發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-23 13:02

【摘要】：縱觀世界各國(guó)歷史,史料中記載的發(fā)生在同性之間的性行為的現(xiàn)象屢見不鮮。在我國(guó)古代有些朝代甚至男風(fēng)曾盛行一時(shí)。在當(dāng)代,隨著社會(huì)文化的發(fā)展,人們逐漸對(duì)一些觀念和現(xiàn)象通過日漸發(fā)達(dá)的媒介得以了解,發(fā)生在同性間的性行為的現(xiàn)象也呈現(xiàn)上升的趨勢(shì)。近年來,關(guān)于發(fā)生在同性間的強(qiáng)行性行為的案例也頻繁見諸于各種媒體終端。而依據(jù)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行《刑法》,對(duì)于同性之間的強(qiáng)行性行為沒有像強(qiáng)奸罪以及相關(guān)條款一樣加以明確規(guī)定,而這種“犯罪”行為與強(qiáng)奸罪等犯罪行為具有相當(dāng)?shù)纳鐣?huì)危害性。因此,研究同性強(qiáng)行性行為的刑事立法規(guī)制對(duì)于保護(hù)受害群體具有積極的意義。 我國(guó)法律史以及世界上一些國(guó)家的法律史上,早已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)過對(duì)于同性強(qiáng)行性行為的法律上的規(guī)定。但發(fā)展至今,鑒于我國(guó)《刑法》對(duì)于此種“犯罪”行為的規(guī)定并不完善,我國(guó)在刑事立法上應(yīng)該在參考各國(guó)相關(guān)立法以及我國(guó)古代出現(xiàn)過的相關(guān)法律的基礎(chǔ)上,加以借鑒,在不盲目照搬照抄的前提下,發(fā)展符合我國(guó)當(dāng)今以及以后一定時(shí)期內(nèi)較為事宜的法律。 筆者以案例分析的形式對(duì)同性強(qiáng)行性行為進(jìn)行法律分析,并在結(jié)尾部分提出立法上的完善建議,總共分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分,由人民法院典型判決案例引出研究同性強(qiáng)行性行為的研究背景以及本文的研究方法,闡述本文的研究現(xiàn)狀及意義。 第二部分,圍繞案例涉及的罪名進(jìn)行相關(guān)法律條文分析,并結(jié)合法律規(guī)定,厘清同性強(qiáng)行性行為與強(qiáng)奸行為的關(guān)系與界限。 第三部分,列舉我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)同性強(qiáng)行性行為的司法上的處理和態(tài)度。 第四部分,綜合前面幾個(gè)部分的分析,將同性強(qiáng)行性行為作為獨(dú)立的犯罪行為定罪量刑是合理的,據(jù)此明確刑事立法上應(yīng)如何將其規(guī)制,從而為彌補(bǔ)我國(guó)《刑法》在此領(lǐng)域的缺失提出建設(shè)性的完善意見。
[Abstract]:Throughout the history of the world, the phenomenon of same-sex recorded in historical data is common. In ancient China, some dynasties and even male style once prevailed. Nowadays, with the development of social culture, people gradually understand some ideas and phenomena through the increasingly developed media, and the phenomenon of same-sex also shows an upward trend. In recent years, cases of forced sex between men and women have been frequently reported in various media terminals. According to the present Criminal Law of our country, the forcible sexual behavior between the same sex is not clearly defined as the crime of rape and the related provisions, and this kind of criminal behavior has the social harmfulness with the crime of rape and so on. Therefore, it is of positive significance to study the criminal legislation for the protection of victims. In the legal history of our country and some countries in the world, there have been some legal provisions on the forced sexual act of the same sex. But up to now, in view of the fact that the criminal law of our country is not perfect for this kind of "crime", our country should refer to the relevant legislation of other countries and the relevant laws that appeared in ancient China on the basis of our country's criminal legislation. Under the premise of not blindly copying and copying, the development accords with the relative laws of our country at present and in a certain period. The author carries on the legal analysis to the same-sex forced sexual act by the form of the case analysis, and in the end part puts forward the legislation consummation suggestion, altogether divides into four parts: the first part, The research background and research method of this paper are introduced from the typical cases of people's court judgment, and the research status and significance of this paper are expounded. In the second part, the author analyzes the relevant legal provisions about the crimes involved in the case, and clarifies the relationship and boundary between the forced sexual act of the same sex and the rape act in combination with the legal provisions. The third part, enumerates our country judicial practice to the same sex forcible sexual behavior judicial processing and the attitude. In the fourth part, synthesizing the analysis of the previous several parts, it is reasonable to convict and sentence the same sex forcible sexual act as an independent criminal act, so it is clear how to regulate it in the criminal legislation. In order to make up for the lack of criminal law in this field, put forward constructive suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹耀波;;刑法新增同性性侵害條款之小議[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年08期

2 馬志敏;;淺議男性成為強(qiáng)奸罪對(duì)象的可行性[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年24期

3 鄧思;從鄭州首例同性性騷擾案引起的法律思考[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年S1期

4 涂龍科;徐秀紅;;中美強(qiáng)奸罪比較研究[J];河海大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年01期

5 孟慶豐,王永柏,趙剛;126例女性精神病人性侵害案例分析[J];上海精神醫(yī)學(xué);2003年01期

6 李立眾;臺(tái)灣島強(qiáng)奸罪立法之新發(fā)展[J];人民檢察;2000年11期

7 邱玉梅,陳如春;美國(guó)刑法強(qiáng)奸罪之研究[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

8 何承斌,龔?fù)ね?強(qiáng)奸罪立法的反思與重構(gòu)[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年05期

9 張杰;清代有關(guān)同性性犯罪的法律規(guī)定及對(duì)當(dāng)前相關(guān)立法的啟示[J];中國(guó)性科學(xué);2004年03期

10 劉衛(wèi)紅;;刑法視野下的同性性侵犯[J];中國(guó)性科學(xué);2007年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2139495