本文選題：借貸糾紛 + 詐騙罪　； 參考：《沈陽師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：從幾年前的“許霆案”到最近廣受爭議的“吳英案”，人們對這兩起案件到底應該歸民事相關法調(diào)整還是刑事相關法調(diào)整產(chǎn)生了很大的爭議。隨著社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，人民生活水平的提高，人的社會行為變得越來越復雜多樣，造成司法實踐中法律認定的困難，產(chǎn)生很多疑難問題。對于此類復雜的案件如何界定其案件性質(zhì)是近來學界討論的熱點。 民間借貸是我們身邊很常見很普通的一種民事法律行為，它與以借貸為名義的詐騙犯罪在表現(xiàn)上有很多相似的地方，如何區(qū)分一個案件到底屬于民間借貸糾紛還是詐騙犯罪，是司法實踐的一個難題，，也關系到涉案當事人的合法權(quán)益的保護問題和司法公正問題，正確區(qū)分這兩者顯得意義非凡，筆者提出一些在司法實踐中應當注意的問題，希望法律真真正正的成為公民的保護傘。 筆者查閱了一些法院審判的案件，選取了本文這個比較典型的案例，通過案例，并結(jié)合其他學者的一些著述，運用案例分析、文獻分析、比較分析等方法，探究民間借貸與詐騙罪的界定問題，并對案例進行了一些發(fā)散思考，提出借貸案件在司法實踐中要防止犯罪化、重刑化，司法實踐中非法占有目的認定時應注意的問題，以及《刑法》需要增加一些不需要“非法占有目的”的犯罪來調(diào)整新出現(xiàn)的一些情況。
[Abstract]:From the case of Xu Ting a few years ago to the recently controversial case of Wu Ying, there has been a great controversy as to whether the two cases should belong to the adjustment of civil related law or criminal related law. With the development of social economy and the improvement of people's living standard, people's social behavior becomes more and more complex and diverse, resulting in the difficulty of legal recognition in judicial practice and many difficult problems. How to define the nature of such complicated cases is a hot topic in recent academic circles. Folk lending is a very common civil legal act around us. It has many similarities with the crime of fraud in the name of borrowing. How to distinguish whether a case belongs to a private loan dispute or a fraud crime? It is a difficult problem in judicial practice, and it is also related to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved in the case and the issue of judicial justice. It is of great significance to correctly distinguish these two issues. The author puts forward some problems that should be paid attention to in the judicial practice. I hope that the law will truly become an umbrella for citizens. The author consulted some court cases, selected this relatively typical case, through the case, and combined with some other scholars' writings, using case analysis, literature analysis, comparative analysis and other methods. This paper probes into the definition of the crime of folk borrowing and fraud, and makes some divergent reflections on the case, and puts forward some problems that should be paid attention to when the purpose of illegal possession is determined in the judicial practice, such as preventing the crime and heavy punishment in the judicial practice. And the Criminal Law needs to add some crimes that do not require the purpose of illegal possession to adjust some new situations.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D923;D924.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 牟憲魁;;說明義務違反與沉默的民事詐欺構(gòu)成——以“信息上的弱者”之保護為中心[J];法律科學(西北政法學院學報);2007年04期

2 張明楷;論刑法的謙抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1995年04期

3 代匯賓;;民間借貸的犯罪性異化及法律規(guī)范[J];法制與社會;2012年27期

4 吳家林;常曉紅;;借貸糾紛型犯罪的司法實務[J];中國檢察官;2012年20期

5 葉名怡;;涉合同詐騙的民法規(guī)制[J];中國法學;2012年01期

6 蘇虎超;;民間借貸活動與金融犯罪相關問題探析[J];中國刑事法雜志;2011年06期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 劉鑫;論民間融資的刑法規(guī)制[D];華東政法大學;2012年

2 萬選才;刑法謙抑的司法實現(xiàn)[D];武漢大學;2012年

本文編號：1876568