本文選題：過(guò)罪化 + 空白罪狀��； 參考：《法學(xué)》2017年09期

【摘要】：在犯罪構(gòu)成中,由行政機(jī)關(guān)通過(guò)各種形式補(bǔ)充的入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn),具有具體性和精確性的特點(diǎn),形成了非常直觀的硬性界限。然而,以行政性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)而入罪的案件常常與人們公平正義的價(jià)值目標(biāo)追求形成沖突。立法權(quán)的讓渡形成了行政機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)刑法的干預(yù)空間以及行政權(quán)擴(kuò)張刑法干預(yù)范圍的過(guò)罪化風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。這一風(fēng)險(xiǎn)較刑法自身的犯罪化更為隱蔽而尚未引起人們的警覺(jué)。標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的具體性不等于刑法認(rèn)定犯罪界限的精確性,即使是高度精確的數(shù)據(jù)化標(biāo)準(zhǔn),其界限仍然是人為的選擇。刑法的邊界不能完全任由行政機(jī)關(guān)劃定。面對(duì)行政性的入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn),司法應(yīng)秉持自身的獨(dú)立性,對(duì)行政機(jī)關(guān)確定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)承擔(dān)起實(shí)質(zhì)驗(yàn)證的責(zé)任。標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的采納與超越并不矛盾,對(duì)于明顯偏離刑法目的的行政性標(biāo)準(zhǔn),通過(guò)個(gè)案的司法綜合裁量予以矯正或者重新詮釋,以激活行政性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與刑法價(jià)值的勾連,凸顯刑事司法追求的公平正義目標(biāo)。
[Abstract]:In the constitution of crime, the standard of incrimination supplemented by various forms by administrative organs has the characteristics of concreteness and precision, and forms a very intuitive and rigid boundary. However, cases that are criminalized by administrative standards often conflict with people's pursuit of the value goal of fairness and justice. The transfer of legislative power forms the space for administrative organs to intervene in criminal law and the risk of over-criminalization of expanding the scope of criminal law intervention by administrative power. This risk is more concealed than the criminal law itself and has not aroused people's vigilance. The concreteness of the standard is not equal to the accuracy of the boundary of the criminal law, even if it is a highly accurate standard of data, the limit is still a man-made choice. The boundaries of the criminal law cannot be entirely left to the administrative authorities. In the face of administrative incrimination standards, the judiciary should uphold its own independence and bear the responsibility of substantive verification of the standards established by the administrative organs. There is no contradiction between the adoption and transcendence of the standard. For the administrative standard which deviates obviously from the purpose of criminal law, it can be corrected or reinterpreted by the judicial comprehensive discretion of the individual case in order to activate the connection between the administrative standard and the value of the criminal law. Highlight the goal of fairness and justice pursued by criminal justice.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金后期資助項(xiàng)目“貪污賄賂犯罪研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):14FFX31)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3
，

本文編號(hào)：1951850