本文選題：遺棄罪 + 遺棄行為�。� 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，隨著我國(guó)現(xiàn)代社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)和科技的飛速發(fā)展，必要的危險(xiǎn)行為越來(lái)越多，個(gè)人陷于危難境地而無(wú)法自救的可能性逐漸增強(qiáng)。而我國(guó)刑法學(xué)界傳統(tǒng)理論對(duì)于遺棄行為的理解沿襲了中國(guó)刑法的傳統(tǒng)，認(rèn)為遺棄行為是妨害婚姻家庭的犯罪行為，遺棄行為的主體只能是與被害人屬于同一家庭的成員。現(xiàn)行刑法的有關(guān)遺棄行為的理論包容量小、張力不足，使得刑法對(duì)于遺棄行為的規(guī)制作用難以發(fā)揮，導(dǎo)致使一些遺棄行為在審判時(shí)陷入兩難的困境，這樣既違背了公民的法情感，，也使得刑法保護(hù)合法權(quán)益、維護(hù)社會(huì)倫理秩序的價(jià)值無(wú)法得到應(yīng)有的體現(xiàn)，新型的具有嚴(yán)重社會(huì)危害性的遺棄行為的不斷出現(xiàn)對(duì)我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)刑法理論通說(shuō)提出了挑戰(zhàn)。 本文試圖通過(guò)分析我國(guó)刑法關(guān)于遺棄行為的歷史沿革、通過(guò)比較我國(guó)與其他國(guó)家刑法關(guān)于遺棄行為的不同規(guī)定，反思我國(guó)現(xiàn)行刑法的不足。在借鑒國(guó)外有關(guān)刑事立法和刑法理論合理之處的基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合我國(guó)特有的基本國(guó)情，對(duì)我國(guó)刑法中的遺棄行為進(jìn)行重新詮釋，提出了應(yīng)當(dāng)突破遺棄行為僅限定于家庭成員的束縛，將其認(rèn)定為侵犯無(wú)獨(dú)立生存能力者的生命、健康權(quán)利的行為，并就遺棄罪與相關(guān)犯罪的區(qū)別進(jìn)行了探討，以期對(duì)準(zhǔn)確認(rèn)定遺棄罪中的遺棄行為，強(qiáng)化刑法維護(hù)公民人身權(quán)利、民主權(quán)利的功能有所裨益。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of modern social economy and science and technology in our country, more and more dangerous acts are necessary, and the possibility of self rescue is gradually increased by individuals. The traditional theory of criminal law in our country follows the tradition of Chinese criminal law in the understanding of the abandonment behavior, and thinks the abandonment behavior is an offense to the marriage and family. The main body of the act of sin and abandonment can only be a member of the same family with the victim. The theory of abandonment of the current criminal law has small capacity and insufficient tension, which makes it difficult to play the role of the criminal law on the abandonment behavior, causing some abandonment behavior to fall into a dilemma in the trial, so that it violates the law of citizens. Emotion also makes the criminal law protect the legal rights and interests, and the value of maintaining the social ethical order can not be reflected. The continuous emergence of the new and serious social harmfulness of abandonment has challenged the traditional theory of criminal law in China.
By analyzing the historical evolution of the abandonment behavior in our country's criminal law and comparing the different provisions of the criminal law of our country and other countries on the different provisions of the abandonment, this article rethinks the shortcomings of the current criminal law in our country. On the basis of the foreign relevant criminal legislation and the rationalization of the criminal law theory, and combining our country's unique national conditions, the criminal law of our country is made. The behavior of abandonment is reinterpreted, and it is proposed that the abandonment should be restricted to the family members only, which is regarded as the behavior of violating the life of the non independent survivability, the right to health, and the difference between the abandonment crime and the related crime, in order to accurately identify the abandonment behavior in the crime of abandonment and strengthen the criminal law. The function of democratic rights is beneficial to safeguarding citizens' personal rights.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 蘇彩霞;遺棄罪之新詮釋[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

2 陳興良;非家庭成員間遺棄行為之定性研究——王益民等遺棄案之分析[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年04期

3 高仕銀;;虐待罪及其處遇——基于和諧社會(huì)語(yǔ)境下的思考[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2008年06期

4 錢葉六;胡嘉金;;德日刑法中的遺棄犯罪及對(duì)我國(guó)刑法的啟示——從一則案例談起[J];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

5 李立眾;;事實(shí)婚姻中的遺棄行為能否認(rèn)定遺棄罪[J];人民檢察;2008年01期

6 周光權(quán);;論實(shí)質(zhì)的作為義務(wù)[J];中外法學(xué);2005年02期

本文編號(hào)：1929849