本文選題：侵犯財產(chǎn)罪 + 罰金刑��； 參考：《遼寧大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國社會主義市場經(jīng)濟體制的逐步確立，人民群眾物質(zhì)文化生活中面對的物質(zhì)誘惑越來越多，貪利性質(zhì)的犯罪，尤其是侵犯財產(chǎn)類犯罪便不斷地涌現(xiàn)出來，，為有效遏制這類犯罪，理論界和實務界從來沒有停止過對有效的刑罰措施進行探索的腳步。罰金刑作為一種剝奪犯罪人一定數(shù)額金錢的刑罰方法，在懲治和預防侵犯財產(chǎn)罪這類貪利性質(zhì)的犯罪方面具有其他刑罰所無法比擬的優(yōu)勢，能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)“罰當其罪”的刑罰效果，也受到了世界各國的青睞，而且還順應了刑罰輕緩化的國際趨勢。因此，罰金刑的適用范圍在我國1997年頒布的新刑法以及后來的幾個刑法修正案中都陸續(xù)地被加以擴大，體現(xiàn)了對罰金刑的重視。罰金刑適用范圍的擴大必然帶來其適用率的提高，本應有利于實現(xiàn)打擊和預防侵犯財產(chǎn)犯罪的效果，然而，司法實踐中罰金刑的適用卻往往阻力重重，適用時具體制度也常常捉襟見肘，致使罰金刑的刑罰目的大打折扣。這里面除了有適用過程中的具體原因外，追根溯源還是由于立法的缺陷與不足造成的，先天的不足必然會帶來后天的畸形。司法實踐中，罰金刑的適用呈現(xiàn)出來的問題不斷地暴露出我國罰金刑在立法上的缺陷與不成熟。因此，為有效遏制日益高發(fā)的侵犯財產(chǎn)罪，充分發(fā)揮罰金刑應有的刑罰價值和刑罰目的，有必要在分析目前我國侵犯財產(chǎn)罪罰金刑立法現(xiàn)狀的基礎上，進一步分析罰金刑在立法上的缺陷，并在借鑒國外成熟立法經(jīng)驗的基礎上提出完善我國罰金刑立法的具體建議。論文主要從四個部分對侵犯財產(chǎn)罪罰金刑的立法缺陷及其完善進行了論述： 第一部分是對目前我國侵犯財產(chǎn)罪罰金刑立法現(xiàn)狀的詳細歸納介紹，具體包括罰金刑在侵犯財產(chǎn)罪中的適用范圍、適用方式、數(shù)額立法、裁量原則以及執(zhí)行制度，以期對我國侵犯財產(chǎn)罪罰金刑的立法現(xiàn)狀有一個全面直觀地把握。 第二部分筆者通過對司法實踐中侵犯財產(chǎn)罪罰金刑在適用中呈現(xiàn)出的問題的總結(jié)，深入挖掘出侵犯財產(chǎn)罪罰金刑在立法上的種種缺陷，具體包括：侵財犯罪中有的罪名規(guī)定了罰金刑，而有的罪名卻沒有規(guī)定罰金刑，這樣的適用范圍缺乏合理性依據(jù)；侵犯財產(chǎn)罪中必并罰金制的大范圍規(guī)定使得罰金刑的適用方式過于僵化；無限額罰金制的規(guī)定使罰金刑的數(shù)額裁量缺乏可操作性，增加了判決的隨意性；另外，罰金刑的裁量原則也規(guī)定得過于粗疏，現(xiàn)實可操作性不強；現(xiàn)有的罰金刑執(zhí)行制度不能滿足執(zhí)行工作的需要，在具體執(zhí)行工作中難以奏效。 第三部分主要是對域外成熟的罰金刑立法的介紹，以期為我國侵犯財產(chǎn)罪罰金刑立法制度的發(fā)展完善提供有效借鑒。 第四部分筆者在借鑒第三部分相關國家成熟立法制度的基礎上提出了完善我國侵犯財產(chǎn)罪罰金刑立法的具體構(gòu)想：從整個罰金刑制度來說，提升罰金刑的刑罰地位，將其上升為主刑；在適用范圍方面，有必要在侵犯財產(chǎn)罪的其他罪名中配置罰金刑；在適用方式方面，應當限制侵犯財產(chǎn)罪中必并罰金制的規(guī)定，適當擴大選科罰金與得并罰金制的規(guī)定；在數(shù)額裁量方面，提出限額罰金制、倍比罰金制以及日額罰金制的引入；在具體的執(zhí)行立法方面，建議在立法中進一步明確罰金刑的執(zhí)行主體、異地委托執(zhí)行、罰金刑執(zhí)行監(jiān)督以及財產(chǎn)調(diào)查與財產(chǎn)保全的相關規(guī)定，并在立足我國國情的基礎上提出罰金刑易科制度、罰金刑緩刑制度等有效的罰金刑執(zhí)行保障制度的探索，以促進我國的罰金刑制度不斷趨于完善，為有效遏制和預防侵犯財產(chǎn)罪提供保障。
[Abstract]:With the gradual establishment of the socialist market economic system in China, more and more material seduction is faced in the material and cultural life of the people. The crime of greedy property, especially the crime of property infringement, is constantly emerging. In order to effectively curb this kind of crime, the theorists and the real world have never stopped the effective penalty measures. As a penalty method to deprive the criminal of a certain amount of money, it has the advantages incomparable to other penalties in punishing and preventing the crime of invavant property, which can achieve the penalty effect of "punishment as a crime", and is also favored by all countries in the world, and also conforms to the punishment. Therefore, the scope of the application of fine penalty has been expanded in succession in the new criminal law issued in 1997 in China and in several subsequent amendments to the criminal law, which embodies the importance of the penalty. The expansion of the scope of the penalty application will inevitably bring the higher application rate, which should be beneficial to the realization of the attack and the prevention of infringement. The effect of property crime, however, the application of fine penalty in judicial practice is often resisted, and the specific system is often overstretched when the application is applied, which causes the penalty to be discounted. In addition to the specific reasons in the application process, it is caused by the defects and deficiencies of the legislation. In judicial practice, the problem of the application of fine penalty in judicial practice constantly exposes the defects and immaturity of China's fine penalty in legislation. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the current violation of the penalty value and the purpose of punishment in order to effectively contain the increasing crime of property infringement and to give full play to the penalty value and the purpose of the penalty. On the basis of the present situation of the legislation of the fine penalty of property crime, this paper further analyzes the defects of the fine penalty in legislation, and puts forward some specific suggestions on perfecting the legislation of fine penalty in China on the basis of foreign mature legislative experience. The thesis mainly discusses the legislative defects and perfection of the fine punishment of the crime of property infringement in four parts.
The first part is a detailed introduction to the present situation of the legislation on the fine punishment of the crime of property infringement in China, including the scope of the application of the penalty in the crime of property infringement, the way of application, the amount of legislation, the principle of discretion and the implementation system, in order to have a comprehensive and intuitive grasp of the legislative status of the fine penalty for the crime of property infringement in our country.
In the second part, through the summary of the problems presented in the application of the fine punishment of the crime of property infringement in the judicial practice, the author deeply excavates all kinds of defects in the legislation of the fine penalty of the crime of property infringement, including: some of the offences in the crime of invading money have stipulated the fine penalty, while some crimes have not stipulated the fine penalty, so the scope of application is short. There is a lack of reasonableness basis; the large scope of the compulsory penalty system in the crime of property infringement makes the applicable way of fine penalty too rigid; the provisions of unlimited fine system make the amount of the penalty amount lack operability and increase the arbitrariness of the judgment; in addition, the principle of penalty discretion is too rough and practical, and the practical operability is not good. Strong; the existing fine punishment execution system can not meet the needs of implementation, and is difficult to achieve in specific implementation.
The third part is mainly about the introduction of the fine penalty legislation abroad, in order to provide an effective reference for the development and improvement of the system of fine penalty in China.
In the fourth part, on the basis of the third parts of the relevant country's mature legislation system, the author puts forward the concrete conception of perfecting the legislation of the fine punishment of the crime of property infringement in our country: to improve the penalty status of the fine penalty from the whole fine penalty system and raise it to the main punishment; in the scope of application, it is necessary to violate the other crimes of the property crime. In the way of application, in the way of application, we should limit the stipulation of the compulsory and fine system in the crime of property infringement, and appropriately expand the provisions of the fine and the penal system, and put forward the quota and penalty system, the system of more than the fine and the system of the daily penalty in the amount of discretion; in the specific enforcement legislation, it is suggested that the legislation should be entered into the legislation. One step is to clarify the subject of the execution of the penalty, the execution of the special commission, the execution of the fine penalty and the relevant provisions of the property investigation and property preservation, and on the basis of the national conditions of our country, we put forward the exploration of the effective penalty system, such as the fine penalty system, the penalty probation system and so on, in order to promote the continuous fine penalty system in our country. It tends to be perfect, so as to provide guarantee for effectively preventing and preventing crimes of infringing property.

【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.35

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李潔;;罰金刑應上升為主刑論[J];當代法學;1989年03期

2 由明言;再社會化——德國刑法的追求[J];當代法學;2003年12期

3 鮮鐵可;論我國刑法中罰金刑的立法完善[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1995年06期

4 鄧文莉;;罰金刑的地位及配置范圍之探討[J];法學雜志;2008年05期

5 陳璇;;罰金刑易科制度探析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬刊);2009年10期

6 蔡雅奇;;我國現(xiàn)行罰金刑的缺陷及其完善略論[J];法制與社會;2007年12期

7 劉建燁;李濯清;;淺析罰金易科[J];公民與法(法學版);2012年04期

8 劉世友;;從現(xiàn)實邁向理想——罰金刑執(zhí)行完善路徑之探尋[J];法律適用;2013年01期

9 李潔;罰金刑適用若干問題研究[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2000年05期

10 李潔;罰金刑之數(shù)額規(guī)定研究[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2002年01期

本文編號：1869970