本文選題：遺棄罪 + 保護法益�。� 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：法益,這一概念一般是指法所保護的利益。如何界定犯罪的法益,直接影響對一個行為的定罪量刑。就遺棄罪的保護法益而言,刑法理論界以及司法實踐一直爭議不斷。特別是自1997年刑法將遺棄罪所屬章節(jié)變動以來,我國關(guān)于遺棄罪的保護法益問題的爭議就更為激烈了。另外,隨著社會的不斷發(fā)展,處于社會轉(zhuǎn)型時期的社會問題層出不窮,對遺棄罪的保護法益問題又提出了新的挑戰(zhàn)。例如如何處理司法實踐中頻發(fā)的遺棄非家庭成員之間的行為就是急需解決的問題�；诖�,本文將圍繞遺棄罪的保護法益問題展開論述,在結(jié)合社會現(xiàn)狀以及域外相關(guān)理論學(xué)說的基礎(chǔ)上將我國遺棄罪的保護法益界定為受扶養(yǎng)人的生命健康權(quán),以期望能夠妥善處理司法實踐中的相關(guān)問題。第一部分介紹遺棄罪保護法益問題上的學(xué)說爭議。首先,介紹目前我國刑法理論界關(guān)于遺棄罪保護法益的三種理論爭議,即家庭成員的受扶養(yǎng)權(quán)說、受扶養(yǎng)人的生命健康權(quán)說以及一般扶養(yǎng)權(quán)說之爭;其次,介紹大陸法系國家以及英美法系國家關(guān)于遺棄罪的規(guī)定,以說明域外在遺棄罪保護法益問題上的觀點。最后,通過系統(tǒng)的比較分析,指出對我國遺棄罪保護法益進行重構(gòu)的必要性。第二部分論述我國遺棄罪保護法益變更的必要性。在此部分,本文將主要從三個方面展開論述:首先,刑法體系與價值即法律體系的一致性、刑法的正義價值及法益保護機能均對遺棄罪的法益提出了嚴(yán)峻的挑戰(zhàn);其次,通過窮盡法律解釋的立法修訂說明遺棄罪法益變更的必要性;最后,主要從社會轉(zhuǎn)型中的養(yǎng)老模式、留守兒童教育、家庭事務(wù)、同居方式及旅游方式五個方面的變化來說明遺棄罪保護法益變化的必要性。第三部分主要論述遺棄罪保護法益的變更對其他犯罪構(gòu)成要件所產(chǎn)生的影響。具體來說,將從對遺棄罪的行為主體、客觀方面(主要是對象和行為、特別是對行為人的義務(wù)來源)及主觀方面三方面來論述遺棄罪的保護法益變更所帶來的影響。第四部分基于遺棄罪保護法益變更對其他犯罪構(gòu)成要件的影響及適應(yīng)社會發(fā)展的需要,對遺棄罪的立法重構(gòu)提出建議,以期更好的保護受扶養(yǎng)人的生命健康權(quán)。
[Abstract]:Legal interests, this concept is generally referred to the interests protected by the law. How to define the legal benefits of a crime directly affects the conviction and sentencing of an act. As far as the interests of the protection of abandonment crime are concerned, the criminal law theory and judicial practice have always been controversial. Especially since the criminal law of 1997 changed the section of the crime of abandonment, the dispute on the protection of the crime of abandonment has become more and more fierce in our country. In addition, with the continuous development of society, the social problems in the period of social transformation emerge one after another. For example, how to deal with the frequent abandonment of non-family members in judicial practice is an urgent problem. Based on this, this paper discusses the protection benefits of the abandonment crime, and defines the protection benefits of the abandonment crime as the right to life and health of the dependents on the basis of the current social situation and the relevant theories and theories outside the country. In order to expect to be able to properly handle the relevant issues in judicial practice. The first part introduces the theoretical controversy on the protection of the crime of abandonment. First of all, it introduces three kinds of theoretical disputes about the interests of the protection of the crime of abandonment in the theoretical circle of criminal law of our country at present, that is, the theory of family members' right to dependency, the theory of dependant's right to life and health, and the argument of general right of maintenance; secondly, This paper introduces the provisions on the crime of abandonment in the countries of civil law system and common law system in order to explain the views on the interests of the protection law of the crime of abandonment outside the country. Finally, through systematic comparative analysis, the author points out the necessity of reconstructing the legal benefits of abandonment crime in China. The second part discusses the necessity of the change of the law of abandonment in our country. In this part, this article will mainly discuss from three aspects: first, the consistency between the criminal law system and the legal system, the justice value of the criminal law and the function of legal interest protection all put forward the stern challenge to the legal interest of the crime of abandonment; secondly, Through the legislative revision of exhaustive legal interpretation, it explains the necessity of the legal interest change of the crime of abandonment. Finally, it mainly focuses on the old-age model, education of left-behind children, and family affairs in the process of social transformation. The change of cohabitation and tourism means to explain the necessity of the change of legal benefits of abandonment crime. The third part mainly discusses the influence of the change of the law of abandonment on other elements of crime. Specifically, this paper discusses the influence of the change of the law benefit of the crime of abandonment from three aspects: the subject of the crime of abandonment, the objective aspect (mainly the object and the behavior, especially the source of the obligation to the perpetrator) and the subjective aspect. In the fourth part, based on the influence of the change of interest on other crimes and the need of social development, the fourth part puts forward some suggestions on the legislative reconstruction of the crime of abandonment, in order to better protect the right to life and health of dependents.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙靖;;遺棄罪的司法認(rèn)定及立法完善[J];中國檢察官;2016年24期

2 陳楠;;唐代禮法結(jié)合對當(dāng)代法治思想的影響[J];人民論壇;2014年34期

3 鄒易材;;為何重新解讀遺棄罪犯罪構(gòu)成之實證研究——以轉(zhuǎn)型時期我國社會的發(fā)展為視角[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年02期

4 馬改然;梁云寶;;比較視域下我國遺棄罪刑罰的缺陷及完善[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2013年09期

5 張琪;;論遺棄罪的法益變更對其構(gòu)成要件的影響[J];武漢公安干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年02期

6 馬濤;;論遺棄罪的論爭與完善[J];汕頭大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2013年03期

7 林濱渤;;基于家庭成員間受扶養(yǎng)權(quán)三維度下的遺棄罪法益研究[J];求索;2013年02期

8 Q孟，

本文編號：1821173