本文選題：虐童行為 + 虐待罪　； 參考：《沈陽師范大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近幾年虐童事件頻繁發(fā)生，經(jīng)過媒體一再的曝光，引起社會各界高度關(guān)注，但最后都是以行政處罰和或者民事賠償結(jié)案，顯然這種處罰力度沒有有效地遏制虐童事件的發(fā)生，隨著社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展和社會結(jié)構(gòu)的不斷變化，兒童與社會有了更多的接觸，虐童主體在不斷的擴大，除家庭成員外，還包括教師、保姆、鄰居、繼父母等，這些人是與兒童接觸最多最親密的人，犯罪手段表現(xiàn)的較為隱形，一般都沒有造成嚴重的犯罪結(jié)果，正因為如此，在刑法上找不到一個合適的罪名來定性這些行為，兒童的身心健康一直處于危險邊緣。有些人認為現(xiàn)行刑法中的故意傷害罪、尋釁滋事罪、猥褻兒童罪等罪名可以定性目前的虐童行為，而且虐童行為大多數(shù)沒有造成嚴重的后果，因此，無須在重新評價這些行為。但是筆者認為，對這些沒有造成嚴重后果但是影響惡劣的虐童行為也應(yīng)當用刑法來規(guī)制。 本文通過對三個不同的虐童案例分析罪與非罪，此罪與彼罪，運用比較研究法、語義分析法、邏輯分析法等法學方法，闡述不同主體在不同的環(huán)境實施的虐童行為在刑法上應(yīng)當如何來定性，對這些虐童主體的身份特殊性進行分析歸納，同時，借鑒國外的法律對虐待罪的規(guī)定以及對虐待主體的界定，明確了虐童行為的內(nèi)涵，在此基礎(chǔ)上提出應(yīng)當擴大虐待罪的主體，用虐待罪來定性虐童行為最為合適。虐童行為侵犯的是兒童的身心健康，對兒童身體的摧殘和心理的折磨，剝奪了他們在共同生活中的平等權(quán)利，行為方式表現(xiàn)為一貫地、持續(xù)地，符合虐待罪的行為特征，，而且在國際上，虐待兒童也是個非常嚴重的問題，大多數(shù)國家也將其定性為虐待罪。因此，筆者認為隨著社會的快速發(fā)展，刑法也日漸凸顯其滯后性，目前刑法分則將虐待罪中的“家庭成員”限定在具有血親關(guān)系、婚姻關(guān)系或者收養(yǎng)關(guān)系的人當中，并且要求在一個家庭中生活，概念過于狹窄，不利于對虐待行為的規(guī)制，應(yīng)當擴大虐待罪的主體，來應(yīng)對社會上出現(xiàn)的新情況。
[Abstract]:In recent years, child abuse incidents have occurred frequently, which have been repeatedly exposed by the media, which has aroused great concern from all walks of life in the society. However, in the end, they are all closed with administrative penalties or civil compensation. Obviously, this kind of punishment has not effectively curbed the occurrence of child abuse incidents. With the development of social economy and the constant changes of social structure, children have more contacts with society, and the main body of child abuse is constantly expanding. Besides family members, they also include teachers, nannies, neighbors, stepparents and so on. These people are the closest people who have the most contact with children, and the criminal methods are more invisible and generally do not result in serious criminal results. As a result, there is no suitable criminal law to characterize these acts. Children's physical and mental health has always been at risk. Some people think that the crimes of intentional injury, provocation, child molestation and so on in the current criminal law can be used to characterize the current child abuse, and that most of the child abuse has no serious consequences, therefore, there is no need to re-evaluate these acts. However, the author believes that child abuse, which has no serious consequences, should also be regulated by criminal law. Through the analysis of three different cases of child abuse, such as crime and non-crime, this crime and that crime, this article uses comparative research method, semantic analysis method, logic analysis method and other legal methods. This paper expounds how the child abuse behavior carried out by different subjects in different environments should be qualitatively defined in criminal law, and analyzes and sums up the identity particularity of these child abuse subjects, at the same time, Drawing lessons from the provisions of foreign laws on the crime of abuse and the definition of the subject of abuse, this paper clarifies the connotation of child abuse, and on this basis proposes that the subject of crime of abuse should be expanded, and that it is most appropriate to use the crime of abuse to characterize the act of child abuse. Child abuse violates the physical and mental health of the child, the physical and psychological torture of the child, and deprives them of their equal rights in their common life, in a manner that is consistent, consistent and consistent with the characteristics of the crime of abuse, Internationally, child abuse is also a serious problem, and most countries characterize it as a crime of abuse. Therefore, the author thinks that with the rapid development of the society, the criminal law is becoming more and more laggard. At present, the "family members" in the crime of maltreatment are limited to the persons with kinship, marriage or adoptive relationship. Moreover, the concept of living in a family is too narrow, which is not conducive to the regulation of maltreatment, so the subject of the crime of abuse should be expanded to deal with the new situation in the society.
【學位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張明楷;論刑法的謙抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法學院學報);1995年04期

2 胡巧絨;;美國兒童虐待法律保護體系介紹及對我國的啟示[J];青少年犯罪問題;2011年05期

3 高仕銀;;虐待罪及其處遇——基于和諧社會語境下的思考[J];西部法學評論;2008年06期

4 劉憲權(quán);吳舟;;刑事法治視域下處理虐童行為的應(yīng)然路徑[J];青少年犯罪問題;2013年01期

5 徐文文;趙秉志;;關(guān)于虐待罪立法完善問題的研討——兼論虐童行為的犯罪化[J];法治研究;2013年03期

6 彭夫;;兒童保護的刑法難題及解決路徑——以溫嶺虐童事件為例[J];法制與社會;2013年06期

7 任海濤;張思遠;;虐童行為的刑法理論分析——兼論“虐童罪”不宜成為獨立罪名[J];青少年犯罪問題;2013年02期

8 張明楷;新刑法與法益侵害說[J];法學研究;2000年01期

9 段麗;;對教師虐童行為刑法規(guī)制的思考[J];寧夏社會科學;2013年02期

10 陳晶琦;;我國兒童虐待及受害兒童心理健康的研究進展[J];中華兒科雜志;2006年08期

本文編號：1801595