發(fā)布時間：2018-05-04 21:29

  本文選題：減刑 + 假釋��； 參考：《遼寧大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：減刑制度作為我國刑罰執(zhí)行制度中的重要內(nèi)容,在教育改造罪犯的司法實踐中發(fā)揮了重要的作用,也是我國在改造罪犯過程中的一項獨特的行刑制度。但是,不可否認的是,我國的減刑制度在立法設(shè)計上存在一些缺陷,在司法適用中也暴露出各種問題。這些缺陷和問題嚴重阻礙了減刑制度功能的發(fā)揮和刑罰目的的實現(xiàn)。本文試圖從立法和實踐兩方面考察減刑制度中存在的問題,并針對發(fā)現(xiàn)的問題提出完善的對策,力圖使我國的減刑制度能夠日趨完善合理,適應(yīng)現(xiàn)代社會行刑的目的和要求。文章共四個部分,第一章介紹了我國減刑制度的理論現(xiàn)狀,有學者對減刑制度的存在提出質(zhì)疑,主張廢除減刑制度,筆者認為減刑制度的存在和廣泛適用有其合理性,擴大假釋不意味著要廢除減刑,現(xiàn)階段我國保留減刑制度是國情需要。第二章對我國減刑制度的立法現(xiàn)狀進行考察,指出我國減刑立法中存在著減刑條件規(guī)定不合理、適用刑罰規(guī)定不全面、減刑幅度和間隔時間設(shè)置過寬、撤銷制度規(guī)定不完善、監(jiān)獄徒刑方式和考核方法機械化等問題。第三章通過對遼寧省、北京市、上海市、青海省、廣西省五個省份的減刑案件進行實證研究,總結(jié)出我國法院審理減刑案件的特點和規(guī)律,并根據(jù)數(shù)據(jù)分析情況指出我國減刑制度在適用中存在著審查過程偏行政化、監(jiān)督程序形同虛設(shè)、缺乏對減刑幅度合理性審查、超幅度減刑情況嚴重等問題。第四章在前幾章的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國國情現(xiàn)狀,對完善減刑制度提出建議,認為在立法和制度設(shè)計上我國應(yīng)建立假釋為主、減刑為輔的行刑制度,可以在部分地區(qū)開展自動減刑制度試點工作,修改現(xiàn)有減刑條件,增加附加刑適用減刑的規(guī)定,等等,在司法上應(yīng)加強監(jiān)督,規(guī)范刑罰執(zhí)行機關(guān)和法院的執(zhí)法行為。
[Abstract]:The commutation system, as an important part of our country's penalty enforcement system, plays an important role in the judicial practice of educating and reforming criminals, and it is also a unique execution system in the process of reforming criminals. However, it is undeniable that there are some defects in the legislative design of the commutation system in our country, and various problems are exposed in the judicial application. These defects and problems seriously hinder the function of commutation system and the realization of penalty purpose. This paper attempts to investigate the problems existing in the commutation system from the aspects of legislation and practice, and puts forward some perfect countermeasures to solve the problems found, in order to make the commutation system in our country more and more perfect and reasonable, and adapt to the purpose and requirements of the execution of punishment in modern society. The first chapter introduces the current situation of the commutation system in China. Some scholars question the existence of commutation system and advocate the abolition of commutation system. The author thinks that the existence and wide application of commutation system has its rationality. Expanding parole does not mean abolishing commutation. At present, it is necessary for our country to retain commutation system. The second chapter investigates the current situation of the commutation system in our country, and points out that the provisions of commutation conditions are unreasonable, the applicable penalty provisions are not comprehensive, the range and interval of commutation are too wide, and the provisions of revocation system are not perfect. Prison imprisonment method and assessment method mechanization and so on. The third chapter through the empirical study on the commutation cases in five provinces of Liaoning, Beijing, Shanghai, Qinghai and Guangxi, summarizes the characteristics and rules of trial of commutation cases by Chinese courts. According to the analysis of data, it is pointed out that there are some problems in the application of the commutation system in our country, such as the partial administration of the examination process, the virtual supervision procedure, the lack of reasonable examination of the range of commutation, the serious situation of the reduction of the penalty beyond the margin, and so on. The fourth chapter is based on the previous chapters, combined with the current situation of our country, put forward some suggestions to improve the commutation system, think that in legislation and system design, we should establish the execution system of parole, supplemented by commutation. We can carry out the pilot work of automatic commutation system in some regions, modify the existing commutation conditions, increase the provisions of applying commutation to additional punishment, and so on. We should strengthen supervision in judicature and standardize the law enforcement actions of penalty enforcement organs and courts.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D924.13

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 宋盈;;試論罰金刑減刑制度之構(gòu)建[J];東南大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年S1期

2 杜菊;我國假釋制度運作態(tài)勢的反思與探討[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學院學報;2003年02期

3 尚愛國;;我國普通減刑制度存在的弊端及其改革[J];人民檢察;2011年16期

4 王瑞君;;賠償與刑罰關(guān)系研究[J];山東大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2011年03期

5 唐健;程世國;;限制減刑應(yīng)適用于剝奪政治權(quán)利終身[J];人民檢察;2013年05期

，

本文編號：1844709