本文選題：撬門(mén) + 出租�。� 參考：《首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)發(fā)展，以往我們認(rèn)知的簡(jiǎn)單侵犯財(cái)產(chǎn)類犯罪，由于犯罪分子的手段、犯罪形式的變化出現(xiàn)了更多復(fù)雜的情況。司法實(shí)踐中，，在認(rèn)定某行為時(shí)，常常遇到涉及多個(gè)罪名相互交織的復(fù)雜問(wèn)題，如何定罪就成了關(guān)鍵問(wèn)題。本文選取一個(gè)撬門(mén)出租他人房屋的案例，通過(guò)分析案件中行為人的行為及學(xué)者之間不同觀點(diǎn)的分歧，結(jié)合法律基本理論對(duì)本案涉及的法律問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析。文章先是介紹了本案的實(shí)際發(fā)生經(jīng)過(guò)，然后將其中所涉及的有爭(zhēng)議的法律問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了一一羅列，然后將行為人的行為與不當(dāng)?shù)美o(wú)權(quán)代理、盜竊、詐騙等行為做了逐一對(duì)比，發(fā)現(xiàn)行為人的行為按照現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)定而言，與任何一個(gè)具體罪名或者制度的構(gòu)成要件都不相符合。因此，就該案而言，實(shí)踐中該如何定罪也就成了一個(gè)比較棘手的問(wèn)題。本文經(jīng)過(guò)論述，結(jié)合目前我國(guó)的司法現(xiàn)狀，大膽地提出了將行為人按照罪刑法定原則做無(wú)罪處理，以犧牲個(gè)案的方式來(lái)?yè)Q取立法的進(jìn)步，希望該設(shè)想能夠?yàn)槔碚撗芯刻峁┮稽c(diǎn)可借鑒的素材。
[Abstract]:With the development of society, the simple crime of infringing on property that we used to know, because of the means of the criminal, the change of the crime form has appeared more and more complicated situation. In judicial practice, when determining a certain behavior, it is often met with complex problems involving multiple crimes, and how to convict becomes a key problem. This paper selects a case of prying doors to rent out other people's houses, and analyzes the legal problems involved in this case by analyzing the behavior of the perpetrators and the differences of views among scholars, and combining with the basic theory of law. The article first introduces the actual occurrence of this case, then lists the controversial legal issues involved in it, and then compares the behavior of the perpetrator with improper enrichment, unauthorized agency, theft, fraud and so on. It is found that the behavior of the perpetrator does not accord with any specific charge or system according to the existing law. Therefore, in this case, the practice of how to convict has become a more difficult problem. This paper discusses, combining with the current judicial situation in our country, boldly proposes to treat the perpetrator innocent according to the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime, and to sacrifice the individual case in exchange for the progress of legislation. It is hoped that this idea can provide some reference materials for theoretical research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 牛忠志;牛穎穎;;民事違法與犯罪界分之我見(jiàn)[J];重慶文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年06期

2 張光宇;;刑民界說(shuō)的價(jià)值分析[J];福建警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

3 常國(guó)麗;;論不當(dāng)?shù)美闹贫裙δ躘J];法制與社會(huì);2011年33期

4 張慧聰;;淺析非法侵入住宅罪[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年17期

5 陳霽月;;試論不當(dāng)?shù)美袄妗盵J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年06期

6 樊冰;;淺談非法侵入住宅罪[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年06期

7 楊柳;;論虛擬財(cái)產(chǎn)的刑法保護(hù)[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年03期

8 康凱麗;陳

本文編號(hào)：1859823