本文選題：法益 + 破壞��； 參考：《南京師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營罪的法益既不是財產(chǎn)所有權,也不是生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營秩序,而是生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營的經(jīng)濟利益。本罪行為對象是生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營,生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營不要求以營利為目的,非法的生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營也需要給予法律保護,否則秩序就無法得到保護,并且該罪中的生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營不要求以營利為目的。破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營罪的“破壞”沒有固定的意思,因為在我國刑法中“破壞”既可以指物理毀壞,也可以指狀態(tài)改變,甚至受到不良影響等。對于本罪的其他方法,應當認定為與殘害耕畜、破壞機器設備相當?shù)钠茐男袨?應當包含威力和詭計。破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營罪不是目的犯,“報復泄憤或者其他個人目的”并不是本罪犯罪目的,也不是本罪與破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營罪界限要素,而僅僅是本罪的動機。故意毀壞財物罪與破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營罪并不是一般法條與特殊法條的關系,二者可以構成想象競合。解釋破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營罪的構成要件就能為該罪賦予新的生命力,規(guī)制惡意注冊、惡意好評等新型的破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營的行為。
[Abstract]:The legal interests of the crime of destroying production and operation are neither property ownership nor order of production and operation, but economic interests of production and operation. The object of this crime is production and operation. Production and operation do not require the purpose of profit, illegal production and operation also need to give legal protection, otherwise order can not be protected, and the production and operation of this crime does not require profit as the purpose. The "destruction" of the crime of destroying production and operation has no fixed meaning, because in the criminal law of our country, "destruction" can not only refer to physical destruction, but also to the change of state, and even be adversely affected, etc. The other methods of this crime shall be regarded as acts of destruction which are equivalent to the killing of farm animals and the destruction of machinery and equipment, and shall contain power and cunning. The crime of destroying production and operation is not a crime of purpose, "revenge or other personal purpose" is not the purpose of this crime, nor is it the element of the boundary between this crime and the crime of destroying production and operation, but is only the motive of this crime. The crime of intentionally destroying property and the crime of destroying production and operation are not the relationship between general law and special law. Explaining the constitutive elements of the crime of destroying production and operation can give new vitality to the crime, regulate malicious registration, malicious praise and other new acts of destroying production and operation.
【學位授予單位】：南京師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 黃曉亮;;惡意給好評致使網(wǎng)店被降權處理的刑法評價[J];中國檢察官;2015年06期

2 李懷勝;;“惡意好評”引發(fā)的刑法問題及其思索[J];中國檢察官;2015年06期

3 張明楷;;妨害業(yè)務行為的刑法規(guī)制[J];法學雜志;2014年07期

4 黎宏;;論盜竊財產(chǎn)性利益[J];清華法學;2013年06期

5 陳燁;李森;;論刑法中的財產(chǎn)性利益[J];中國刑事法雜志;2012年11期

6 柏浪濤;;破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營罪問題辨析[J];中國刑事法雜志;2010年03期

7 張明楷;;犯罪之間的界限與競合[J];中國法學;2008年04期

8 王鈞;;刑法解釋的常識化[J];法學研究;2006年06期

9 王z，

本文編號：1779062