本文選題：編造 + 故意傳播　； 參考：《沈陽師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：《中華人民共和國刑法》第二百九十一條所規(guī)定的罪名是：“聚眾擾亂公共場所秩序、交通秩序罪；投放虛假危險物質(zhì)罪；編造、故意傳播虛假恐怖信息罪”，在此罪中的第二款有明確的規(guī)定：“編造爆炸威脅、生化威脅、放射威脅等恐怖信息，，或者明知是編造的恐怖信息而故意傳播，嚴(yán)重擾亂社會秩序的，處五年以下有期徒刑、拘役或者管制；造成嚴(yán)重后果的，處五年以上有期徒刑�！本幵�、故意傳播虛假恐怖信息罪立法的原本意思是為了有效的打壓猖狂的恐怖犯罪，但是現(xiàn)如今隨著社會多樣化的出現(xiàn)，卻偏離了最初的航向，向著規(guī)制社會公眾秩序的方向發(fā)展。編造、故意傳播虛假恐怖信息的行為特別容易引起人群的恐慌，讓人們的心理產(chǎn)生不安,使社會安定有序的狀態(tài)變得特別的混亂,甚至嚴(yán)重的危及到公民財產(chǎn)的所有權(quán)和人身的安全。本篇文章通過對一系列案例進(jìn)行剖析,對有關(guān)的法律問題進(jìn)行深入的思考,以使編造、故意傳播虛假恐怖信息罪在刑法中更好的發(fā)揮作用。 本篇文章主要通過案例分析法、實證分析法，比較分析法等一系列研究方法主要從以下四個方面對編造、故意傳播虛假恐怖信息罪的構(gòu)成進(jìn)行了分析：首先通過對王文澤編造傳播“明天要炸上海浦東機(jī)場”短信案的一些焦點問題進(jìn)行分析來對何為“編造”以及何為“故意傳播”進(jìn)行認(rèn)定，并明確了本罪的主觀方面。其次通過對林曉燕案中的一些焦點問題進(jìn)行分析，剖析出何為“虛假”信息以及何為“恐怖”信息，從而對虛假恐怖信息的認(rèn)定進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的闡述。然后又要通過李宗民案來說明什么樣的行為構(gòu)成“嚴(yán)重擾亂社會秩序”，達(dá)到何種程度可稱為“嚴(yán)重”。最后通過對馮玉鵬編造虛假恐怖信息勒索錢財案說明了達(dá)到何種程度才屬于“造成嚴(yán)重后果”，主要通過對案例進(jìn)行分析來闡明了什么樣的后果才是嚴(yán)重后果。 通過上述幾個典型案例的分析，編造、故意傳播虛假恐怖信息罪構(gòu)罪的條件及定罪量刑的適用將變得更加明確。
[Abstract]:The crimes stipulated in Article 291 of the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China are: "the crime of gathering a crowd to disturb the order of public places and traffic order; the crime of putting in false dangerous substances; and the crime of fabricating and deliberately disseminating false terrorist information", In the second paragraph of this crime, there is a clear provision: "whoever fabricates terrorist information such as explosive threat, biological threat, radiological threat, or knowingly disseminates the fabricated terrorist information, and seriously disrupts public order, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years," Criminal detention or public surveillance; if serious consequences are caused, the offender shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years. " The original intention of the legislation on the crime of fabricating and deliberately disseminating false terrorist information was to effectively suppress rampant terrorist crimes, but now with the emergence of social diversity, it has deviated from its original course. Towards the direction of regulation of public order. The act of fabricating and deliberately disseminating false terrorist information is particularly apt to cause panic among the crowd, make people's psychology uneasy, and make the social stability and order become particularly chaotic. Even seriously endangers the citizen's property ownership and personal safety. Through the analysis of a series of cases, this article makes a deep reflection on the relevant legal issues in order to make the crime of fabricating and deliberately disseminating false terrorist information play a better role in the criminal law. This article mainly through the case analysis method, the empirical analysis method, the comparative analysis method and so on a series of research methods mainly from the following four aspects to fabricate, This paper analyzes the constitution of the crime of intentionally disseminating false terrorist information: firstly, by analyzing some focal issues in the SMS case of "bombing Shanghai Pudong Airport tomorrow" made up by Wang Wenze, the author analyzes what is "fabrication" and what is it. "intentional communication" for identification, The subjective aspect of the crime is clarified. Secondly, through the analysis of some focal issues in Lin Xiaoyan case, the author analyzes what is "false" information and what is "terror" information, and then expounds the identification of false terrorist information in detail. Then, through the case of Li Zongmin, we should explain what kind of behavior constitutes "serious disturbance of social order" and to what extent it can be called "serious". In the end, Feng Yupeng's case of fabricating false terrorist information to extort money and money shows the degree of "causing serious consequences", mainly through the case analysis to clarify what kind of consequences are serious consequences. Through the analysis of several typical cases mentioned above, the conditions of the crime of intentionally spreading false terrorist information and the application of conviction and sentencing will become clearer.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李博宇;和諧社會須以理性為基[J];人民公安;2005年09期

2 李洪川;論投放虛假危險物質(zhì)罪[J];法律適用;2003年10期

3 李鈞德;上訪該不該被判刑 河南省唐河縣五名上訪村民被判刑的調(diào)查[J];w

本文編號：1936752