aggravated and mitigated to discuss the problem of attempted accomplishment of the crime of kidnapping. This article mainly discusses from the following several parts. Introduction: to study the significance of accomplished kidnapping crime from the concept, characteristics and significance of the form of intentional crime cessation, and briefly summarize the controversy of the standard of accomplished kidnapping crime from two angles of theory and practice. Chapter one: from the legislative evolution of the crime of kidnapping, with the amendment background and content of "Amendment of Criminal Law (7) > and" Amendment of Criminal Law "(9), the author studies the influence on the conviction of the crime of kidnapping. The second chapter discusses the standard of accomplishing the basic crime of kidnapping in combination with classic cases, and analyzes from the two angles of the definition of legal interests of the crime of kidnapping and the practice of the crime of kidnapping, when constitutes the accomplished of the basic crime of kidnapping. Chapter three: from the point of view of aggravated consequential offense, the article 239 (2) of Criminal Law, "killing kidnapped person", "intentionally injuring kidnapped person, causing serious injury" and "intentionally injuring kidnapped person, causing death" is attempted or not. Chapter four: from the angle of plot crime, analyze the accomplished problem of kidnapping crime, analyze the meaning of plot crime, whether the plot offender has the form of attempted crime, and draw the conclusion that "the plot is lighter" is the plot crime. Combined with classic cases, the connotation of "plot" of the crime of kidnapping is lighter, the elements and the accomplishment of the crime of kidnapping are defined. Through these several parts of discussion to clarify the accomplished standard of kidnapping crime, better guide the practice in order to form a unified consensus, to avoid the phenomenon of different treatment of the same situation, so as to effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of people. To maintain the stability of society and the authority of criminal law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張明楷;;綁架罪的基本問題[J];法學(xué);2016年04期

2 曾慶云;;綁架罪及其類型化分析[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2014年12期

3 聶郁蒙;;綁架罪爭議問題淺析[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年05期

4 陳越;;論綁架罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];湖南科技學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年08期

5 付立慶;;綁架罪既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的重新論證——以刑法修正案(七)的相關(guān)修改為背景[J];法學(xué)評論;2012年01期

6 吳情樹;;綁架罪中“情節(jié)較輕”的辯證分析——基于對《刑法修正案(七)》第六條的思考[J];政治與法律;2010年03期

7 梅錦;;綁架罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)探究[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年01期

8 楊志國;;認(rèn)定綁架罪“情節(jié)較輕”的幾個理論問題[J];中國刑事法雜志;2009年11期

9 周帆;張冬霞;;綁架罪之法定刑分析——兼論《刑法修正案(七)》對綁架罪的修改[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期

10 王志祥;;綁架罪中“殺害被綁架人”新論[J];法商研究;2008年02期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 黃祥青;;綁架罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及認(rèn)定思路[N];人民法院報;2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張文娟;綁架罪司法認(rèn)定疑難問題研究[D];云南大學(xué);2015年

2 蔡正猛;綁架罪中“殺害被綁架人”問題研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2014年

3 李馨雅;綁架罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)認(rèn)定[D];華東政法大學(xué);2013年

4 敖軍榮;綁架犯罪形態(tài)研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2012年

5 滿春梅;綁架罪相關(guān)犯罪形態(tài)的司法界定[D];蘭州大學(xué);2012年

6 潘宗洪;罪刑均衡視野下的綁架罪法定刑配置問題研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2012年

7 郭，

本文編號：2154756