天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁 > 法律論文 > 刑法論文 >

論實質(zhì)解釋視域下扒竊犯罪構(gòu)成要件

發(fā)布時間:2018-04-18 21:45

  本文選題:實質(zhì)解釋 + 扒竊; 參考:《海南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文


【摘要】:《刑法修正案(八)》與“兩高”《關(guān)于辦理盜竊刑事案件適用法律若干問題的解釋》(2013年)對“扒竊”的規(guī)定簡單,解釋不明,需要進(jìn)一步解釋。在我國刑法語境下,對“扒竊”規(guī)定的解釋存在實質(zhì)解釋與形式解釋兩種路徑。 實質(zhì)解釋與形式解釋相比較,根本的不同在于理念與“詮釋學(xué)”視角。在我國立法“定性+定量”模式下,形式解釋“扒竊”存在嚴(yán)重弊端,而實質(zhì)解釋“扒竊”更具合理性。實質(zhì)解釋“扒竊”應(yīng)在刑法謙抑、“善”等理念引導(dǎo)下,在文理解釋的限度內(nèi),采取體系解釋、歷史解釋、目的解釋等方法進(jìn)行;同時,受刑法第13條“但書”規(guī)制,任何犯罪成立都需要在“量”上達(dá)到一定危害程度,而傳統(tǒng)的四要件、德日三階層均不能契合這一規(guī)范要求,所以借鑒陳興良教授“罪體+罪責(zé)+罪量”三要件思路,實質(zhì)解釋扒竊可以在“定性+定量”犯罪論體系內(nèi)進(jìn)行。其中“定性”解決的是行為該當(dāng)性、違法性(有無)、有責(zé)性(有無)問題,“定量”回答的是危害程度是否“應(yīng)受刑罰懲罰”。實質(zhì)解釋“扒竊”,可以得出“扒竊”入刑是為了保護(hù)人民財產(chǎn)、規(guī)避潛在的人身危害、增強(qiáng)人民出行安全感的結(jié)論,即立法目的;同時,也能找到“扒竊”與“搶奪”的界線。根據(jù)立法目的與體系協(xié)調(diào)要求,“扒竊”以“非法占有目的”必要,其中,“公共場所”應(yīng)以“傳播說”為界定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),“隨身攜帶物”以“隨時可能支配說”為確定準(zhǔn)則,“手段”則以“平和說”認(rèn)定為宜。對“定量”要件的判斷是法定范圍的,建立在社會主流倫理價值與普遍經(jīng)驗基礎(chǔ)上的、概括的、個體的判斷,主要從違法程度與有責(zé)程度兩方面進(jìn)行。
[Abstract]:"Criminal Law Amendment (8) > and" two High level "< explanation on some problems of applicable Law in handling Criminal case of Theft" (2013) the stipulation of "pickpocketing" is simple, the interpretation is unclear, and needs further explanation.In the context of criminal law of our country, there are two ways to interpret the "pickpocket" regulation: substantive interpretation and formal interpretation.The fundamental difference between substantive interpretation and formal interpretation lies in the perspective of concept and hermeneutics.In the mode of "qualitative and quantitative" legislation in our country, there are serious disadvantages in the formal interpretation of "pickpocketing", but it is more reasonable to explain "pickpocketing" in essence.Under the guidance of criminal law, "goodness" and so on, the substantive interpretation of "pickpocketing" should be carried out by means of systematic interpretation, historical interpretation and objective interpretation, etc. At the same time, it is regulated by the proviso of Article 13 of the Criminal Law.The establishment of any crime needs to reach a certain degree of harm in terms of "quantity", and the traditional four elements, Germany and Japan, can not meet the requirements of this norm.The essence explanation of pickpocketing can be carried out in the system of qualitative and quantitative crime theory.Among them, "qualitative" solves the problem of "behavior should be appropriate", illegality (have or not, have or not), "quantitative" answer is whether the degree of harm "should be punished".To explain "pickpocketing" in essence, we can draw the conclusion that the purpose of "pickpocketing" is to protect people's property, to avoid potential personal harm and to enhance the people's sense of safety in travel, that is, legislative purpose, and at the same time,The line between pickpocketing and snatching can also be found.According to the legislative purpose and system coordination requirement, pickpocketing is necessary to "illegal possession purpose", in which "public place" should be defined by "communication theory", "carry-on" should be determined by "disposable theory"."means" should be determined by "peace theory".The judgment of "quantitative" elements is legal, which is based on the social mainstream ethical value and universal experience. The judgment of individual is mainly from two aspects: the degree of violation of law and the degree of responsibility.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梅錦;;論我國犯罪構(gòu)成理論的完善——以不同犯罪論體系的比較為視角[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2011年01期

2 陳家林;;論刑法中的扒竊——對《刑法修正案(八)》的分析與解讀[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2011年04期

3 張明楷;論財產(chǎn)罪的非法占有目的[J];法商研究;2005年05期

4 張明楷;論刑法的謙抑性[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);1995年04期

5 張明楷;刑法理念與刑法解釋[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年04期

6 張明楷;;盜竊與搶奪的界限[J];法學(xué)家;2006年02期

7 張飛飛;;我國犯罪構(gòu)成理論的合理性探討[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2011年01期

8 胡鵬;;論犯罪動機(jī)在當(dāng)代刑法中的地位[J];法制與社會;2010年21期

9 范忠信;;“期待之可能性”與我國刑事法的“法治圣賢定位”——從“親親相隱”的角度觀察[J];廣東社會科學(xué);2010年02期

10 劉艷紅;;目的二階層體系與“但書”出罪功能的自洽性[J];法學(xué)評論;2012年06期



本文編號:1770218

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/1770218.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶d526a***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要刪除請E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com