本文選題：危害原則 + 自主權��； 參考：《環(huán)球法律評論》2017年01期

【摘要】：危害原則是為英美法系刑法懲罰提供正當根據(jù)的核心原則,也是英美法系刑法的最低道德底線。危害原則把不法侵害他人利益作為刑法懲罰的起點,包括限制國家刑罰權和限制個人濫用自由兩個維度。其顯性的法哲學意義是通過限制刑罰權而保護個人自由,其隱性的法哲學意義是通過保護個人自主權,從而保護與促進人之尊嚴與發(fā)展。在走向權利、弘揚人格尊嚴和自由的21世紀語境下進行的中國刑法立法,呈現(xiàn)出明顯的犯罪化趨勢。大批預防型犯罪的產(chǎn)生和為維護社會管理秩序而不斷擴張的刑事法網(wǎng),均彰顯出中國刑法立法的價值取向側重于秩序保護。維護社會秩序并不必然意味著刑法的不公正,但維護秩序必須堅守刑法的道德底線。危害原則不僅是刑法應遵守的道德底線,而且其隱性和顯性法哲學精神也與當代中國的治國理念,以及21世紀的民主法治精神契合。因此,其對中國刑法的犯罪化趨勢具有重要的警示意義。
[Abstract]:Harm principle is the core principle that provides the proper basis for the punishment of Anglo-American legal system, and it is also the lowest moral bottom line of Anglo-American legal system. The principle of harmfulness regards illegal infringement of others' interests as the starting point of criminal punishment, which includes two dimensions: restricting the state's criminal penalty right and restricting the individual's abusing freedom. Its explicit legal philosophical significance is to protect individual freedom by restricting the right to penalty, and its implicit legal philosophical meaning is to protect and promote human dignity and development by protecting individual autonomy. The legislation of Chinese criminal law in the context of right, human dignity and freedom in the 21st century shows an obvious trend of criminalization. The emergence of a large number of preventive crimes and the continuous expansion of the criminal law network in order to maintain the order of social management all show that the value orientation of Chinese criminal law legislation is focused on the protection of order. Maintaining social order does not necessarily mean the injustice of criminal law, but maintaining order must adhere to the moral bottom line of criminal law. The principle of harm is not only the moral bottom line that criminal law should abide by, but also the spirit of recessive and explicit philosophy of law in line with the idea of governing the country in contemporary China and the spirit of democracy and rule by law in the 21st century. Therefore, it has important warning significance to the trend of criminal law in China.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學外國及比較刑法研究中心;
【基金】：2016年司法部課題“中國刑法修正案中的犯罪化研究”(16SFB2018)的研究成果
【分類號】：D90;D924

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 徐楷;宋敏;;俄羅斯刑法惡意欠薪罪解構與借鑒[J];山東省青年管理干部學院學報;2009年02期

2 鄭牧民,黃征,鄧曄;壟斷罪分析與立法建議[J];湘潭大學社會科學學報;2002年S1期

3 胡啟蓉;關于安樂死的犯罪化與非犯罪化的討論[J];廣西警官高等�？茖W校學報;2005年03期

4 黎宏;;日本近年來的刑事實體立法動向及其評價[J];中國刑事法雜志;2006年06期

5 蔣淑波;;安全法學的超前性與“違犯法令禁止的危險行為”的提出[J];經(jīng)濟研究導刊;2007年03期

6 ;[J];;年期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 瞿僖;論見危不助的成因及法律規(guī)制[D];湘潭大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1828426