本文選題：法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤 + 故意�。� 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：儲(chǔ)槐植教授說過，法定犯時(shí)代的到來(lái)要求我們必須加強(qiáng)對(duì)法定犯的理論研究。在法定犯的司法實(shí)踐中客觀地面臨著一個(gè)多發(fā)的現(xiàn)象——法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤。關(guān)于違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤，當(dāng)前的理論界主要是從廣義的角度出發(fā)，，并沒有著重的關(guān)注法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤。但是法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤應(yīng)當(dāng)有其自身獨(dú)特的價(jià)值。本著提出問題、分析問題和解決問題的邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)，本文的主體內(nèi)容主要有三個(gè)章節(jié)，各部分具體內(nèi)容如下： 第一章即是提出問題。通過兩個(gè)案例，說明法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤在當(dāng)前我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中的處理情況。通過案例我們可以明顯看出，當(dāng)前我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐對(duì)于違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤的處理存在明顯的不合理性。接下來(lái)是對(duì)法定犯的內(nèi)涵與外延進(jìn)行了界定。因?yàn)橛芯糠ǘǚ高`法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤，必須首先確定研究對(duì)象的范圍——法定犯的范圍。法定犯的界定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)當(dāng)是雙重違法性和較弱的道德違反性。隨后，通過違法性認(rèn)識(shí)基本理論的闡述得出了法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤的概念和分類，并對(duì)法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤當(dāng)前國(guó)內(nèi)外處理原則的變化進(jìn)行了一個(gè)綜述。 第二章即是分析問題。本章是本文的重點(diǎn)，通過違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤、刑事責(zé)任和量刑的相關(guān)基本理論，對(duì)法定犯的違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤的定位進(jìn)行了分析。本章內(nèi)容共有三部分，第一部分筆者從違法性認(rèn)識(shí)與故意的關(guān)系，分析了法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤的定罪定位，進(jìn)而得出法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤不阻卻故意的成立；第二部分以刑事責(zé)任承擔(dān)的根據(jù)出發(fā)，對(duì)法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤減免刑事責(zé)任的當(dāng)然性進(jìn)行了分析；第三部分在前述兩個(gè)部分研究的基礎(chǔ)上，結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中量刑的考量因素，得出法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤在行為人承擔(dān)刑事責(zé)任的前提下可以從輕、減輕或者免除處罰。 第三章即是解決問題。本章的內(nèi)容旨在解決我國(guó)刑事法治視野下，法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤在立法與司法中的應(yīng)然選擇。首先，通過我國(guó)刑事責(zé)任理論的分析，得出違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤可以單獨(dú)地放在責(zé)任要素中考察。這樣就解決了違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤“水土不服”的問題。其次，為司法實(shí)踐中認(rèn)定法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤提出了標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和方法，即堅(jiān)持主客觀相一致的原則，結(jié)合“普通人的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”和“行為人的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。”再次，通過為法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤減免刑事責(zé)任作出限制，進(jìn)而提出不可避免的違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤可以免除刑事責(zé)任，而可以避免的違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤只可以減輕刑事責(zé)任。最后，經(jīng)過對(duì)比國(guó)外立法體例和國(guó)內(nèi)的法律草稿，得出可以在刑法總則的第五章“其他規(guī)定”中設(shè)置法定犯違法性認(rèn)識(shí)錯(cuò)誤減輕或免除刑事責(zé)任的相關(guān)條款。
[Abstract]:Professor Chu Huai-Zhi said that the coming of the era of statutory offense requires us to strengthen the theoretical study of statutory offense. In the judicial practice of legal offense, there is an objective phenomenon of illegal cognition. The current theoretical circle mainly starts from the broad sense, and does not pay attention to the illegal cognition error of the legal offense. However, the legal offense of illegality should have its own unique value. In line with the logical structure of problem raising, problem analysis and problem solving, the main body of this paper has three chapters, and the specific contents of each part are as follows: The first chapter is to ask questions. Through two cases, this paper explains how to deal with the illegal cognitive errors in the current judicial practice of our country. Through the case we can clearly see that there is obvious irrationality in the current judicial practice of our country to deal with illegitimate cognitive errors. Then it defines the connotation and extension of legal offense. Because in order to study the illegality of legal offense, we must first determine the scope of the object of study-the scope of statutory offense. The definition standard of statutory offense should be double illegality and weak moral violation. Then, through the elaboration of the basic theory of illegality cognition, the concept and classification of illegal cognitive errors of statutory crimes are obtained, and the changes of the current domestic and foreign treatment principles of illegal cognitive errors of statutory offenders are summarized. The second chapter is the analysis of the problem. This chapter is the focus of this paper, through the related basic theories of illegality, criminal responsibility and sentencing, the author analyzes the orientation of illegal cognitive errors of statutory offenders. There are three parts in this chapter. The first part of the author from the relationship between illegal understanding and intentional analysis of the legal illegal understanding of the position of conviction, and then came to the conclusion that the legal illegal understanding of the wrong unhindered but intentionally established; In the second part, based on the basis of criminal responsibility, the author analyzes the nature of criminal responsibility reduction and exemption from the legal illegality. The third part is based on the above two parts of the study, combined with the judicial practice of sentencing considerations, It is concluded that the legal offense of illegality can be mitigated or exempted from punishment under the premise of the criminal responsibility of the perpetrator. The third chapter is to solve the problem. The purpose of this chapter is to solve the problem of illegal cognition in legislation and judicature. First of all, through the analysis of the theory of criminal responsibility in our country, it is concluded that the mistakes of illegality can be investigated separately in the elements of responsibility. In this way, we have solved the problem of illegal cognition. Secondly, the author puts forward the standards and methods for recognizing the illegality in judicial practice, that is, adhering to the principle of consistent subjectivity and objectivity, combining "the standard of ordinary people" and "the standard of actor". Thirdly, by limiting the criminal responsibility for the illegal cognitive error of the legal offense, and then proposing that the unavoidable illegality cognitive error can avoid the criminal responsibility, the avoidable illegality cognitive error can only alleviate the criminal responsibility. Finally, by comparing the legislative style of foreign countries and the draft of domestic laws, it is concluded that we can set up the relevant provisions in Chapter V of the General principles of Criminal Law "other provisions" to reduce or exempt the criminal responsibility from the illegality of legal offenders.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 羅明華;;論影響刑罰輕重立法設(shè)置的因素[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

2 陳增旺;;淺談法定犯的違法性認(rèn)識(shí)[J];蚌埠黨校學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

3 童偉華,李�；�;違法性認(rèn)識(shí)在故意犯罪成立中的地位[J];石油大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

本文編號(hào)：1866762